Cuddlebeam has nothing to do with these proposals?  Please reconsider CFJ
3520 and fix the obvious error.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:24 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I find CFJ 3520 TRUE as the proposal was submitted by G., while he was
> acting as Cuddlebeam. I find that for instances such as this acting as a
> person is equivalent to being that person. Given that no persons other than
> Cuddlebeam were included, I find that no coauthors exist for this proposal.
>
> I find CFJ 3521 FALSE because Quazie did not grant G. authority to specify
> a proposal competition through his agency.
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 2017, at 3:07 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 00:04 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 23:24 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 15:13 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Note to Arbitor:  this message contains 2 CFJs, below.
> >>>
> >>> (Note to judges: there are two CFJs assigned to judges in this
> >>> message.)
> >
> > (Note to judges: there are two CFJs reassigned to judges in this
> > message.)
> >
> >>>
> >>>> I use the BÖÖ Agency to submit the following proposal, "Throw off Your
> >>>> Chains", AI-3, specifying that it is a Competition Proposal for the
> >>>> current proposal competition:
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -----
> >>>> WHEREAS:
> >>>>    The perpetuation of dictatorship is not treating Agora Right Good
> >>>>    Forever;
> >>>>
> >>>> and WHEREAS:
> >>>>    The existence of dictatorship is an anathema, and the presence of
> >>>>    a current dictatorship in the Rules is a Mess of our own making;
> >>>>
> >>>> and WHEREAS:
> >>>>    The persons in power have not made a visible effort to clean up
> >>>>    said mess, in perhaps hoping that the hoi agorai will remain
> >>>>    docile, or apathetic;
> >>>>
> >>>> and WHEREAS:
> >>>>    such docility, in the long-term, is fully AGAINST OUR NATURE;
> >>>>
> >>>> BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED:
> >>>>    That Rule 2942 (Reward and Delay) is hereby REPEALED.
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I CFJ on the following:
> >>>>    Quazie is the author of the proposal "Throw off Your Chains".
> >>>
> >>> This is CFJ 3520. I assign it to Gaelan.
> >
> > I remove Gaelan as judge of this CFJ, and assign it to Publius
> > Scribonius Scholasticus.
> >
> >>>> Evidence: (above proposal & submission statement).
> >>>>
> >>>> Arguments:
> >>>>
> >>>> I state for the record that Quazie had no knowledge of this proposal
> >>>> before it was sent to the public forum.  The proposal was written by
> >>>> G., and submitted on behalf of Quazie via the BÖÖ Agency.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rule 2350 reads in part:
> >>>>       A player CAN create a proposal by announcement...
> >>>> this is clearly Quazie.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it also reads:
> >>>>       The author (syn. proposer) of a proposal is the person who
> >>>>       submitted it.
> >>>> "Submit" is not directly defined, and could be the publisher of the
> >>>> message.  In this case, the sender and writer of the proposal is G.
> >>>> Which one is the "person who submitted it"?
> >>>>
> >>>> ==========================
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I CFJ on the following (linked to the above, please):
> >>>>    The proposal "Throw off Your Chains" is a competition proposal
> >>>>    for the current proposal competition.
> >>>
> >>> This is CFJ 3521. I assign it to Gaelan.
> >
> > I remove Gaelan as judge of this CFJ, and assign it to Publius
> > Scribonius Scholasticus.
> >
> >>>> Evidence:  (above proposal & submission statement).
> >>>>
> >>>> Arguments:
> >>>> Rule 2431 reads in part:
> >>>>              any player CAN specify that a Proposal e submits is
> >>>>       a Competition Proposal for that Competition.
> >>>>
> >>>> Whether this is in the proposal competition depends on whether
> >>>> Quazie "submitted" the proposal, and whether G. had the ability
> >>>> through the BÖÖ Agency to specify the competition.
> >
> > --
> > ais523
> > Arbitor
>
>

Reply via email to