Output of 'man aliases':
"...
The /etc/aliases file contains the required aliases for the sendmail
command. ..."
There is no any reason the file /etc/aliases to be related neither to
Informix Dynamic Server nor to TSM client and/or TDP for Informix !
Did someone misled by the name have put this f
First I have to warn you that am completely unfamiliar with CommonStore and
had not yet opportunity to experiment with TDP for Oracle (I suspect your
SAP uses Oracle). But I was able to cheat TSM client (and TDP for Domino,
Informix) very easily:
1. created new directory and symbolic links for cli
eally files) are pre-formatted;
their
size does not change.
So what is the JFS overhead when TSM is writing into those files?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ds
This is not new at all. At least I have it in v4.1 and it is quoted in the
redbooks for v3.7 clients.
$ lslpp -L tivoli.tsm\*
tivoli.tsm.client.image.aix43.32bit
4.1.3.0CTSM Client - IMAGE Backup Client
The main goal of this is to backup raw (disk) devices. And
And usualy maintenance releases expect only to perform "within the
version/maintenance" actions/problem solving (and not thoroughly tested for
upgrade handling). So for the server I would recommend you to follow
multistep process:
3.7.x.y --> 4.1.0.0 --> 4.1.4.0 --> 4.1.4.x
Be aware that first ste
Yes, Tivoli does support this and if you look in any book "Using the
Backup-Archive Client", Chapter 2, Section "TSM Firewall Support" you can
find the answers to questions 1,3,4 .
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Kent Monthei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 28.11.2001 19:55:36
Please respond to "ADSM:
What do you expect from 4.2.2 client??
Main problem with RC=4 was fixed in 4.2.1.15, nothing serious on the
horizon and new features will come in 5.1 not in a maintenance, right?
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 27.11.2001 22:30:52
Please respond to "ADSM:
Herfried,
just a remark:
I did not installed TSM client on Netware (yet) and do not know its
directory structure but for other platforms I exclude C:\Tivoli\TSM or
/usr/tivoli/tsm (/opt/tivoli/tsm).
The reason is that I have to deal also with Tivoli Enterprise products. And
they use same sort of
Look in "Using the Windows Backup-Archive Client" guide:
"The tcpport option specifies a TCP/IP port address for a server. You can
obtain this address from your administrator. "
So putting a line 'tcpport 1501' in your dsm.opt file on NT server node
will help. And for HTTP you will have to use h
Katherine,
Let me try to convince you:
If you have a "large" database (whatever vendor) and "small" transaction
logs for it and some kind disaster strikes (you have *DISASTER* recovery
manager, don't you) your library. You can get back from vault the database
data but without the logs it is let's
If your users want to be able to restore *EVERY* version created during the
month you need VERExists=NOLimit and VERDeleted=NOLimit. And with backupset
generation on the first day (or night ;-) of a month you can keep
RETExtra=31 (hey friends, some months are longer `-) and RETOnly=31 (or
more). A
This is not exactly AIX limit, but JFS (1). AIX 5L with JFS2 supports up to
1 TB.
Try what if you restore not to file but to raw logical volume. AIX XCOFF
format promises up to 2^63 bytes file addressing limit. I cannot promise it
would help but you do not have too much options which can solve the
sets
in place of monthly archives.
I don't know about anyone else, but I am unable to perform my daily
backups during an archive weekend. Changing to Backup Sets will fix this
problem.
Joe Cascanette
The Cumis Group Limited
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL P
The message is obvious - you missed to upgrade a fileset. Look the versions
in output of 'lslpp -L tivoli.tsm\*'
And look specifically for the version of
tivoli.tsm.client.hsm.jfs.aix43.32bit fileset.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Joy Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 26.11.2001 22:08:49
Please
This depends on what you want to do with backupsets and how much space do
you have in the library.
If you are constrained in library slots - there is no other option than to
check backupsets out. If you want to use them for long term archives and/or
send them off-site - same answer. If you want to
If VTS is artifically configured TSM server backend this leads to another
question - virtual volumes performance.
We read recently on the list that TSM using VTS is having not so good
performance. Is this true or not I cannot prove and cannot have clear
opinion.
