On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 22:24 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> And yes, I know that supporting this pledge doesn't automatically mean >>> voting for the rollback, but the pledge was associated with the repeal. >> >> Hey, I voted against the distributability proposal from the beginning >> and after this trial I'm even more against it. > > IMO, Distributability hasn't been anywhere near as much of a disaster as > Committees were. My sense about it at the moment is that the idea is > worthwhile but the implementation is lacking; I'm not entirely sure how > best to improve it, though. (Someone invent Distrib-u-matics again?)
Quazie's probably chomping at the bit, so I'll say I planned to have the next draft of Cards circulating round about the 15th. (remember idea is to not have them go through until after the Birthday). -G.
