On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 12:39 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > IMO, Distributability hasn't been anywhere near as much of a disaster as > > Committees were. My sense about it at the moment is that the idea is > > worthwhile but the implementation is lacking; I'm not entirely sure how > > best to improve it, though. (Someone invent Distrib-u-matics again?) > > Hey, Committees may have been somewhat confusing but at least they > didn't drown us in dozens of "I support" messages per week.
I prefer pragmatic messes (drowning in messages; those are normally sorted out either by proposal or by contract) to platonic messes (whereby something catches us out every so often that everyone had forgotten existed, with no warning on the lists at all). -- ais523