But virtual volumes are by definiti
On Windows elements start from 0 for both drives and slots. And because
3581 has only one drive it would be element 0. And you will have drive 0
and slot 0.
On UNIX drives and slots have different element numbers.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Mauricio Angelino Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 0
Do not overcomplicate this without need. Define two servers in dsm.sys
using two stanzas. Create two dsm.opt files, let's say dsm_odd.opt and
dsm_even.opt pointing to each stanza in dsm.sys and start the client with
different DSM_CONFIG environment variable. Or even start both clients.
Zlatko Kra
You can have more than one TSM client directory (with dsm.sys within) and
point to them using different $DSM_DIR values.
Also you can have more than one server stanzas in single dsm.sys and point
to them with different dsm.opt files or as Nicholas Cassimatis pointed to
me recently "dsmc sched -se=
Hint 1: Are you using PASSWORDAccess Generate?
Hint 2: I had the same error trying to start onbar when logged as ordinary
user and switched to root using "su". The problem disappeared when "su -"
was used.
My environment: TSM server 4.1.4.1, TSM client 4.1.3, DPI v4.1, IDS 7.31UC4
Zlatko Krastev
Where are you getting this throughput - LAN or SAN?
LAN-free storage agent transfer relatively small ammounts of metadata over
LAN and you cannot achive best possible peak rates there. For LAN data
transfer you should be able to achieve at least 7-8 MB/s so the problem
could be with TCP/IP setting
Probably it isn't so simple but what is "volume of clients" and is it more
than MAXSessions option in your dsmserv.opt (default is 25 if not set) ?
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Suad Musovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11.12.2001 21:34:09
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECT
DELete VOLHistory TODate= Type=STGDelete
According to my docs it ought to be possible on MVS server as well.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michel Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 14.12.2001 11:23:31
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Su
They DO NOT provide same type and level of performance as ESS does!
The reason is very simple - if they do IBM would not put this massive
ammount of memory in ESS. ESS Internally consists of two "clusters", in
other words RS/6000 H50 or H70 with specific AIX&HACMP version. Those nodes
connect to S
Dear Mr. O'Sullivan,
If I may to describe my opinion for your note it would be using old
Bulgarian sentence - "Do not try to sell cucumbers to cucumber trader!".
Congratulations to you and your company for the investments and interest in
TSM. However my participation in ADSM-L list should not be
It is up to the (file) server administrator how he/she will setup, tune and
maintain the node.
1 TB of data can be put on a single filesystem - it is up to you. In my
practice I've even seen an Oracle server on Netware with three (separate)
disks compromising a single very large SYS: volume !?! Wi
What do you mean with "archive" ?
In TSM terms "archive" means file version on the filesystem at the moment
of archive creation. The file is transferred *again* to the server even
when there is "active" version. Backupset does nearly the same using last
backed up version (which ought to be current
Demetrius,
IMHO this is very cheap and too much shifted report with nothing analytical
in it. Set of coloured bars with different tags on them. Not good even for
advertisement. Of course you have the right to like it. But it even does
not answer to the initial thread question.
This might be call
Where comes this "divide by two" rule from? Is this something related only
to 3590 drives?
For SCSI this cannot be true because there would be no way to have 5-6
disks on a bus with this "rate divide".
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
"Cook, Dwight E (SAIC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 20.12.2001 17:
Just the same:
DELete VOLHistory TODate= Type=STGNew
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michel Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 17.12.2001 16:24:58
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: VOLHIST contains devclasses not in use
If your network capacity "greatly exceeds the clients ability to send data"
then your network rate should "greatly exceed" the data read (on the node)
and write (on the server) rate. Consequently aggregate rate has also to be
"greatly exceeded". The only explanation I can find to the numbers you'r
And why not just define DDS3 drive to TSM as Steve already pointed. And why
to use NT Backup of TSM is already there.
This is a small installation (if 3581 autoloader is enough for them) and
manual daily replacement of the cartridge in the DDS3 drive should not be a
big problem.
