Pavitra wrote:
> Where, if anywhere, do we draw the line between Rolden and AGAINT?
Gratuitous: AGAINT was originally intended to mean "FOR" (CFJs
1260-61), the opposite of what common sense suggests it's a typo
for. "Rolden" was originally intended to mean "Rodlen", the same
as what common sen
OscarMeyr wrote:
> If need be, I destroy the Rests created in the Defendant's possession
> from the NoV in this case.
According to my records, e has none. H. Insulator BobTHJ?
c-walker wrote:
> 6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
>
> ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
>
>
> If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
It wasn't, so you don't.
Sgeo wrote:
6345 D 2 3.0 Pavitra Time travel
>>> FOR, unless there's reason to believe that this can hurt Agora.
> I change this vote to FOR.
Ineffective, you can't directly change a vote.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> Do it via a rule, rather than having the proposal floating around; I
> don't think a proposal can take effect at a time other than when it's
> adopted unless it can take predecence over a power-3 rule.
Er, it's something I've always been meaning to try. O
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 13:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> > Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> Quazie's probably chomping at the bit, so I'll say I planned to have the
> >>> next draft of Cards circulating
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> Quazie's probably chomping at the bit, so I'll say I planned to have the
>>> next draft of Cards circulating round about the 15th. �(remember idea is
>>> to not have them
2009/6/10 Charles Walker :
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Charles Walker
> wrote:
>>>
>>> 6346 O 2 1.0 coppro Ribbon oops
>>
>> ENDORSE... a trustworthy player
>
> If this was a valid vote, I retract it, and vote AGAINST instead.
>
If it was not a valid vote, does this read to simp
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Quazie's probably chomping at the bit, so I'll say I planned to have the
>> next draft of Cards circulating round about the 15th. �(remember idea is
>> to not have them go through until after the Birthday). �-G.
>
> We
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > IMO, Distributability hasn't been anywhere near as much of a disaster as
> > Committees were. My sense about it at the moment is that the idea is
> > worthwhile but the implementation is lacking; I'm not entirely sure how
>
ais523 wrote:
> IMO, Distributability hasn't been anywhere near as much of a disaster as
> Committees were. My sense about it at the moment is that the idea is
> worthwhile but the implementation is lacking; I'm not entirely sure how
> best to improve it, though. (Someone invent Distrib-u-matics a
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Quazie's probably chomping at the bit, so I'll say I planned to have the
> next draft of Cards circulating round about the 15th. (remember idea is
> to not have them go through until after the Birthday). -G.
We just have to keep distributabil
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:24 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> And yes, I know that supporting this pledge doesn't automatically mean
>>> voting for the rollback, but the pledge was associated with the re
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:24 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > And yes, I know that supporting this pledge doesn't automatically mean
> > voting for the rollback, but the pledge was associated with the repeal.
>
> Hey, I voted against the distribu
Tiger wrote:
> 2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan :
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra
to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having
received sufficient support, I m
That was what zooping did.
On 2009-06-10, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan :
>> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra
to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to suppo
2009/6/10 Benjamin Caplan :
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>>> I act on behalf of coppro to support this. I act on behalf of Pavitra
>>> to support this. I act on behalf of zeckalpha to support this. Having
>>> received sufficient support, I make this proposal dis
17 matches
Mail list logo
