Thanks for the input Andy,
I am facing one problem with teh select commadn - in fact it i sproducing a
file which is too huge. I know which HL_name is responsible for that
numerous records & want to exclude it from the select command:
Th command I am using is as follows:
select * from archives w
Hi Everybody!
Pls help me
Nguyen Duc Thanh
FPT Software Solution-Government Business Unit
Address: 3th Fl, 51th, Ledaihanh.str, Haibatrung.dst, Hanoi, Vietnam
Tel: (84-4) 974-5451/974-5476, ext 304
Fax: (84-4) 974
Sorry, yes I did not provide enough information.
I think I figured it out (egg on my face).
I should have done a
'UPDATE VOL * WHERESTG=COPYPOOL ACCESS=READO'
first.
Thanks to all for your assistance.
Hi Folks,
I just installed ADSM 3.1.0.8 client on an HP_UX 10.20 server. Everything is
working fine, except the GUI on the client. When I started up the backup
session using the gui, the screen expanded rapidly and uncontrollably towards
both sides of the screen.
Did anyone ever run into problem
Oh my, seems like I started a holy war (again) :)
Anyway, thanks for the answers, now I see clear ! I started using TSM with
Version 4.1.x, so I didn't know there once was a "real" GUI for *SM.
Nevertheless, I would REALLY like such a tool cause I don't like the web gui
either.
Greetings,
Sasch
Usually caused by downlevel TSANDS and/or TSA600 NLM's.
Get the latest of these from SUPPORT.NOVELL.COM !
Bill Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/22/2003 01:38 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM 5.1.6.6 Netware client
Netware 6.0
TSM Server 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3
TSA600.NLM 6.00.05
SMDR.NLM 6.50.03
Running the daily incremental, I see lots of messages in the DSMERROR.LOG
file:
(TSA600.NLM 6.0 269) No data sets can be found
and then the associated
ANS4005E Error processing "filename":
1. IT DEPENDS. (You KNEW I was going to say that, didn't you?!?)
2. There is no "right" answer (so you will probably be getting LOTS of
opinions back about this question ;>).
3. If you only have a few clients to back up, it just doesn't matter.
4. The purpose of your disk pool is to act as
What might be another alternative is an MMC (Microsoft Management
Console)
Bruce Kamp
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/22/2003 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: *Real* admin interface (Was: q vol f=g ??!?)
>this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web int
Having been part of three original joint studies with ESMS (which never saw
the light of day), WDSF (which morphed into ADSM) and finally another ADSM
project back in the late '80s and early '90s, I only had access to the line
mode admin client in the early days and I still use it to this day. Rea
I have seen this on my laptop when going from site to site (different TSM
servers) and forgetting to update my options file. If I can't connect to
the TSM server because I have the wrong tcpaddress still left in my options
file, sometimes I see the scheduler sitting in a starting state.
Make sure
There is a nice article on the history of TSM (WDSF/ADSM/TSM) in the July
2003 copy of Computer Technology Review (wwpi.com), written by IBM
Distinguished Engineer, Mike Kaczmarski. This is a good marketing article,
w/allot of truth in it!
The July 2003 issue is not on their web site yet (the June
Me, me! I still use the 3.1.0.8 Admin GUI - the ability to sort output,
then manipulate it, is incredibly valuable to me.
Nick Cassimatis
Technical Team Lead
Enterprise Storage Services - IBM Global Services South
877-462-6709 T/L 930-1720
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think twice, type once.
Start a another telnet session to the TSM server. Run 'dsmadmc -mountmode'
We had the same issue recently at a D.R. site that didn't have enough slots
for all the tapes.
Brenda
"Hart, Charles"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Bytes Sent" is the amount of data the TSM server sends to the client.
"Bytes Recvd" is the amount of data the client sends to the server.
During a regular incremental backup, the client needs information about
the active inventory for that client that is stored on the TSM server
(i.e. what files
>I searched the archives but couldn't find the answer I'm looking for,
>neither in the manuals.
>
>AIX 5.1, TSM-server 4.2.2.8
>W2K, TSM-client 5.1.5.0
>
>During an incremental back-up the following stats where displayed after
>giving a 'q sess'
...