Zlatko Krastev
IT
You are entering into same problem old versions of TDP products have - all
versions are having unique names and do not expire. You will need to write
your own program using the TSM APIs to expire those files. Or dig down the
Veritas manuals can it expire them for you (is it really TSM aware) by a
278
Troy, MI 48098
* phone: 248-265-4596 (8-365)
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NamedPipe settings on W2K client
Where are you getting this t
select node_name,sum(physical_mb) as "Physical",sum(logical_mb) as
"Logical" -
from occupancy -
group by node_name
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Robert Ouzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 20.12.2001 13:18:49
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
wrong.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Zlatko [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22.12.2001 23:55
Sent by: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Please Explain
If your network capacity "greatly
Jerry,
this would turn TSM into "always full backup" destroying nearly all of its
benefits (and will not resolve the problem). I would recommend to both you
and Angelos to read the nice redbook "Tivoli Storage Management Concepts"
(SG24-4877-02 from http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/). This would allow
I do not know will this work in ADSM 3.1 (but it ought to). At least it
works in my TSM 4.1.
1. (optional) Format log volume files - if on Windows or prefer to use
files instead of raw devices
2. Mirror the volume(s) in question using "DEFine LOGCopy" command (in my
test "def logc /dev/rtsm_log0 /
The other meaning for "backup window" is the time period during which you
need to complete the backup. For example server is very busy during
business hours so backup can be performed only during the night. Or if
server is accessed from both Europe and Americas offices of the company
backup window
I also remeber such problem so have searched through my mail list archive
folder and really found a thread "P2000 questions" on 14.09 started by ...
"Coviello, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and answered by ... Robin Sharpe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :-)))
And guess what - the subject was slightly different b
Or just the opposite - a volume with data checked in as scratch, tried to
be used and (auto)changed by TSM to private to prevent scratch volumes
allocation become blocked.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Doug Thorneycroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03.01.2002 00:08:56
Please respond to "[EMAIL PROT
Be aware that the "filesystem" is not equal to "all directories and files
under the mount point tree"!
So continuing with your example and assuming we have filesystems /work,
/work/data and /work/data/martine:
a file /work/dummy_file will give us FILESPACE_NAME='/work', HL_NAME='/',
LL_NAME='dummy
(1) is an option but time consuming (3200 tapes!)
(2) might not be an option - it depends how paranoic you are. If someone
(usually a virus) fills sector 0 on a PC disk with garbage this does not
automatically mean the data is lost. But it might take too much efforts. If
the tapes are not degaused
Let try to define it further - what do you (or "Tivoli" you have contacted)
mean of "single hardware platform" ?
For me this means type of hardware, i.e. IBM RS/6000, HP9000, PC, etc. I do
not believe that buying enough points for a server and three MgSysLAN
licenses will allow me to define nod
Yes, I know its probably too late. I did not read my mail for nearly a
week. Anyway my $.02 :
What about doing it by yourself?
Register at Tivoli site (http://www.tivoli.com/support/maintenance.html) to
obtain customer ID/password and later go to Management Points calculator
(www.tivoli.com/suppo
1. AFAIK, no! onbar uses single thread, logs are not splitted for backup
and are processed one-by-one. As a very wild guess maybe if the next log
gets full before the current is backed up second onbar process can start
for it and some kind of parallelism can happen. Just guess, do not rely on
this
There is known problem when upgrading from 3.x to 4.1 and you must use
"CONVERT ARCHIVE REORG=Yes" for each node. The other approach
is to start at least once the GUI client (usualy you do not backup the
server manually but through command line client, right). This was included
in 4.1.2 or 4.1.3
Guys,
Why to wonder which is the filesystem filled, it is so simple - /usr.
1. AIX was recently upgraded. If upgrade filesets are committed the
increase in /usr usage is small. If "apply and save replaced files" you
will get nearly twice the size.
2. TSM is installed in /usr/tivoli/tsm/server,
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Zlatko
Krastev/ACIT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What qualifies as
an in use license?
