On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> As fun as it would be to keep stringing you all along, I feel I should come
> clean:
> I am not trying to hide any specific announcement of intent to perform a
> dependent
> action. What really happened is that I mixed up the proposal ID numbers, G.
> assumed
> something suspicious was going on, and it seemed funnier to play along than
> to
> clarify what had happened. :P
Oooh, the triple-bluff. Not falling for it.
(Seriously, I mostly assumed you'd respond to my objection with "oops, voted on
wrong
proposal", it was only when you trolled with the CFJ that I got truly paranoid
- so
well done there...).
