On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 21:35 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> It never has and it never will. Ruleset ratification causes nasty
> formatting problems, and leaves the door open for some extremely
> dangerous scams. Anyhow, unless someone has gone and ratified it by
> proposal without me noticing (hard,
It never has and it never will. Ruleset ratification causes nasty
formatting problems, and leaves the door open for some extremely dangerous
scams. Anyhow, unless someone has gone and ratified it by proposal without
me noticing (hard, given that I’m Promotor, although I’ve managed to forget
things
It doesn't? Well clearly I am not a reliable source for information
about ratification.
On 10/18/2018 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the
ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying.
-Aris
On
Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the
ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying.
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:14 PM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> This rule was changed to a strange list formatting method by ruleset
> ratificatio
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> 2. Enact a new Rule entitled “FBOA Patent Title” (Power=1) that reads:
>
> “The Herald CAN, and SHALL in a timely manner after this Rule is enacted,
> by announcement award to each of D. Margaux and G. the Patent Title of
> ‘Bank Robber.’ This Rule will
Setting up a new bank sounds like a fun idea!
I just wouldn’t want to have the coin imbalance to prevent us from actually
turning coins/points/whatever into something useful going forward.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:18 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> > Now that
I mean, all someone has to do to run an unofficial auction is say that
they'll give a number of assets to someone who gives them the most of some
currency and then maybe back it by a pledge.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 16:28 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> > Create
oh, I guess I never read that through. Cool.
On 10/18/2018 6:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
That same proposal that removes Land keeps Coins as a currency, putting in
proposal-based methods for earning coins.
That's not to say it can't be replaced or reskinned again with something
in-theme for eit
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
> Create a new power-1 rule entitled 'Free Auctions' with the text:
>
> A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> specified by this rule CAN, by announcement, initiate an auction
> with emself as the auctioneer The lo
That same proposal that removes Land keeps Coins as a currency, putting in
proposal-based methods for earning coins.
That's not to say it can't be replaced or reskinned again with something
in-theme for either space or politics, but it's not "urgent" in the sense
of it being missing.
On Thu, 1
Right now, we're using coins until we come up with something else. And the
Point Installation Act did not pass.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 16:17 ATMunn wrote:
> I realized something during the recent discussion regarding my space
> proposal - since PAoaM is likely going to be repealed soon, Agora wil
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> Now that the bank heist scam has run its course, what would people think of a
> proposal along the following lines? It would reduce my and G’s coins to what
> they would be if we hadn’t run the scam, and in return awards a patent title
> that is perhaps
I realized something during the recent discussion regarding my space
proposal - since PAoaM is likely going to be repealed soon, Agora will
be left without a currency.
This isn't the worst thing, but I feel like in order to really make
space interesting, there needs to be a currency here. I see t
On 10/17/2018 6:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
[snip]
No, you’re really on the right track. You’ve brainstormed correctly.
Remember how I said “start with a very simple idea and then add just enough
so it's not actively boring”? You’ve done the very simple idea, which is
great. Now you need to do
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> As fun as it would be to keep stringing you all along, I feel I should come
> clean:
> I am not trying to hide any specific announcement of intent to perform a
> dependent
> action. What really happened is that I mixed up the proposal ID numbers
Any rule messiness regarding auctions is to be blamed on me. :)
On 10/18/2018 5:06 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
I submit the following two proposals:
-
title: Auction cleanup
ai: 1
author: Trigon
coauthors:
[ Comment: I noticed that there are an entire eight rules defining
auctions and I th
Now that the bank heist scam has run its course, what would people think of a
proposal along the following lines? It would reduce my and G’s coins to what
they would be if we hadn’t run the scam, and in return awards a patent title
that is perhaps appropriate for the occasion.
1. The
All of these are valid except the last. If a player is the auctioneer, e
becomes the announcer as well.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 16:00 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Good idea! Minor comments on the second one:
>
> > A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> > specified by this rule C
Welcome, Hālian! As G. already pointed out, you need to send this to the
agora-business mailing list in order for it to take effect. Either way,
welcome to Agora Nomic.
On 10/18/2018 7:15 AM, hal...@safiria.net wrote:
In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
inten
Good idea! Minor comments on the second one:
> A player who is not the auctioneer of an existing Auction
> specified by this rule CAN, by announcement, initiate an auction
> with emself as the auctioneer The lots, minimum bid, and currency
> of the Auction shall be set by said player.
- This says
This format of report used to be used officially by the Arbitor,
when that was going on, it was typically done with a comment field
something like this:
> Judged TRUE by twg: [as of this message]
(on a side note, should I start publishing these again after cases
are complet
Hi Hālian, you need to send this message to the business email
list , which is defined as a "public"
forum. agora-discussion is defined as a "discussion" forum where
messages have no effect.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, hal...@safiria.net wrote:
> In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby
Hello and Welcome to Agora!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 05:15 wrote:
> In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
> intent to become a player of Agora Nomic.
>
> (Also, where relevant, I am a he.)
>
In accordance with Rule 869/33, I, Hālian, hereby publish a message of
intent to become a player of Agora Nomic.
(Also, where relevant, I am a he.)
Bugger, got my time zones mixed up. This was, of course, judged at 10:24, not
11:24.
This is my first ever CFJ judgement - please do not hesitate to say if I got
something wrong.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 18, 2018 10:24 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey
wrote:
> ==
I'm sorry, I hadn't realised CFJ 3664 had already been assigned (I remembered
favouring it but thought the assignment was one of the things we were waiting
on Murphy for). I'll aim to publish the judgement later today.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 18, 2018 1:22 AM
26 matches
Mail list logo