Sent by:
The TDP for Notes and for Domino are different. I do not know is there an
upgrade converting your TDP for Notes licenses to TDP for Domino. But you
still must have the installation media of TDP for Notes. And you can
quickly bring up a Domino server (even on your NT/W2k workstation) running
v4.5 o
- Try to reformat the DB volume(s) (files, not DB backup tape).
- Try what if you delete /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dsmserv.dsk
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michel David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 14.01.2002 11:41:29
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL
1. xhost + - as Ed pointed this is the most often the
reason. X does have some security at the end.
2. Ensure "telnet 6000" from the node does connect and firewall
does not block it.
Or investigate usage of web client on those nodes.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
brian welsh <[EMAIL PROTECTE
the letter would imply that only one MGSYSSAN license is required, but
your guess is as good as mine here.
Wanda got it right in her note yesterday.
William Mansfield
Senior Consultant
Solution Technology, Inc
Zlatko
Krastev/A
For those who had not registered and obtained Tivoli CustomerID the page is
just link to
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/flash_hba.html
BTW: Mark, just another argument against TSM on Windows - this and alert in
October were Windoze only. And the previous was about the nice Plug'N'Pray
You already have the answer - log mode is normal. In this mode log is used
only to rollback a transaction. On commit the log is cleaned. So when there
is no activity the log must be 0% (or at least very close).
The drawback is that any transaction after last DBB is lost in case of
major failure. T
Mark,
Lets compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges. What could you
say in response to that:
"Your sluggish Windows 3.1 even does not have own TCP/IP stack but I do
have IPSec in AIX 4.3.3"
How many years have passed since Compaq bought DEC and even now HP buys
Compaq (alright, they
Kirti,
If the retension period change has to be performed for all nodes in this
domain (I hope those nodes are Oracle only) the copygroup has to be
updated.
If only one node needs this change I would suggest you to define new domain
with appropriate ARCHRETension setting, rename the node to _old,
If I understood your question right - you have enough disk space on the
server to hold *ALL* backups and want this copied to tape and single tape
cartridge can hold all backups too.
If this is the case you can define COPY Storage pool on the tape library
(be it manual library, i.e. standalone driv
1. Yes. In ADSM client 3.1 there is XBSA library libXapi.a with bsashr10.o
in it. In v3.7 and later it is sold separately and is called TDP for
Informix. For AIX 4.2.1 the latest client available is ADSM v3.1.
2. You do not need to reformat the hard drive to install new application.
Look at ADSM
But we unfortunately are discussing the server. It is TSM influenced. The
clients are chosen from application requirements perspective.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
"Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 18.01.2002 22:33:04
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
What is the reason to have the tape unavailable? If is just the lack of
slots in the library then the ADSM/TSM way to do it is overflow location as
Stuart pointed.
If it is broken tape or similar - restore volume 20 from copypool and
then perform reclamation.
Think for status 'UNAVAILABLE' as
Isn't TSM v4.2 for OS/390 an option for you. It could leverage your current
ESCON 3590 inverstments with the new functionality.
If you are one of the shops which prefer one-time charge for mainframes,
are Linux-oriented and avoid MVS, then in my personal opinion you nearly
hit the main reason not
Look for redbook SG24-6110-00
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
"Rupp Thomas (Illwerke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11.01.2002 18:39:38
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:What changed from TSM Server 3.7.2. to 4.1.1?
Hi TSM'
This is good idea but I think there are other aspects to take into account:
- in case of RAID array failure you should have a copy pool to restore. You
can make file copypool but you cannot send disks off-site so easy. And how
to perform reclamation of off-site disks! So complete avoidance of tape
Arnaud,
--> 6h1 machine, 2Gb memory ...
--> ... I increased bufpoolsize from 151552 to 524288 (where my performance
problems began)!
512k pages, 4 kB each equals 2 GB. So you left no space for AIX, file
buffers, TSM code, etc. Consequences: excessive paging and performance
degradation.
