Wait, sorry. What do you mean ruleset ratification? We haven’t ratified the ruleset in almost a year, if my memory is correct. It isn’t self-ratifying.
-Aris On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:14 PM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > This rule was changed to a strange list formatting method by ruleset > ratification thanks to Kenyon. The second lines of the last two items of > the list were starred as well as the first. An inconsequential change, > but it annoyed me so here we are. > > I submit and pend the following proposal: > > ----- > title: This isn't list formatting! > ai: 1 > author: Trigon > coauthors: > > Amend rule 2492 'Recusal' by replacing the list with: > > * the CFJ becomes unassigned; > > * the recused judge becomes ineligible to be assigned as a judge > for a week; and > > * the recused judge SHOULD suggest another judge for the CFJ to > make the Arbitor's job easier. > > -- > Trigon >
