FYI, if you use the 4.1 client with a 3.1 server, you will not get a backup
of your registry.
I suggest using the 3.7.2 client instead.
-Original Message-
From: Fab System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANS 1943E
Hi
We
We have 2 3494's in house, attached to OS/390 for use with DFHSM (soon to be
used with a TSM server as well).
The oldest is 3494 is 2 years old. We also have STK 9710 robots in house
for use with TSM on AIX, so I've worked with both.
The 3494 isnt' quite as fast as the STK robots, but it holds m
The answer is, because they do.
I thought this started with the 3.7 client, not the 3.1.0.7 client, but I
can't swear to that.
The client now starts 2 sessions, the data flows on one, the control
information flows on the other.
The client may actually start MORE than 2 sessions, if it decides t
Q libv only shows tapes that are in your library - once DRM spits the tape
out, it won't show up there.
Q vol only shows tapes that are in storage pools.
Your tape is some other type, probably a data base backup tape (since DRM
spits those out along with the copy pool tapes, by default.)
Non-st
Part of the problem is, who is the "user".
Under WinnT, scheduled backups generally run under the System account. Any
USER account may or may not be logged on at the time backups are run. On
UNIX, the backups generally run as root.
What we do is query the eventlog on the server end, and genera
No such luck!
DST starts the FIRST Sunday in April.
(perhaps appropriately, this year, it's April 1)
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows NT/2000 Daylight Savings Time Problem
Several people have mailed me directly to ask for copies of my disaster
recovery procedures, so I have posted copies of them to the TSM Scripts
Depot at www.coderelief.com.
* Click the link to Scripts Discussion Forum, then
* click the link to Tivoli Storage Manager scripts,
* t
Is true. We just did a 3.7.2 to 3.7.4 upgrade, AIX 4.3.3. Something has
changed in Tivoli's install script, and the device type changes from "tape"
to "ADSMtape", so that you have to delete the drives and add them back, but
rmdev -dl doesn't work, you have to use odmdelete.
I've also done 2.x t
cipal
The Timken CompanyGlobal Software Support
P.O. Box 6927 Data Management
1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390
Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.timken.com
-Original Message-----
From: Prath
And in times past when I got utterly frustrated and never could get the
filespec working, I have resorted to renaming the filespace on the server
end - to something like DOG, that isn't hard to identify or type!
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monda
Well, I'll take a stab at this.
I know when you do a DB restore, the same disk layout (i.e., number of
DBVOLS) is NOT required, been there done that.
I believe the requirement is that the RESTORE TO data base (and recovery
log) must have AT LEAST as much space available as the original, although
The tape should be labelled, but not checked in.
Also check your DEVCLASS (q devclass class8mm f=d), make sure the MOUNTLIMIT
is set to 1 or DRIVES.
Then take the tape OUT of the drive so TSM will see the drive is free.
Then issue your BACKUP DB command.
TSM will put a message in the ACTLOG (or th
IC29444 is an APAR number; here is the text from IBMLINK, although it
doesn't say much.
(Best viewed in a fixed font:)
Item IC29444
APAR Identifier .. IC29444 Last Changed..01/03/16
PERFORMANCE PROBLEM DURING BACKUP WHEN ANTI VIRUS SOFTWARE IS
ACTIVE
Symptom .. IN INC
ype DeviceON LINE
---
---
LIB8MMDRV8MM8MM /dev/mt0 Yes
it shows that the drive is there. Am at loss again.
Arshad.
>From: "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "
lable 00-00-0S-6,0 5.0 GB 8mm Tape Drive
mt0 Available 00-00-0S-6,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
Yeah, I really don't have a clue too.
Salman
>From: "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Yeah, been there done that about 9 months ago, and on an SP node, I think at
AIX 4.3.2.
Nothing sneaky;
Just as you are doing, we reloaded the image from a mksysb tape, then
restored each filesystem from TSM to get current.
If you've got multiple tape drives, open another window and start the
res
1) No, they are only backed up once. (Assuming of course, that your BACKUP
STGPOOL command specified the same destination copy pool both times.).
BACKUP STGPOOL is an incremental backup; TSM checks the DB to decide whether
any file in the primary pool does or does not already exist in the copy
poo
You can get that result if you are not root.
I have also had similar problems if my AIX session was running low on
available colors - if you have Netscape open, try closing it to free more X
screen resources.
-Original Message-
From: Blaine Gilbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon
I don't know.
But here's a simple test.
Go to your AIX box, find a file that is at least 100 MB, preferably 500MB.
Send it to your OS/390 mainframe via a simple FTP, and time it.
