This is a revised version of my previous report, and as such is only accurate
to the time of that report.
The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
IDAuthor(s) AI Title
---
pp1 Ienpw III 1.
Oops, I was under the impression creating a proposal was an automatic FOR.
Guess not.
Gaelan
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> You didn't vote, so yes?
>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judici
NttPF
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 8:57 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I vote PRESENT.
>
> -Aris
>
> > On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant
> > wrote:
> > I hereby
I vote PRESENT.
-Aris
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:57 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I vote PRESENT.
>
> -Aris
>
> > On Jun 6, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I hereby distribute ea
You didn't vote, so yes?
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial
> proceedings or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is
> the case
>
> Gaelan
>
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
> On
Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial proceedings
or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is the case
Gaelan
> On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant
>> wrote:
>> I hereby distribute each lis
Even though it wasn't set then, it would've been set to that [Along with
the Elections started by nichdel that I still need to resolve]
I'm going to just assume Quorum is 4 for these decisions as there's no
reason to act otherwise.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:07 PM Quazie wrote:
> nttpf.
>
> And Q
Note: In the recent ais523 scam where e was assisted by nichdel's Assessor
position, someone should've Pointed a Finger at nichdel as e violated a
SHALL in rule 2168 by not shaming us all for not voting.
nttpf.
And Quorum, by the rules right now, for this proposal, would be 4 as that's
the reflection of the Assessor's resolution of proposals on the 24th of May
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:05 PM Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 23:55 +, Quazie wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 23:55 +, Quazie wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For
Note: Quorum for all Agoran Decisions that are currently open is 4.
Quorum for any Agoran Decision that begins before the next proposal
resolution will be 5
Also - Quorum doesn't have a way to handle getting too large, and it can
exceed the current number of players if too many people de-register
CuddleBeam wrote:
-"Sticky" versus "Illusion" Continuum: http://i.imgur.com/a3hRJS6.png .
This is basically the exact same issue illustrated in Vanyel's
"Pragmatism and Platonism: Two Approaches to Nomic" and especially
Steve's "Breaking the Rules", but I wasn't aware of these great
treasures at
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Is there a different proposal out there that's removing the entire
Junta thing (e.g. the Black-Ribbon granting powers, Patent Titles,
and so forth)?
I suppose we could wait for the munificence of our Dear Leader
and hope e does a self-repeal, but I prefer
The bottom part was right, I wasn't sure what was canonical - i'll complain
more in the future.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 01:23 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Quazie wrote:
> > I mean betterer pledges.
> >
>
> I have the wrong author list
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Quazie wrote:
> I mean betterer pledges.
>
I have the wrong author listed for it. Why didn't you complain? Fixes upcoming.
-Aris
Note: there is no pmp any more - is the plp accurate to recently passed
rule changes? (I am unsure)
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 01:17 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposals:
>
> IDAuthor(s) AI Title
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
