On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 23:55 +0000, Quazie wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the > > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). > > > > ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee > > (sh.) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 7858* Gaelan 3.0 Fast Resolution, now working ais523 N/A [1] > > > > > > I vote AGAINST. > > I note that only 3 votes have been placed on proposal 7858, and only 2 of > which were within the original time frame, which has been extended now to > 14 days. > > As such it would be FAILED QUORUM, but instead i SHAME EVERYONE (other than > o and Veggiekeks) including myself [Wow that's a weird shall] for not > voting during the original time frame. It's our duty, fulfil our duties! > DUTIES!
Err, what *is* the quorum on that proposal right now, anyway? The quorum rules were amended recently, so that quorum is defined at the start of the voting period rather than instantaneously; but the quorum value for the proposal never ended up getting set. In any case, just in case my vote is needed, I vote AGAINST. Although I'm curious as to the theoretical question as to what quorum is, I suggest we try to ratify a reasonable quorum value onto the Agoran Decision in question (possibly via its resolution, or possibly via RWO). -- ais523
