It doesn't? Well clearly I am not a reliable source for information
about ratification.
On 10/18/2018 10:28 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the
ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying.
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:14 PM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
wrote:
This rule was changed to a strange list formatting method by ruleset
ratification thanks to Kenyon. The second lines of the last two items of
the list were starred as well as the first. An inconsequential change,
but it annoyed me so here we are.
I submit and pend the following proposal:
-----
title: This isn't list formatting!
ai: 1
author: Trigon
coauthors:
Amend rule 2492 'Recusal' by replacing the list with:
* the CFJ becomes unassigned;
* the recused judge becomes ineligible to be assigned as a judge
for a week; and
* the recused judge SHOULD suggest another judge for the CFJ to
make the Arbitor's job easier.
--
Trigon
--
Trigon
