Curious: should I have been shamed? Not gonna bother with judicial proceedings or anything, but it's an amusing bug in the rules if this is the case
Gaelan > On Jun 6, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:58 PM Aris Merchant >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran >> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal >> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, and the >> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote). >> >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee >> (sh.) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 7858* Gaelan 3.0 Fast Resolution, now working ais523 N/A [1] >> > > I vote AGAINST. > > I note that only 3 votes have been placed on proposal 7858, and only 2 of > which were within the original time frame, which has been extended now to 14 > days. > > As such it would be FAILED QUORUM, but instead i SHAME EVERYONE (other than o > and Veggiekeks) including myself [Wow that's a weird shall] for not voting > during the original time frame. It's our duty, fulfil our duties! DUTIES!
