Suggestion: The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to someone who publishes certain quantities of poems.
to The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to any Player who has performed a great feat of literature. On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > Your phrasing sounds like an obligation to give the title to all deserving > players. Maybe something like this? > > The following titles CAN be awarded to any player by the holders of the > listed offices with 2 Support. They SHOULD only be given to players that > meet the qualifications listed. > > - Scamster (Referee): any Player who has shown great enthusiasm, > persistence, or skill in the perpetrating of scams. > > > On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:39 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > Good thinking. Definitely will add SHOULDS to the standards for each, > > but probably good to say additionally in the rule that whether a player > > meets those standards is a political question not a judicial one (i.e. > > if it gets the right support/consent, it qualifies). > > > > Here's the old standard for scamster as an example: > > (a) Scamster, which may be awarded to any Player who has shown > > great enthusiasm, persistence, or skill in the perpetrating > > of scams. > > I'd change "may be" to SHOULD here and add the "CAN with support level." > > > >> On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: > >> Probably want the criteria for each to be SHOULDs so that we don't have > CFJs > >> about just how brilliant a judgement was. I like the idea. > >> > >> Gaelan > >> > >>> On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:01 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> We used to have more Patent Titles named in the rules, and different > >>> officers were allowed to award them under certain conditions. We > >>> dropped that on the grounds that the Herald could generically award > >>> any of them when it seemed appropriate, but it meant the reasons for > >>> some of the awards (e.g. Long Service) got lost from memory. > >>> > >>> Should we re-implement? E.g. > >>> > >>> The ADoP CAN award X months long service for X=3,6,9,12 when a > >>> person without that title has served in a single office continuously > >>> for that length of time. > >>> > >>> The Reportor (alt: Herald) CAN award Bard w/2 support to someone who > >>> publishes certain quantities of poems. > >>> > >>> The Referee CAN award Scamster w/2 support to someone who performs > >>> a major scam. > >>> > >>> The Arbitor CAN award the title Sage w/2 support to someone who > >>> delivers a particularly brilliant judgement. > >>> > >>> Etc. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
