On 07/08/2011 01:38 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: > scshunt wrote: > >> On 07/07/11 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote: >>>>> 7101 3  Pavitra   Submitting Promises >>>> ENDORSE AGORA >>> >>> Given recent proposals, and the past use of "endorse Agora" as shorthand >>> for something like "if F>A then F else if A>F then A else P", I'm >>> interpreting this as ineffective due to lack of clarity. >>> >> >> Agora is a person. This is, I believe, an attempt to endorse Agora in >> its capacity as a person, although Agora is not an eligible voter. > > Rule 2339 is ineffective due to insufficient power.
What? Noninstrument documents can declare themselves intended to be persons; why would power 1 be insufficient when power 0 is sufficient?
