On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 02:02:02PM +0700, nghiatd wrote:
> a.. 9 tapes have 'Access=Read-Only', 'Number of Write Errors: 1'
> b.. 1 tape has 'Access=Unavailable', 'Number of Write Errors: 1
Perhaps that batch of LTO2 tapes was bad, but it's more likely that one
of your drives has problems. Ch
Read/Write errors happens to all tape technologies, in my experience less
frequently on LTO than many others. If you experience a lot of errors on your
tapes, fist make sure that you clean your tape drives frequently, then see if
you can relate the errors to any specific tape drive. If you can,
Hi all
I have just had a call from our off-site copypool storage location to say
that they have mistakenly popped one of my tape into their library and
somehow initialised it (don't ask, I'm pretty cross at the moment).
Anyway, I understand that the data on this missing volume can be
transferred
I also have used SDLT tapes for 2 year and they are still well,
LTO tapes just were bought four month ago. I will check again to see whether
drive is error.
>The capacity of your tapes are related to your compression-rate. Since all
data is not the same, you'll see different rates for >different k
Hi LUC,
There is a select statememnt posted on the TsmWiki,
http://tsmwiki.com/tsmwiki/SelectStatements/AreCopypoolsUpToDate
This will show you numfiles and logical occupancy per node per storage
pool. This lets you see which primary/copy storage pools are out of
sync, and which nodes are affect
I think you will be able to do a delete volume discarddata=yes, then the
data will be recreated next time the primary pool is backed up to the
copypool.
Matthew Warren.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tsmwiki.com/tsmwiki/MatthewWarren
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
Hello,
We just updated to TSM Server 5312 on W2K and the server crashes every
moment. He starts only with NOMIGRRECL, but even then keeps on
crashing. ( ADSM exception file=pkthread.c line=2256, and buffer
overrun detected while freeing memory
called from afcreate.c(3907).
IBM analyzed dump and
On Jul 5, 2005, at 7:20 AM, Matthias Feyerabend wrote:
Hello,
We just updated to TSM Server 5312 on W2K and the server crashes every
moment. He starts only with NOMIGRRECL, but even then keeps on
crashing. ( ADSM exception file=pkthread.c line=2256, and buffer
overrun detected while freeing me
I would be interested in that, if you'd care to keep posting updates.
Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/4/2005 4:03:41 PM >>>
Hello All,
Just to keep you updated on my quest :)
I began to modify some settings, a
Hi TSM'ers,
I have a process that looks like this;
1,949 Backup Storage Pool Primary Pool RMM_STD_DATA_PRIM_LTO2,
Copy Pool
RMM_STD_DATA_COPY_LTO2, Files
Backed Up: 2881,
Bytes Backed Up: 327,851,654,004,
Unrea
Include both lto1 and lto2 in the same tape pool showing the same
capacity. The lto1's will still write at their capacity. In
transitioning to lto2 just manually mark the lto1's read only and later
destroyed. This will allow you to eventually be all lto2's if that is
what you wish to transition to.
Hello,
I have created this script to create a request listing of tapes to be
returned from our vault when they are empty. As you can see from the
select statement that I run daily it will have duplicates within it since I
have a delay of 5 days. Is there a certain way I can manipulate this
scrip
On Jul 5, 2005, at 9:14 AM, Warren, Matthew (Retail) wrote:
...I have never seen a process that reports it succesfully has an
input and
output volume not actually doing any work. ...
Oh, thou hast not experienced the full breadth of yon world... :-)
This is usually the case where software is
hi ,
my name is shaban ,I'm facing problem when i run tdpocon,exe password,
get this error
"ANS1087e (RC106) access to the specified file or directory is denid"
so i can not continue on configure oracle backup . os is windows 2003
and oracle is 9.2
please any help.
best ragards,
shaban
-
Is there a mirror of the ADSM.QuickFacts? BU.edu is not accessible to me due
to a problem that is not at my end.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Bremer
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 11:57 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM
Hello Everyone!
I think I had this issue before, but I can't seem to find the solution to
it. Any suggestions as to why this will not work? I am trying to get that
listing pinpointed to reporting each tape on the first day that it becomes
"pending" and it just doesn't see to like my syntax. Tha
I had looked into the problem variously, and came up with nothing. No
panel errors, nothing in the AIX errpt, actlog, drive light nice and
green. I had overlooked tapeutil though.
It is not unusual to find TSM in this state, or variations of; and
restarting dsmserv is the only way of clearing 'stu
There is the tsmwiki, built from the QuickFacts, at
http://tsmwiki.com/tsmwiki/
And within the quickfacts, it mentions it is 'referenced by' the
following. Whether 'referenced' is linked to, indexed, or a copy of, I'm
not sure.
http://dir.adsm.org/FAQ/
http://dir.adsm.org/Cool/
http://www.co
Joni,
Try something like : where days(current_timestamp)-days(pending_date) =1
This should work !
Cheers.
Arnaud
**
Panalpina Management Ltd., Basle, Switzerland, CIT Department
Viadukstrasse 42, P.O. Box 4002 Basel
Repost with correct subject-line for conversation-thread
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Warren, Matthew (Retail)
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:17 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: The end of the TSM FAQ list as we know
I think the problem is that you are mixing "date" data with "timestamp"
data (the latter includes date and time). Try changing this:
... and date(pending_date) < (current_timestamp - 1 day) and ...
to this:
... and date(pending_date) < (date(current_timestamp) - 1 day) and ...
Regards,
Andy
A
Playing with this, & my SQL knowledge not being so good I have a
question. Why does this;
pending_date < current_timestamp - 1 day
return the same as this
pending_date < (current_timestamp - 1 day)
But they both return different from this
Date(pending_date) < date(current_timestamp - 1 day)
I
This will also work,
date(pending_date) < date(current_timestamp - 1 day)
Computer says 'No'..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 4:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: incompatible operator
Hi,
I'm not sure I follow what your after, but you may be able to alter this
script to get the desired effect,
http://www.tsmwiki.com/tsmwiki/SelectStatements/ReclaimableByDays
That script runs several queries to show how many volumes went pending
by stgpool by day. Adding in the extra clauses
I am not sure if this is exactly what you are looking for but this
select statement gives you the number of files and the amount of data in
each pool. Then you can compare the totals of your primary pools vs.
your copy pools.
select stgpool_name as "Storage Pool",sum(num_files) as "Number of Fil
Hi Everybody,
Does anyone have any thoughts on saving on the number of tapes TSM uses ? After
auditing our backups and finding that the backups are "clean" i.e backing up
only what is needed, and the correct number of versioning is being applied to
files, and reclamation is used, if there is a
On 7/5/05, Richard Mochnaczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on saving on the number of tapes TSM uses ?
> After auditing our backups and finding that the backups are "clean" i.e
> backing up only what is needed, and the correct number of versioni
27 matches
Mail list logo
