On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Um, "CAN and SHOULD" != "MUST"...? -Goethe
Well, that's the point. I contend that doesn't matter, that "a state of affairs whereby events have not proceeded as envisioned by the contract" can follow from violating a SHOULD. -root
