On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> But it's not a violation. As evidenced by the fact that you called the CFJ >> on the matter, you've "understood and carefully weighed ... the full >> implications of failing to perform" and so performed according to the >> contract. -G. > > I would think the fact that I called an equity case should be evidence > that I think I've acted recklessly in that regard.
But your CFJ shows you understood the implications of your allegedly reckless action. And the more you try to explain, the more you show that you are weighing the options carefully :) -Goethe