>What is send to the server that the column 'Byte
Windows 2000
TSM Client 5.1.6.2 running managedservices webclient schedule
TSM Server 5.1.7.1 on AIX 4.3
I have a client running in MANAGEDSERVICES mode with the scheduler. The CAD
service is started and automatic, The associated scheduler service has been
running fine, then started missing the sc
Hello,
I searched the archives but couldn't find the answer I'm looking for,
neither in the manuals.
AIX 5.1, TSM-server 4.2.2.8
W2K, TSM-client 5.1.5.0
During an incremental back-up the following stats where displayed after
giving a 'q sess'
Sess Comm. Sess WaitBytes
Obviously not, they lost the $$$ types with the licensing shuffles and now
the techie types with the abysmal support site.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IBM is not eating their
Hi *SMers!
As many know I work for a company who made a 3rd part BMR software for TSM.
And I was certify TSM 5.2.0.2 for our software today. But I got some problem with our
software together with TSM 5.2.0.2.
And after some debuging was we found some missing information in the registry under
HKEY_
>this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface" subject=20
>pops up now and then.
>The poster of the first message always dreams of a Windows or Java GUI
>that supports the latest TSM server (btw I'm dreaming too).
>A few minutes later the list gets drowned by "me too" messages.
>
>
Lets be truthful, IT really stinks as a support tool.
Does anyone actually like the site? I doubt it. IBM, in their rush to control access
to the software has destroyed a great support site and replaced it with junk.
having to jump thru all of IBMs hoops and still not being able to find what I
>Is ftp.software.ibm.com an HA environment?
Probably not... I know from past experience in IBM facilities, at least,
that IBM designates all the current, good stuff for sale to customers:
what is relegated for use internally is generally stuff that won't sell
or is older technology - remaindered s
Thomas,
And if I recall correctly, at this point, the next poster usually says:
"But you *can* still use the old ADSMv3.1 admin GUI with current server
versions...". I know I do for lots of things such as tape/volume
manipulation and viewing filespace listings etc, and it does the job
more than
Hello,
this "the old admin GUI is much better than the Web interface" subject
pops up now and then.
The poster of the first message always dreams of a Windows or Java GUI
that supports the latest TSM server (btw I'm dreaming too).
A few minutes later the list gets drowned by "me too" messages.
I
I have to go along with this --
Is ftp.software.ibm.com an HA environment?
And as for the web support -- if IBM is going to continue using MS-Internet
Explorer as the preferred web browser, fine. If I have problems accessing
pages with Mozilla, IBM can either fix the pages or provide MS-IE 6.x fo
This is exactly why I made the recommendation earlier to read the manual.
I also encourage you to look up the message in the messages manual. You
can also use the "HELP" command from the Admin CLI, i.e. HELP ANR1437E, as
that may provide you with useful information.
Regards,
Andy
"If you give a
I still use it also and would be lost without it. It is much easier to look
at things. I hate the web one.
--
Phillip Ford
Senior Software Specialist
Corporate Computer Center
Schering-Plough Corp.
(901) 320-4462
(901) 320-4856 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E
>From the Admin CLI - refer to the QUERY MGMTCLASS command
>From the Client CLI - refer to the QUERY MGMTCLASS command
>From the GUI - refer to the Utilities/View Policy Information menu item
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Ra
Yes, it is awkward getting into the support sites for patches and info.
I got so many userid's and passwords, and each place thinks they are
important enough in my life to remembers thiers!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/21/03 05:44PM >>>
I am not asking for advice or help but want to discuss am I the o
Eric, following some unmount failures, IBM recommended to install 36U3 (36U5
was chosen because it appeared on the IBM ftp site the day before).
Regards,
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Cen
Hi Christo!
Yep! I'm still using the 3.1.08 Admin GUI. I still like it a WHOLE LOT
better than that hideous web admin interface. I'm also experiencing that
same hang when clicking on the storagepool icon. I guess TSM returns some
data which the Admin GUI can't handle.
I submitted the requirement to
How about 'select class_name, defaultmc from mgmtclasses'
Raminder.
Lawrence Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/22/2003 09:03 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
default management class?
How do you determine which is the default
How do you determine which is the default management class?
Hi Sascha,
You have two (3) options when doing commands to TSM. Without the f=d, you
get
normal about, with it you get detailed info - (f=d). The 3rd option is
format=gui.
In the old days of ADSM there was a GUI that worked/works a whole lot better
than the WEB Gui. When this interface sends comma
Hi to all the *SMers out there !