Do it 3 or 4 times to make sure you are getting consistent timings.
FTP is about the simplest data transfer you can d
The 4.1.2.12 code is a complete replacement install for the client.
And 4.1.2.12 includes all prior fixes.
So you just flop it on top of the previous install, since you are already at
a 4.x client.
(Remember to stop the scheduler service before you start the install
though.)
-Original Messag
You can set mount retention to 0.
I don't know of any reason not to, in a robotic library.
-Original Message-
From: Poehlman, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Export Node Mount Waits
TO *SMers - All,
New to this so pl
What happens if you run an AUDIT vol?
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Anyone know a debug way of deleting a disk volume...?
Ok, over the years I've had disk failures that have left
Ditto. No problem with J's &K's together.
And the 3590E's read and write the J's just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590-B1A to 3590-E1A
>Now the question, we hav
We do it for some small machines. It works. The answer is, of course "it
depends on your situation."
These are small machines that aren't terribly critical - if we lost one, we
could take 24 hours to rebuild it and the users would still be happy (give
that their other choice is to have to recust
Yikes -
Installing 4.1.2.12 on a Win2K machine, when we click the INSTALL button in
the wizard, a box pops up with:
!Internal Error 2755,1632,\\pathname\Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi
We have installed 4.1.2.12 on other WIn2K machines with no problem.
Not being a Windows Wizard myself, I h
to the J's as 256 tracks?
-----Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3590-B1A to 3590-E1A
Ditto. No problem with J's &K's together.
And the 3590E's read an
Suppose you did restore an Oracle data base that was 7 years old.
How confident are you that your Oracle software could still read it?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Long Term Archive fo
Enter Q OCC
That shows the same information as auditocc, but broken down by storage
pools.
-Original Message-
From: Blaine Gilbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Export Question
I am working on an Export process and I a
I agree -
I normally do a full nightly (DB is only 16 GB).
But I have the DB backuptrigger set to allow incrementals.
If TSM decides to fire a DB backup because the log is getting full, I want
that to complete ASAP!
-Original Message-
From: Garrison, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
For each of your DESTROYED volumes, do RESTORE VOLUME PREVIEW=YES.
It will show you which of the offsite volumes is needed to rebuild the
onsite tape.
Bring back the volumes shown in PREVIEW.
Do RESTORE VOLUME on the onsite damaged cartridges, which will copy data
from the copy pool tapes back to
Well, I can tell you a few things.
We run TSM on an AIX 4.3.3 box, using 9840 drives in a 9710 library driven
by ACSLS.
We are not sharing the robot with any other application, but I think the
setup will be the same.
The only thing that passes through ACSLS is robotic commands, not data.
The back
Removing the STGNEW and STGDELETE volhist entries does not affect any data
that may be on those tapes.
Those entries do not participate in any type of DB recovery, either.
The only thing I know of that those entries are used for is to provide a
good idea what tapes need to be audited, if you ever
I was doing that for a while - a copy pool offsite and a copy pool onsite.
But the only reason I was doing that was because our drives/media were
unreliable, and I had to do RESTORE VOLUMES at least once a week. So having
the onsite copy pool kept me from making a LOT of trips to the vault.
Now
Yikes, I didn't know that! Thanks for pointing it out.
If you think you have tapes disappearing and don't want to do a manual
audit, you can write an audit program/script.
1)Pull a list of tapes that are physically in the library: q libv
2)Pull a list of tapes that are in DRM VAULT status: q
Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (240) 539-7175
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com
www.storserver.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Prathe
Some admin commands are not allowed for scheduling as admin schedules.
However, you CAN schedule a RUN command that executes a TSM server script.
.
So if you put your CHECKOUT command in a named TSM server script, you should
be able to schedule the script as "run scriptname".
I schedule my CHECK
ng to Kelly instead of the listserv.
Thanks,
Glenn MacIntosh
Manager of Technical Services
Sobeys Inc.
123 Foord St.
Stellarton, Nova Scotia
(902) 752-8371 Ext. 4017
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 1:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
There was a bug that caused TSM to hang coming up at "Recovery log mount in
progress". And it just never comes up. I know it hit the NT server and AIX
server at 3.7.2, and was fixed in 3.7.4. Not sure about OS/390, but check
into it.
I expect you need to upgrade to 3.7.4, or you will be subje
If this is a new problem, I also suggest you check the AIX errpt to see if
there is anything bad going on with your disk
-Original Message-
From: Chibois, Herve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration
Hi Bert,
Yes, it does no harm to switch to ROLLFORWARD mode in mid-stream, it just
works.
It does fire an extra DB backup; or maybe that's when you switch BACK from
ROLLFORWARD to NORMAL, I forget.
