Hi TSM'ers,
trying to install a downloaded TSMSACAIX5310.tar.gz failed with
missing requisites for the baslevel-filesets. i.e.
...
SELECTED FILESETS: The following is a list of filesets that you asked
to
install. They cannot be installed until all of their requisite filesets
are also in
Hallo *SMers
We are trying to determine what parameter controls the amount of time a
LANFree backup will wait for mountpoints to become available before
bailing out.
So far we have looked at setting RESOURCETimeout on the StorageAgent and
the TSM server, and the MOUNTWait parameter, with no
Ok, a medium sized
Doh!
Is needed
___ Disclaimer Notice __
This message and any attachments are confidential and should only be read by
those to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact us, delete the
Hallo TSM'ers
I have come to install the storage agent on HPUX, but the files
downloaded from index.storsys.ibm.com all end with the sffix
.img
and the install docs refer to using swinstall -s /cdrom
now, obviously the .img is an image of a cdrom
Does anyone know how I can install from the
On Oct 5, 2004, at 3:42 AM, Rainer Holzinger wrote:
I have installed and customized ITSM backup/archive client
5.2.3.1 and
Storage Agent 5.2.3.2 on HPUX 11.11. The ITSM server is at 5.2.3.1
on AIX
5.2-ML03.
If I'm going to start the Storage Agent, the process will disappear
after a
while. W
Hi all,
I have installed and customized ITSM backup/archive client 5.2.3.1 and
Storage Agent 5.2.3.2 on HPUX 11.11. The ITSM server is at 5.2.3.1 on AIX
5.2-ML03.
If I'm going to start the Storage Agent, the process will disappear after a
while. Within the ITSM client error log
Hello all,
I am attempting to setup a storage agent on Solaris.
To ensure I am defining the paths correctly, I need to identify which /dev/rmt/0st
etc.. device file on the solaris machine is pointed at which tape drive by WWN. In the
past I have been handed this info by a unix admin, this time
was to fix the problem in the product code. This situation
will no longer be a problem in a future release.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 19 januari 2004 19:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Does change in copygroup destination require StorageAg
januari 2004 19:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Does change in copygroup destination require StorageAgent
restart?
We ran into a situation over the weekend that I have not seen mentioned
before, and I was hoping that someone might be able to shed some light on
what occurred.
TSM server has a 3583
DB servers
(cold DB backups, using just the backup-archive client and
StorageAgent). During that time, all backups have been to two LTO-1 drives.
Last week, four LTO-2 drives were added to the library, and the library was
partitioned so that the two original drives are in one library (libr 3583
Hi All
This is my first attempt at getting LAN free backups working from a win2k
client to a win2k server.
Client is 5.1.5.0 and server is 5.1.5.4
ibm 3584 lto library with 5 drives
everything SAN attached
this is the actlog error i am getting when i try and start the storageagent
on the win2k
as well
Unixgeekus
Rejean Larivee
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COM> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server /
storageagent perf
; 1-800-PAGE-MCI#1376812
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Burton, Robert [mailto:robert.burton@;RBC.COM]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
>
> no we are still using 3
,
-
Rejean Larivee
IBM TSM/ADSM Level 2 Support
David E Ehresman
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server /
storageagent perfor
5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
no we are still using 32 bit
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01@;LOUISVILLE.EDU]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
no we are still using 32 bit
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:deehre01@;LOUISVILLE.EDU]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM 5116 server / storageagent performance degradation
Did you go to 64 bit mode when you went to 5.1.1.6
Did you go to 64 bit mode when you went to 5.1.1.6? We have some
clients that start out backing up at a good rate and then shift into a
mode where they are running very very slow. We now think this might be
a 64 bit mode server problem.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/15/02 09:20AM >>>
We were r
We were running tsm 4.2.2.4 on an S7A AIX server. We were putting through
approx 1.7 TB nightly with approx 85%
going to disk storagepool and the remaining going direct to tape. We were
also testing Lan-free with Gresham EDT-Distributape and STK acsls/9840 tape
drives and we were consistently on
18 matches
Mail list logo
