The Treasuror’s report is now online at https://agoranomic.org/Treasuror. In
addition, if anyone wants it for automation, there is both a log.yaml (event
log) and current.yaml (current state, generated from log) file in the GitHub
repository.
Gaelan
Can I just say that I still really like the idea of this proposal? I don't
really want to attempt judicial reform, however, since I just got done with
a different game(chang|break)ing proposal.
El 27 feb. 2018 17:10, "Aris Merchant"
escribió:
> Forwarding a message from back when I was working o
New Processing Facility: Temple? Turns tithe into forgiveness, lol.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Weevils were just my 5-minute thinking for "we're doing something that's
> based on farming, what's a good word to re-skin Blots to something bad
> for a farmer?" I'd p
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Comments inline
Comments on comments inline...
> > The voting strength of a player on an Agoran Decision is reduced
> > by 1 for every 3 weevils in eir possession.
>
> Voting strength is an integer, right? I kind of like the idea of this
Thanks for this, it's been a while since I read the PAoaM proposal and I
forgot a lot of stuff.
On 2/27/2018 12:26 AM, Edward Murphy wrote:
Agora economic FAQ (updated 2018-02-26)
This is an informal summary of the board-game-esque areas of
gameplay (as opposed to proposals/offices/CFJs), and
Comments inline
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>
> proto-proposal, the Lesson of the Weevils
>
>
>
> Create the following Rule, Weevils, power-2:
>
> Weevils are an indestructible fixed c
Weevils were just my 5-minute thinking for "we're doing something that's
based on farming, what's a good word to re-skin Blots to something bad
for a farmer?" I'd prefer not to re-use the term Blots, just because
names identify different past eras, but happy to find a term fitting
the "incen
Forwarding a message from back when I was working on a judicial system
proposal. I dropped it, after realizing that that 1) this kind of system
needs to be written modularly, or it turns into a tightly bound mess and 2)
I can't write modularly. However, this could perhaps be used as theme for
G.'s
Well clearly, yeah.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE
>> because no ratification or anything.
>
> Got it. Assuming you're using edwardostrange at gmail.com, le
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
> That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE
> because no ratification or anything.
Got it. Assuming you're using edwardostrange at gmail.com, let me know if
different.
That's no longer the email I use for this game. Obviously not a COE
because no ratification or anything.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Registrar's Weekly Report
> --
Actually, nobody has any corn yet, so this was ineffective anyway. Would still
like feedback on the proto.
Gaelan
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Did we ever decide what happens with payments for failed actions? My vague
> recollection was that “I spend one coin TO d
I think the simplest solution here is to pass a patch proposal, then RWO our
reports from this week. Cleans things up without any crazy retroactivity.
Gaelan
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how much retroactive magic is going to help. I think we
> nee
I'm not sure how much retroactive magic is going to help. I think we
need to go carefully over it, and then decide whether we need to start
over from scratch. It's looking like we may want to, what with land
auctions being broken and everything. Suggestions?
-Aris
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:35 AM
That explains it. I think Gmail corrected to agora-business-request on both
(since I had sent the confirmation email it thought that was what I wanted,
I guess) and I didn't catch it. Joining soon. Since I am not a player, I
do not free-CFJ.
Kenyon
On Feb 27, 2018 10:16 AM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
Hi Kenyon,
Question from Registrar: Did you attempt to register/become a player at any
point?
(Just looking at your "if I am a player..." below). Can't find an attempted
registration. Also noting you sent the below CFJ attempt to
agora-business-request,
not agora-business.
Also, you don'
Ah, well. OK.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> that was before we put in the requirement for the explicit CAN in R2125
> this past October, specifically to plug that hole.
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > I think this applies
> >
> > CFJ 2120-2121 (called
that was before we put in the requirement for the explicit CAN in R2125
this past October, specifically to plug that hole.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I think this applies
>
> CFJ 2120-2121 (called Aug 04, 2008):
>
> A requirement of the form 'within , a player SHALL
>by an
I think this applies
CFJ 2120-2121 (called Aug 04, 2008):
A requirement of the form 'within , a player SHALL
by announcement' means that the player CAN perform the
action, and SHALL do so within the time limit.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I don't see a CA
G. wrote:
I withdraw my nomination for Reportor (if I nominated myself - can't remember).
You didn't, but I think I'll need to update the ADoP UI to support
that event (at least when someone actually does). That reminds me,
I'll also remove Complexity from the report since that's no longer
def
I don't see a CAN in that sentence?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> "If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer it to
> Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit,
> and set *all
> other switches* to their default values."
>
> >all othe
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 11:15 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I don't think it can happen. It's like if you use a single broomstick
> to
> flip all of the breakers off, but a few of the breakers can't move.
> You
> can't do it. It's "ALL" of the switches as a single process, not each
> individually.
On
I don't think it can happen. It's like if you use a single broomstick to
flip all of the breakers off, but a few of the breakers can't move. You
can't do it. It's "ALL" of the switches as a single process, not each
individually.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 10:51 +0100, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> "If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer
> it to
> Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit,
> and set *all
> other switches* to their default values."
>
> > all other switches
>
> Which
"If Proprietary Land becomes Aether, the Cartographor SHALL transfer it to
Agora in a timely fashion, destroy any facilities on the Land Unit,
and set *all
other switches* to their default values."
>all other switches
Which means citizenship, ribbons, etc. Fortunately that rule is Power 2 and
Cit
25 matches
Mail list logo
