I'm happy to admit that I may have been wrong on this one. However,
extensibility is important. I was hoping we could do it in a short
paragraph, not a whole rule. What do you guys think?
-Aris
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:05 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Sorry I forgot to bring this up earlier, but I
Sorry I forgot to bring this up earlier, but I think unless we have a use case
for facilities with multiple types, we should just have a simple
production/processing/{monument,other} option. This is well-written, but until
we need it I think it would be better to avoid the complexity.
Gaelan
On the use of switches: Is it appropriate to have something be a switch if
there isn't really any case in which its value would change other than a
rule change? I originally had a facility's Categories and Allowed Land
Types as Switches but I couldn't find any examples of them being used like
that.
Comments inline.
On 3/2/2018 2:37 PM, Kenyon Prater wrote:
Gray Land and Fountain Draft 1 {
Amend rule 1995/0 "Land Types" (Power=2.0):
Replace "whose values are "Black", "White", and "Aether"", with the
text "whose values are "Black", "White", "Gray", and "Aether""
Create a new rule
Gray Land and Fountain Draft 1 {
Amend rule 1995/0 "Land Types" (Power=2.0):
Replace "whose values are "Black", "White", and "Aether"", with the
text "whose values are "Black", "White", "Gray", and "Aether""
Create a new rule "Facility Categories", (Power=2.0):
A Category is an entity
I want to say there's an old CFJ that says something like: if it leads
to a link that's pretty clear, and we can be reasonably certain that the
message-sender can't change or control what appears at the end of the
link, it's fine (I think someone once did a link to something on their
website tha
Me too, but just Weekend please.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> As am I.
>
> > On Mar 2, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm interested in judging again.
> >
> >
> >
>
I support both.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:18 AM, Corona wrote:
> Oh well.
>
> I intend to award the title of Champion by Politics to Aris with 2 Agoran
> Consent.
>
> I intend to award the (new) title of Reformist Bug to Trigon with 2 Agoran
> Consent.
>
> On 23:20, Mar 1, 2018, at 23:20, Kerim
I think non-Proc/Prod facilities would be great. Walls or streets for
example would be cool.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd go with solution 2, but modified. What if we made it so that each
> facility could fit into (0 or more) "ca
Suggestion:
The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to someone who publishes
certain quantities of poems.
to
The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to any Player who has
performed a great feat of literature.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Y
Hrm, Miasma could work as a more granular kind of system than cards. Maybe
have Miasma go from 0 to 100, and minor punishments grant 0-25 Miasma,
while more severe ones grant 25-50. You'd lose 10 Miasma each month, and
depending on how much Miasma you've got, you'd be more or less "sick" with
diffe
11 matches
Mail list logo