The amount of log space you need depends on the amount of activity rather
than the DB size, so it's hard to
A while back someone posted a section of the 4.1 server README file (see
below).
Says that TSM 4.1 doesn't count license as "in use" if the client has been
inactive for 30+days.
Does that mean you only need to pay for enough licenses to cover the "in
use" count now?
*
Alas, "it depends".
What I was told is:
If your licenses were under a maintenance agreement at the time 4.1, came
out, you may be entitled to the upgrade for free - depends on the contract.
If not, the deadline for a price break on upgrading to 4.1 was Dec. 31,
2000.
So you will have to buy the
When I have to do something like that, I have TSM generate the commands I
need by putting fixed text into an SQL select statement. For example:
select 'delete association', node_name , domain_name, schedule_name from
associations where CHG_TIME>'2001-04-17 00:00'
That SELECT generates output
If these tapes are really gone, you know you can't get the data back any
way, and you just want to make TSM forget all about them and purge all the
DB entries for them (and their backed up files), then do:
DELETE VOL blah DISCARDDATA=YES.
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Clark [mailto
No.
Each TSM server has it's own data base.
There is no way to merge two TSM data bases.
What you would have to do is to EXPORT each of the clients from server A,
then IMPORT them individually into server B.
What a lot of people do, is just point the clients from server A to server
B, and let
Hi John,
I would just pull the volsers of the libvolumes that are defined as
DBBACKUP:
select volume_name from libvolumes where last_use='DbBackup'
Then look and see if they still live ANYWHERE in volume history:
select * from volhistory where volume_name='XX'
Assuming these are physicall
just watch and make sure they get used.'
I wonder what made this happen hmmm.
jt
-Original Message-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration of DbBackup, Volhist and Libvolume status.
Hi J
What type of tape?
The "write protected" error is because someone has physically flipped the
write-protect tab on the tape cartridge.
But the tab is in a different place depending on the tape type...
-Original Message-
From: Larry Way [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25,
No.
Each DB backup, full or incremental, starts a new tape.
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Incremental DBbackups
Hello all,
A question about incremental DBbackups. If I run 10
Yes, if the file still exists on the client machine, and TSM determines that
it no longer has a backup of the file, it will back up that file again
during the next cycle.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Davenport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL P
Hi Geoff,
The one hard and fast rule here, is NEVER CREATE A SITUATION WHERE A
HARDWARE FAILURE COULD DESTROY YOUR RECOVERY LOG. Beyond that, the answer
to everything else is pretty much "it depends".
If you search the archives of this list, you will find that IBM/Tivoli's
position has always
And it depends on the type of DB. TSM only supports a couple in LAN-free
mode.
-Original Message-
From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 500GB Backup
You need a SAN in place to use the LAN free backup.
TSMUG (formerly DCAF) is the Tivoli Storage Manager User Group for
Baltimore, Washington DC, and Northern Virginia.
Please join us at our next meeting on Thursday, May 17, 2001, at the
beautiful T. Rowe Price campus in Owings Mills, Maryland.
Come and hear our speaker, Chris Dedham of EC Solutions
Are you sure you are trying to restore the file with the same level of
client code that backed it up?
-Original Message-
From: Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 5:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: restore errors
Anyone know what causes this? and
Yep, that will cause the error you saw.
You can restore old data with a newer client.
But you usually can't restore data backed up with a higher level client
using lower level code.
-Original Message-
From: Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:46 AM
To:
ANybody successfully backed up files that were encrypted by the Win2K file
encryption mechanism?
We are getting an access violation by the scheduler, the system account
doesn't appear to have access to encrypted files.
But I'm clueless as to what privilege is required.
I posted our procedures to the scripts depot at www.coderelief.com.
Read carefully, though - it matters whether your server level is 3.7.2 or
above.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ho
I believe starting at AIX 4.2.something, nohup actually changed rules; you
have to also < /dev/null. The example below is in the README for the AIX
client, and it works for me on AIX 4.3.3:
nohup dsmc sched >/dev/null 2>&1 < /dev/null &
-Original Message-
From: Dearman, Richard
To: [E
Geoff, you may have hit a bug that comes up occasionally on this list.
I sometimes (very infrequently) have tapes that show 100% reclaimable,
no files left on them. But TSM will not send them back to scratch, or
reclaim them, or even let you do a DELETE with DISCARD=YES.
If that is the case, bri
It is not uncommon with the 3.7.2 client running on Win2K to misreport
events.
Most people have reported their problem resolved by installing the 4.1.2.12
client code.
Go to www.adsm.org, search the ADSM 2001 bucket for this: "which client
version is best".
