You didn't vote, so yes? On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote:
> Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial > proceedings or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is > the case > > Gaelan > > On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal >> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the >> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend >> fee (sh.) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 7858* Gaelan 3.0 Fast Resolution, now working ais523 N/A [1] >> >> > I vote AGAINST. > > I note that only 3 votes have been placed on proposal 7858, and only 2 of > which were within the original time frame, which has been extended now to > 14 days. > > As such it would be FAILED QUORUM, but instead i SHAME EVERYONE (other > than o and Veggiekeks) including myself [Wow that's a weird shall] for not > voting during the original time frame. It's our duty, fulfil our duties! > DUTIES! > >
