On 7/28/19 4:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:> On 7/28/2019 2:49 PM, Aris
Merchant wrote:
> Incidentally, it’s pretty unlikely that I could persuade y’all to approve
> this, but my life would be way simpler if proposals could only be submitted
> in messages that had “proposal” in the subject line. Currently, I have to
> read through every public message to even formulate a list of proposals. If
> we went that direction, it would probably make sense to do it for CFJs and
> votes as well.
For what it's worth, I do try to remember to tag all my emails in which
I submit a proposal.
CFJs maybe - I don't mind the idea but searching Business for "cfj" or
"call" has worked so far without many misses. And since they're not
released as a batch, and since CFJs don't require "everyone" to respond the
way voting does, it's pretty easy to say "that wasn't really a CFJ" or
"oops forgot one" with very limited consequences.
I agree here, for the most part. This is not necessary from a
recordkeeping point of view, and it might not even increase the
Assessor's quality of life. There is one place where I see this being
useful, however, and that is for historians. It's fairly simple to run a
scan in an email client, but for someone looking for a judgement using
the mailman interface, it might be more convenient to be able to search
for a "[CFJ]" tag in a-b. Especially if there is a lot of discourse
about the case in question.
--
Trigon