On Feb. 6 I posted a list of client b
We have had several Windows Terminal servers at various times.
Treat them just as any other NT machine, as far as TSM is concerned.
No special handling required.
-Original Message-
From: Gibb, Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
We normally install the TSM Scheduler on all our machines using the default
SYSTEM account.
For a Win2K Pro machine, is there any disadvantage/fallout to using the
person's regular network logon account, instead of the SYSTEM account?
(assuming it is a member of the local ADMINISTRATORs group).
ing W2K SP1, TSM 4.12.12.
Basically an encrypted file prevents another user from reading the file but
that user can still backup, copy, delete the file etc, as long as they have
rights.
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-----
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue
I haven't tried it myself, but I don't think so. Tivoli states that the
Windows MACHINE ID must be the same when restoring "system objects", not
just the TSM nodename.
.
-Original Message-
From: Hrouda Tomáš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
To upgrade to any 3.7 or 4.1 server from 3.1, you need the CD, which means
you need $.
I don't believe there is any 3.1 server that is still supported by Tivoli.
-Original Message-
From: Block, Clemens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
There is a messages manual.
Go to the TSM web site, look for the link on the right that says "product
manuals".
http://www.tivoli.com/products/index/storage_mgr/
However, the quickest way to find the message text for a client, is to ask
the client.
* Start the COMMAND LINE version of the c
I've lost track - has the 5 GB limit on the size of the recovery log been
lifted in the V4.1 server?
The 5 GB limit is killing me here - it would be a good reason for me to
upgrade
No.
Just marking the tapes destroyed will NOT change the data base entries for
the files on the tape.
(You can even mark the tape back to READWRITE, if it is still available.
All that DESTROYED does is make it not-mountable)
Case 1:
If you have another copy of the data in a COPY pool, the approp
week, and our instructor says the limit in 4.1 is
5.4 GB.
<<< "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/16 4:40p >>>
I've lost track - has the 5 GB limit on the size of the recovery log been
lifted in the V4.1 server?
The 5 GB limit is killing me here - it would be a good reason for me to
upgrade
needs.
Tom
> -Původní zpráva-
> Od: Prather, Wanda [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Odesláno: 16. května 2001 22:38
> Komu: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Předmět: 5 GB limit on Recovery Log
>
> I've lost track - has the 5 GB limit on the size of the recovery log been
&
nical sales rep yesterday that development
is working on getting around that limitation. No time frame, though.
-lisa
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/16/2001 04:22 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
For windows, there is an option called QUIET that you can put in dsm.opt. I
don't use it, so I'm not sure how much difference it makes. Description
below.
If you try it, be sure and STOP and restart the scheduler so it will pick up
the change to dsm.opt.
===
Or create a third management class, with an even longer retention than
notesclass.
-Original Message-
From: Short, Anne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: wrong stgpool
Sounds like the new management class, notesclass, has a
Services.
Each service runs under a logon id.
The default for most NT services is to use the SYSTEM id.
But sometimes services are set up with another id, espeically if the serivce
needs network or domain authority to access files. Go into Services, and
look at the PROPERTIES of each. You will
e we had been exluding the
ntuser.dat for one of our service accounts (NAV for Exchange). We did have
a full backup of everything else (including the registry). NAV did not
start, and the ntuser.dat files were missing from the profile directories.
When we copied the ntuser.dat from the origina
You must have a copy pool?
If you have a copy pool, when TSM runs AUDIT, it just marks the files as
damaged and doesn't delete them from the data base (that would invalidate
the copies in the copy pool as well.)
You need to repair the problem by running the RESTORE STGPOOL poolname.
The first t
You can't destroy dltpool without destroying any copies of the data that are
in your copypool.
Essentially, if you have a backup of a file in a primay pool, and you cause
the db entry for that file to be deleted, it also deletes the record of that
file that is in the copy pool.
However, you DON"T
I don't know why you are having the overall problem, but there is also a
problem in your specification.
Periods are treated just like any other character, not a wild card.
So when you specify:
INCLUDE DATA:\USERS\...\*.*
you are telling TSM to match filenames that have at least one . in the name
I've had about every combination you can think of -
two single disks, one copy on a RAID array and one copy on an internal
drive, etc.
It's just a matter of speed - whatever you can get from your hardware,
without (and this is critical) introducing a single point of failure.
My best performance ha
RMAN is the Oracle backup utility. You can set it up and use it without any
interaction with TSM. Think of it is a backup product that can back up to
local tape or disk.
