http://zenith.homelinux.net/assessor/proposals.php
(filters not yet implemented)
During my last tenure as Assessor, I generally accumulated votes
throughout the voting period, so I knew at any given point how many
players would have to be convinced to vote for/against a given
proposal to get it ad
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Sgeo wrote:
> I don't know if this is useful, but IRCnomic logs are at
> http://elliotthird.org:8080/logs/
> Also, I personally never agreed for IRCnomic to become an Agoran public
> contract, but as I am not currently a player of Agora, I don't know how much
> that counts for
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Iammars wrote:
I didn't have to mill anything. My ranches are 0, 4 & 5. I've been
waiting for this ever since got the 5 ranch.
You win.
-
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
OscarMeyr
I didn't have to mill anything. My ranches are 0, 4 & 5. I've been
waiting for this ever since got the 5 ranch.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Iammars wrote:
>
> > Copycat :P
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Benj
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Iammars wrote:
Copycat :P
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I harvest 5504, a Democratic proposal currently up for vote, to
gain 2
points.
Actually, one of us is a copyfront. I was getting ready for this with:
Wed,
Copycat :P
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I harvest 5504, a Democratic proposal currently up for vote, to gain 2
> points.
>
> -
> Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
> OscarMeyr
>
--
-Iammars
www.jmcteague.com
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1931
> >
> > == CFJ 1931 ==
> >
> >IRCNomic is a public con
Zefram wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> the plaintiff and defendant are the same first-class person,
>
> This is misusing the term "plaintiff", which is a civil law concept not
> appropriate in criminal law.
"Prosecutor"?
>> the pre-trial phase ends immediately.
>
> I think it's a bad id
On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:06 PM, Buddha Buck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:03 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welcome to the game, H. New Player Offhanded!
Why the H?
An abbreviation for "Honorable", I believ
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:03 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Welcome to the game, H. New Player Offhanded!
>
> Why the H?
An abbreviation for "Honorable", I believe.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome to the game, H. New Player Offhanded!
Why the H?
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Apr 29, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Clarion Rain wrote:
Hello.
I wish to register to play this game, which I keep reading good
things about. I also wish to be known by the name Offhanded in the
registrar's report and elsewhere in game.
Offhanded
Welcome to the game, H. New Player Offhanded!
Ed Murphy wrote:
> the plaintiff and defendant are the same first-class person,
This is misusing the term "plaintiff", which is a civil law concept not
appropriate in criminal law.
> the pre-trial phase ends immediately.
I think it's a bad idea to skip the pre-trial phase. Everyone is
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But your CFJ shows you understood the implications of your allegedly
>> reckless
>> action. And the more you try to explain, the more you show that you are
>> weighing the option
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But your CFJ shows you understood the implications of your allegedly reckless
> action. And the more you try to explain, the more you show that you are
> weighing the options carefully :) -Goethe
I think that at most it
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> But it's not a violation. As evidenced by the fact that you called the CFJ
>> on the matter, you've "understood and carefully weighed ... the full
>> implications of failing to
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But it's not a violation. As evidenced by the fact that you called the CFJ
> on the matter, you've "understood and carefully weighed ... the full
> implications of failing to perform" and so performed according to the
>
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Buddha Buck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wow. 2 new people in just a couple days! We're growing at a nice speed.
>> Welcome to Agora! (Join Fight Arena!)
>
> I'm not sure that Offhanded actually registered, though. I think g
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. 2 new people in just a couple days! We're growing at a nice speed.
> Welcome to Agora! (Join Fight Arena!)
I'm not sure that Offhanded actually registered, though. I think game
tradition is such that stating an intent or
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *Grumle Grumble wrong forum Grumble Grumble*
It doesn't matter; support is irrelevant in the current process
(installation by Agoran Consent went away), and acceptance of your own
nomination is assumed unless you explicitly decl
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Um, "CAN and SHOULD" != "MUST"...? -Goethe
>
> Well, that's the point. I contend that doesn't matter, that "a state
> of affairs whereby events have not proceeded as envisioned
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Um, "CAN and SHOULD" != "MUST"...? -Goethe
Well, that's the point. I contend that doesn't matter, that "a state
of affairs whereby events have not proceeded as envisioned by the
contract" can follow from violating a SHO
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> I make the following binding agreement:
>
> ==
>
> 1. This is a public contract.
>
> 2. This is a pledge.
>
> 3. Any party to this contract CAN leave it by announcement and SHOULD
> do so at
I accept my nomination, and support my nomination.
I support BobTHJ's nomination.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I nominate BobTHJ, comex, and woggle as Ambassador.
>
> I nominate Ivan Hope CXXVII, OscarMeyr, and Iammars as Herald.
>
> This begins th
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which parts of the Notary's responsibilities are too overwhelming?
> Maybe that office just needs some relief.
Nah, I'm just not feeling well at the moment and would enjoy some variety.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:04 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> If someone else takes the office of Notary next month and I am
>> nominated to any other offices later that month, I pledge to accept
>> one of the nominations.
>>
>> In other words,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:04 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If someone else takes the office of Notary next month and I am
> nominated to any other offices later that month, I pledge to accept
> one of the nominations.
>
> In other words, get me out of being Notary and I'll gladly do
Wow. 2 new people in just a couple days! We're growing at a nice speed.
Welcome to Agora! (Join Fight Arena!)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Clarion Rain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I wish to register to play this game, which I keep reading good things
> about. I also wish to be kn
On 4/28/08, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Change Rule 7 to read:
Not quite ended once and for all ;)
29 matches
Mail list logo