--> Vmtun
Both DB2 and any backup sized to 130 GB are good candidates for
direct-to-tape. Slight modification of your TSM policies may help you
without buying more disks.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Tommy Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11.02.2003
ace.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Zlatko Krastev/ACIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.02.2003 03:51
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Eric,
"new" product ITSM for Databases is just a new licensing scheme for:
- TDP for Informix
- TDP for MS SQL
- TDP for Oracle
ITSM for DBs 5.1.5 is successor version of TDP for Oracle v2.2. Versions
3.x and 4.x are skipped to aligh numbers with ITSM ones.
Actually in ITSM for DBs v5.1.5 TDPO com
You did not provided version and OS of the server. Can you provide also
some information about your library - vendor, model, number of drives,
types of drives (it is possible the library is brand new with LTO2 or
upgraded with mixed LTO/DLT). Output of some commands may show the
situation in detail
Carsten, Paul,
the three biggest contributors to TSM's DB size are tables BACKUPS,
ARCHIVES and CONTENTS. First two show what was backed up/archived and the
third show where the objects are stored. Everything hitting the TSM server
is either a backup or an archive or a space-managed file. Usually
It could be but is a very rare situation. And you do not have the
reusedelay parameter for diskpools, do you.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Sam Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22.02.2003 01:03
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
rary/hardware_docs/sa23/2325
> 50.pdf
> pg 24
> Will try on new tsm server
>
> Thanks Zlatko
>
> Jose Rivera
> Ris Infrastructure
> 908-298-3568
> 1-800-PAGE-MCI#1376812
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
0. (!) cease operations and backup the DB
1. upgrade old server to ITSM 5.1.5
2. backup the upgraded DB
3. attach the library to new server
4. restore DB from the library (it might be necessary to play with library
definition)
Continue business as usual
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
TSMadm <[
What's the point? I see nothing buggy here except DDSPOOL not in the
storage hierarchy (which might be intentional).
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21.02.2003 17:20
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
I am surprised to see many answers to this thread not commenting the
standard TSM functionality sufficient to achieve the goal:
- HSM client sends the data in a storage pool. That storage pool can be
backed up to a copypool. If this is a storage hierarchy within the server
(diskpool migration to ta
So let me repeat in short to realize what you've done:
- you had a TSM server with lot of data (45 GB DB, 1000 desktops and
unknown number of servers, etc.);
- you had "vario(u)s errors" and intentionally ignored them;
- you preferred to abandon the supported export/import and step deeply in
unexpl
How you did the upgrade (4.1.6 -> 5.1.6.2 or 4.1.6 -> 5.1.0.0 -> 5.1.6.0
-> 5.1.6.2 or otherwise)?
What is the fileset and version for the ITSM device driver?
You hope wrong or you hope normal :-)
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
GUILLAUMONT Etienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
Todd,
For the original question: up to now majority of our customers have
Storage Agent nodes and we have no problems with upgrades. Mostly these
are AIX servers (Windows ones are smaller and go over LAN) and life with
AIX is very easy. You can perform upgrade during the day without *any*
signific
Paul,
I am not sure it is a public/private encryption (RSA). My guess is for
licensing reasons 10 years ago DES was used and that part of the code
wasn't changed since. Guessing further I would say some hash-function
takes node's name and password as arguments and produces DES key. Same
function i
--> ... or do I need to create seperate mgmtclass and bind those files to new mgmt
class ...
You have the answer yourself but are not self-confident. The answer is
correct.
- define new class (I usually name it LOGS), set serialization to dynamic
in backup copygroup
- yes, activate the policy set
Interpretation ought to be correct except the number. 98% used with 0.2%
migratable means 0.2% real data and 97.8% cached. If backup requires space
and file is not larger than maxsize/poolsize cached data ought to be
purged.
Verify for (order of probability):
1. maxsize limit on the diskpool
2. ex
Yes, but someone have changed dsm.sys and set client's port to be 1580. If
dsmcad is started before rc.adsmserv in inittab ...
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
shekhar Dhotre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20.02.2003 16:17
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist
5 years is an easy one. Get LTO or 3590 or 9840/9940 and you have done the
job. The problems can come if go closer to 10 years (other issues to
consider as well). And if you have to achieve 20-30 years there is only
one answer - permanent WORMs + 2-3 (!) copypools.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
--> By the time I was apprised of the situation, the activity log had already
cycled past the relevant entries.
