On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 07:14 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>>> 7101 3   Pavitra     Submitting Promises
> >>> ENDORSE AGORA
> >>
> >> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand
> >> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm
> >> interpreting this as ineffective due to lack of clarity.
> >>
> > 
> > Agora is a person. This is, I believe, an attempt to endorse Agora in 
> > its capacity as a person, although Agora is not an eligible voter.
> 
> Agreed. Legislation should override custom.

Casting a vote endorsing another voter is equivalent to...
                                  ^^^^^


Reply via email to