On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But it's not a violation. As evidenced by the fact that you called the CFJ > on the matter, you've "understood and carefully weighed ... the full > implications of failing to perform" and so performed according to the > contract. -G.
I would think the fact that I called an equity case should be evidence that I think I've acted recklessly in that regard. -root