When you add the TSM TDP, it just sort of makes TSM look like a funky tape
driver to RMAN. YOu still run your backups and re
I would not expect them to be the same. physical_mb (and I always get this
confused and have to look it up...) is the space occupied, including any
"dead" space inside aggregates. logical_mb is the space occupied, not
including any "dead space" inside aggregates.
When a file is expired, if it i
Eric,
Remember the discussion a few months ago about "orphan" backups?
The 2.2 version as a utility called TDPOSYNC:
>From the install guide:
"This utility checks for items on the TSM server that are not in the
RMAN catalog and allows you to repair such discrepancies. By thus
removing unwanted o
However, if you have high-capacity tape, you don't have to spend a whole
tape for each node. You can control the tape use by setting a MAXSCRATCH
value for the tape pool. For example, if you have 200 clients to back up
and you set MAXSCRATCH to 100, TSM will put two clients on each tape. You
ge
user from reading the file but
that user can still backup, copy, delete the file etc, as long as they have
rights.
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-----
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win2k
If the file is from a Wintel machine, then ll_name should be specified
"SOMETHING.BLAH", because the file names are in all upper case.
If it is from a unix-flavored machine, then use mixed case.
Signed,
Been there, Been burned.
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Dwight E [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes. A good DB backup volume is usable even if it is no longer in the
VOLHISTORY file.
You just have to specify the volser on your DSMSERV RESTORE DB command.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Milliren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
If the log utilization gets to 100%, it will not only shut down sessions, it
will crash the server.
-Original Message-
From: Suad Musovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 2:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recovery log utilization does not drop after DB b
We run TSM on AIX 4.3.3; we don't reboot unless there is a problem, or we
have software maintenance to apply, or some other reason. Not uncommon for
us to run 2-3 weeks without a restart.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:5
TSM 3.7.4 on AIX 4.3.3
I have EXPIRE INVENTORY scheduled to run for 1.5 hours in the wee hours:
EXPIRE INVENTORY QUIET=YES DURATION=90
Sometimes EXPIRE INVENTORY runs OK.
Other times it starts up, examines/expires 200-300 objects, then shuts
itself down again in 2-3 minutes with the normal mess
hat we can run the next phase of our daily chores). This has been going
on for almost a year.
--
Phillip Ford
Senior Software Specialist
Corporate Computer Center
Schering-Plough Corp.
(901) 320-4462
(901) 320-4856 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-----
From: Prather, Wanda [mai
-
From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: EXPIRE INVENTORY shuts down
TSM 3.7.4 on AIX 4.3.3
I have EXPIRE INVENTORY scheduled to run for 1.5 hours in the wee hours:
EXPIRE INVENTORY QUIET=YES DURATION=90
Sometimes EXPIRE
The next week expire starts at 5 am but usually finishes around
noon.
Hope this helps,
--
--
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/30/01
at 05:11 PM, "Prather, Wanda" <
I have done restores on NT5 from a similar config, and had NO problems.
I agree that autonegotiate is a likely culprit when the throughput is that
slow. When autonegotiate is the problem, our network guys can see errors
being recorded on the switch; ask for help there.
Another possibility is th
There is a presentation on the Tivoli website comparing 3590, 9840, LTO, and
DLT.
http://www.tivoli.com/news/press/analyst/tsm.pdf
I agree with Jeff & Dwight;
if you are used to 3590, consider that LTO is a competitor to DLT, not a
competitor to the 3590.
I would base the decision on load:
If y
select node_name as "Nodes with no filespaces:", -
date(reg_time) as "Registered:", -
date(lastacc_time) as "Last Access:" -
from nodes where node_name not in -
(select node_name from filespaces)
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Oak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31,
I have run into some ugly issues with the Win2K backup of the "SYSTEM
OBJECT".
I'm throwing the information out here to warn other people what to expect,
and hopefully to get the developers to reconsider the current
implementation.
The SYSTEM FILES component of the "SYSTEM OBJECT" on Win2K cons
them to be picked up on your incremental. Any sense of what that might
be?
Hope they look at this quickly as our local Windoze shop is talking about
converting their NT4 environment into Win2K Thanks -
George Lesho
System/Storage Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL
ous
problem that you should not have to "work around". Hope it gets fixed
before we go to Win2K next year...
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Laboratories
"Prather, Wanda"
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is why we do a makesisbee tape and exclude the root
volume groups when backing up our AIX boxes...
George Lesho
System/Storage Admin
AFC Enterprises
"Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/01/2001 03:46:01 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL
This is probably more a question about the win2k system than about
tsm.
--
------
Bill Colwell
C. S. Draper Lab
Cambridge, Ma.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/01/01
at 04:56 PM, "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 2219 matches
Mail list logo