--> The retention policy, set by the IT Director for the particular Division
is 5/1/60/90
To prevent further frustration if I was you I would perform an export of
all node's data to be o
Look at section "Logging Events to the Tivoli/Enterprise Console" in TSM
5.1 Administrator's Guide.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Dan Carlo Freitas Peres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17.02.2003 11:16
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Since v5.1 licensing is based on processors - no matter are they server or
client. Having 10 processor licenses you can have 1 server and 9 clients
or 10 servers for the same price. The price for maintaining these 10
servers
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
"Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTE
doesn't function is not normal ! :-))
regards
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RGB Technologie
Parc d'Innovation, Bâtiment PYTHAGORE
11 Rue Jean SAPIDUS
67400 ILLKIRCH
Tél : 03 90 40 60 60
Fax : 03 90 40 60 61
Zlatko
TED]>
24.02.2003 17:21
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Need ideas for offsite copy of HSM tapes
At 12:08 PM +0200 2/23/03, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
>- HSM client sends the data in a storage poo
I would say it *is* the right approach! To make a fair comparison you have
to get information from all competitors. Otherwise you will make the
decision
Nearly all answers on this thread point to the TSM vs. NetBackup
comparison report from Progressive Strategies Inc. And all miss that the
documen
Filespace deletion removes both active and inactive versions thus removing
more entries than expiration in the DB.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
"Stapleton, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09.03.2003 23:21
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Man
With TSM v3.7 you can do node export/import through tapes only.
If you can afford upgrade to v5.1.5 (or later) you can export+import on
the fly through server-server communication.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Ben Geldenhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROT
Justin,
a delayed answer but still an answer.
1. Can we move optical platters out of one library into another ...
Yes, you can but as a whole. You can replace a library with bigger one,
checkout *all* libvolumes from old one, checkin them in new lib and update
device class to point new library. (
The explanation is pretty simple:
1. TSM is installed using raw Logical Volume (LV).
2. I would guess /dev/rtsmvglv11 is DB or Log volume (if it was diskpool
TSM ought to start and have the volume offline).
3. Someone have enlarged the logical volume using "chlv" command in AIX -
look at the differ
Michelle,
it *is* one PP! Actually TSM measures DB in pages of 4kB. Thus 16384 pages
is exactly 64 MB == 1 PP.
If you have TSM mirrored volume just rename the LV and start TSM. It fill
not find the LV, use the mirror and that is.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Michelle Wiedeman <[EMAIL PROTEC
I would second Allen's opinion about your manager (if you dare you can
show him both responses) - beat him with all the manuals on the head until
it opens to different opinions.
I would understand requirement to keep offsite copies longer than onsite
ones but hard to see good business reason for th
Sias,
the snapshot *does not* clear the log. It is a snapshot, not a backup. Its
goal is to make copy of the DB without touching the Full+Incremental+Log
chain.
Look at the Administrator's Guide:
"A snapshot database backup is a full database backup that does not
interrupt the current full and inc
It is possible but has its limitations. I even made TSM working with
single drive (manual lib) for both primary and copypool. In such cases
periodic selective (forced fulls) might be of some use.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Etienne Brodeur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manag
2176000 - 1787528 = 388472 empty pages
388472 * 4096 bytes/page = 1591181312 bytes = 1553888 kB = 1517,46875 MB
Maximum reduction is 1492 MB, thus the fragmentation is 1,7% - you ought
to happy with it.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Farren Minns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
Steve,
I assume you have point-based TSM v4.2 licenses (you are talking about
MgSysSAN licenses). TSM v4.2 does not include licenses for Tivoli SANergy
and your company should acquire that product separately.
If you had current maintenance agreement when ITSM v5.1 went out (April
2002) or re-estab
Incorrect. The question was about SAN-sharing of disk not tape. "Managed
Library" is for *tape* libraries having more than certain ammount of
drives and media slots. For disk sharing Tivoli SANergy license is needed
and "Managed Library" *is not* required (regardless of number of hard disk
drives).
301 - 400 of 633 matches
Mail list logo
