Noted, and I’m not planning to let it drop. I’m just trying to finish up my
other Agoran work first, since once I start this it’ll take up most of my
Agoran time. I’m also having a personal crisis (romantic trouble, it’s not
like anyone died, but it still feels pretty all consuming) which is slowin
I note that 4 days have elapsed since this intent and that 3 objections
have not been given.
[Sorry if there's a reason for this to have not happened yet, I just
don't want this to end up forgotten and another waiting period to be
required.]
Jason Cobb
On 7/24/19 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant wrot
On 7/30/19 10:59 PM, James Cook wrote:
Incidentally, I think the inextricable thing was recently repealed in
Proposal 8212.
You're right, I guess https://agoranomic.org/ruleset/slr.txt isn't fresh
right now. What's worse is that I wrote the proposal that repealed that
rule :P.
Jason Cobb
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 02:45, Jason Cobb wrote:
> How does this work with conditionals? A conditional on the state of the
> wheel would probably be inextricable, but I don't see any text that
> actually stops inextricable conditionals (except for a SHOULD) besides
> voting.
>
> Jason Cobb
That's
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 16:06, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Proto for time protection (a homage to B Nomic):
>
> Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by replacing its first paragraph
> with:
>
>Agora is ossified if it is IMPOSSIBLE for any reasonable
>combination of actions by players to caus
How does this work with conditionals? A conditional on the state of the
wheel would probably be inextricable, but I don't see any text that
actually stops inextricable conditionals (except for a SHOULD) besides
voting.
Jason Cobb
On 7/30/19 10:42 PM, James Cook wrote:
New subject line as I'm
New subject line as I'm hoping to focus a new thread just on this
proto-proposal.
The below power-0.5 game is intended as a test of the idea of actions
depending on the future. I'm happy to reduce the winning condition to
just getting some Coins or a congratulations or something, if people
prefer.
Okay, first, practical matters:
* Given your position on the matter, Aris, I don't plan to push for
this change any time soon.
* I'm still keen to try out the power-0.5 mini game. I have at least
one correction which I'll post separately. I'm curious to hear your
thoughts.
Now, less-practi
> - Enforce this norm by lowering people's honor for not following it (I
> just generally like the idea of using honor to reinforce norms since it
> doesn't do much else)
I like this idea.
--
- Falsifian
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 02:31, Edward Murphy wrote:
> I vote as follows. Also, not sure what the difficulties were here, but
> in any case, how would people feel about multiple distributions per week
> (5 to 10 per day, say)? (No, I'm not bidding for the office myself.)
As a voter, I would be just
On 7/28/19 4:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Incidentally, it’s pretty unlikely that I could persuade y’all to approve
this, but my life would be way simpler if proposals could only be submitted
in messages that had “proposal” in the subject line. Currently, I have to
read through every public messag
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:40 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
> be no posts at all (maybe for months at a time), so anyone inquiring
> about what was happening (or even paying attention to the mailing list,
> typically prompted by a message) would imply an end to the slump.
lol Wooble literally
On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 15:08 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:32 AM Jason Cobb
> wrote:
> > Oddly enough, while I was looking for nomics, I found B Nomic and
> > saw that there was no activity for a while. I guess that explains
> > that.
> >
> > Out of curiosity, is there any
ais523 is our resident expert I think (sorry if I'm forgetting anyone
else who was there!) Some others of us from Agora dropped in to
observe when it was all going on but didn't really get involved.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:32 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> Oddly enough, while I was looking for nomic
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:24 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:06 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Proto for time protection (a homage to B Nomic):
> >
> > Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by replacing its first paragraph
> > with:
> >
> >Agora is ossified if it is IMPOS
On 7/30/19 3:00 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I claim a
reward of 5 cops for judging CFJ 3759.
I'm not sure how those policemen will feel about you claiming them :).
Jason Cobb
On 7/30/19 2:59 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Jason Cobb did not publish any message stating eir intent to declare victory
by apathy. Accordingly, e could not declare apathy. FALSE.
Well, I tried :P. Although I guess I'm glad that I didn't manage to
ossify the game.
Jason Cobb
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:19 AM James Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 06:57, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > First off, I’m very happy you published this. It’s very interesting and it
> > adds a lot to the discourse. I will now proceed to state why I think it’s a
> > bad idea. (Upon retreading
Oddly enough, while I was looking for nomics, I found B Nomic and saw that
there was no activity for a while. I guess that explains that.
Out of curiosity, is there anywhere with more information about the bug and
what happened?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 12:05 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Proto for ti
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:06 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Proto for time protection (a homage to B Nomic):
>
> Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by replacing its first paragraph
> with:
>
>Agora is ossified if it is IMPOSSIBLE for any reasonable
>combination of actions by players t
Proto for time protection (a homage to B Nomic):
Amend Rule 1698 (Agora Is A Nomic) by replacing its first paragraph
with:
Agora is ossified if it is IMPOSSIBLE for any reasonable
combination of actions by players to cause arbitrary rule changes
to be made and/or arbitrary pr
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 06:57, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> First off, I’m very happy you published this. It’s very interesting and it
> adds a lot to the discourse. I will now proceed to state why I think it’s a
> bad idea. (Upon retreading your post, these amount to explanations of why
> concerns c and
On 7/28/19 4:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 7/28/2019 2:49 PM, Aris
Merchant wrote:
> Incidentally, it’s pretty unlikely that I could persuade y’all to approve
> this, but my life would be way simpler if proposals could only be submitted
> in messages that had “proposal” in the subject line. Cu
23 matches
Mail list logo