I just stumbled over the output of "q vol f=g", actually is was a typo, I
got no error Message but an output:
-
Volume Name: FRE660L1
Storage Pool Name: LTOPOOL
Device Class Name: LTOCLASS
Estimated Capacity (MB): 130,177.5
Pct Util: 20.1
Volume Status
More details... ANR Message etc?
Restore needs more tapes than the DR library will hold, and as
soon as I start the restore, the restore fails.
-Original Message-
From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 7:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DRM - Can'
TSM 4.2.3.1 on Wintel, library 3583-L18 with 2 drives and 18 slots
Production is the same but library has 6 drives and 60 slots
Problem:
Restore needs more tapes than the DR library will hold, and as
soon as I start the restore, the restore fails.
I have checked in some of the t
1) Could take a while depending on how you changed your retention for example if you
went from 180 active version of a file to 20 then TSM would have to potentially expire
60xeach changed file. In additional WIN2k is not know for very fast I/O, not to
mention if your tsm db is not layed out in
Hi Rene!
Thanks for your experiences! But did you find a way to determine what has
been added or fixed by this code? Or did you also apply this code just
because it's newer. (Not that there is something wrong with that, I will
also install it because it's newer :-)
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KL
Hi Eric, we just upgraded 2 of our 3584 libraries, no problem since 3 days:
- drives 36U5
- library 3300
greetings,
rené
-Original Message-
From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,22. August 2003 14:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New 3584 library and drive
Hi *SM-ers!
For all fellow 3584 owners: IBM published again new microcode for this
libarary and for it's drives.
And again, we are left in the dark about the changes/fixes...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
**
Enviro:
W2K TSM 5.1.6.3
I have been doing an "expire inventory" for some 14 hours now after
changing the MC (# in retain extra versions) which is causing rebinding.
Number of nodes to rebind:
Node Name Type FilespaceFSID Storage Number of Physical
Logical
Name
Hi list,
I am installing a TSM Server in a W2K machine with a DAT unit for testing and
demonstration purposes. The installation goes fine but the Device Driver does not
recognize the DAT unit (SONY SDT 4000E) and gives me the above error.
The DAT unit Windows driver is not installed and the Win
but to get past this little quirk...
OK, you sould be able to start TSM as if it were a totally new
environment...
do that and since your device class you used to backup the db was a "file",
redefine that ~file_device_class~ in your bare/fresh tsm, halt tsm, and
then perform your recovery again.
Sh
Eric,
Hmn - looks like you'll need to add some entries into the dsmserv.opt
file on your TSM server. This is the TSM Server options file, and the
TSM server process re-reads this every time you start it up. The entries
you need might in the simplest form look like this:
VOLHIST volhist.out
DEVCON
Definately read the manual as explained by Andy already!
Cheers
Christo
> Hello , All
>
> For now , I can backup the TSM database sucessfully , however , I can not
do a sucessful database recover ,
> and the following is the command result . please see it
>
> Backup Database sucessfully===
Oscar,
The following is the output while I execute the 'backup devconfig' command .
would uyou please give me more advice for the following error .
Thank you .
==output of the 'backup devconfig' command ==
tsm: TSM>backup devconfig
ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: BACKUP DEVCONFIG
D
Hi Eric,
did you make a devconfig and volhist backup after the DB backup and before the DB
restore?
- backup devconfig
- backup volhist
If you didn't, startup TSM (if you still can !!) and make those backups. Then the
restore will succeed.
succes, Oscar
-Original Message-
From: Tec
There is Linux RedHat 6.2/7.3
Nguyen Duc Thanh
FPT Software Solution-Government Business Unit
Address: 3th Fl, 51th, Ledaihanh.str, Haibatrung.dst, Hanoi, Vietnam
Tel: (84-4) 974-5451/974-5476, ext 304
Fax: (84-4)
Hello , All
For now , I can backup the TSM database sucessfully , however , I can not do a
sucessful database recover ,
and the following is the command result . please see it
Backup Database sucessfully===
tsm: TSM>backup db type=full devclass=file_device_class
ANR2017I Administrator AD
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Le Minh Hieu wrote:
> Hi everybody !
> We know that TSM 5.1.5 only support TDP for Oracle on Linux Advanced Server 2.1. But
> did anyone test TDP for Oracle on Linux 6.2 or 7.3 ?
as remember correctly, some time ago we were deploying backup management and we had to
deploy ts
52 matches
Mail list logo
