Pavitra wrote: > On 07/08/2011 01:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: >> scshunt wrote: >> >>> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote: >>>>>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises >>>>> ENDORSE AGORA >>>> >>>> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand >>>> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm >>>> interpreting this as ineffective due to lack of clarity. >>>> >>> >>> Agora is a person. This is, I believe, an attempt to endorse Agora in >>> its capacity as a person, although Agora is not an eligible voter. >> >> Rule 2339 is ineffective due to insufficient power. > > What? Noninstrument documents can declare themselves intended to be > persons; why would power 1 be insufficient when power 0 is sufficient?
They can intend all they want, but they need power >= 2 to prevent their intent from being trumped by Rule 2150.
