On 07/08/2011 10:18 PM, omd wrote:
> *arguably Agora would cease to be a person in the interval between the
> adoption of a proposal and the publication of an updated ruleset?
The resolution of a proposal generally includes the text of the changes;
during that interval, the entire text has not bee
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> The intent is proxied through Rule 2328, which has power 2.
>
> We've previously determined that the rules aren't an agreement. Is
> Agora as a whole? Does Agora count as having been "published"?
The requirement is that the
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Eric Stucky wrote:
>> 7086 3 G., etc. Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery
> MURPH/PRESENT
Although the intent is clear, I think the language of R2280 makes this
evaluate to "MURPH*2, PRESENT*2".
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
> > The intent is proxied through Rule 2328, which has power 2.
>
> We've previously determined that the rules aren't an agreement. Is
> Agora as a whole? Does Agora count as having been "published"?
The "are the rules an agreement?" qu
Pavitra wrote:
> The intent is proxied through Rule 2328, which has power 2.
We've previously determined that the rules aren't an agreement. Is
Agora as a whole? Does Agora count as having been "published"?
On 07/08/2011 03:03 PM, Eric Stucky wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> Horton's Promise Report
>
> Was this effective, or just handy?
I think it should have been effective; I was technically the
officeholder of Horton (by assumption) at the time of publication.
On Jul 5, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Pavitra wrote:
> Horton's Promise Report
Was this effective, or just handy?
-Turiski
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Tanner Swett wrote:
> > 7086 3 G., etc. Jig-jiggery jig-jiggery
> MURPH
Proto: The Patent Title Decisionmaker-N, to be awarded by the Assessor to
a player if, at the time the voting period ends for a decision with an AI of
N, an index equal to the number of vali
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 07:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
> >>> ENDORSE AGORA
> >>
> >> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
> >> for something like
On 07/08/2011 02:41 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> On 07/08/2011 01:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> scshunt wrote:
>>>
On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
>> ENDORSE AGORA
>
> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "
Pavitra wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 01:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> scshunt wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
> ENDORSE AGORA
Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
for something like "
Bah, sent that to a-o instead of a-b by mistake. Oh well.
On 07/08/2011 01:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> scshunt wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises
ENDORSE AGORA
>>>
>>> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
>>> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F
13 matches
Mail list logo
