Re: TSM/ODBC connection not working...

2002-04-18 Thread Seay, Paul
When it comes to Windows, you make sure you can recover before you install anything. -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM/ODBC connection not working... Paul, is that just genera

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Mahesh Prasad
Hello, I don't see that you would have any problem with unload and load db. However, if you want to be more secure then backup you database before starting unload and load exercise. In case, you get into some trouble then you can restore you database. Regards, Mahesh Prasad DCM Data Systems Lim

Re: TSM/ODBC connection not working...

2002-04-18 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Paul, is that just general precaution you exercise with any new software, or has the ODBC driver actually taken down your system before? I have never heard of such a problem (I've seen the application crash as you described earlier, but not an entire system; and I am not aware of any "crash" defec

Re: TSM/ODBC connection not working...

2002-04-18 Thread Seay, Paul
I will give this a try when I get brave enough to trust it will no kill my system. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM/ODBC connection not working... Hi Paul, Try the 5.

TDP for Exchange RC=425 on Information Store

2002-04-18 Thread Seay, Paul
Has anyone else seen this and solved it? ANE4993E (Session: 9538, Node: NNSE8_XCH) TDP MSExchgV2 NT ACN3502 TDP for Microsoft Exchange: full backup of Information Store from server NNSE8 failed, rc = 425. The biggest problem is the thing gives a good return code when it happens. Now it happen

V3.1 clients on V4.2 server OK?

2002-04-18 Thread Roger Deschner
We are about to (finally) upgrade our server to 4.2, but we have a lot of V3.1 clients. Will they continue to work? I sure hope so, because I'd like to follow the recommendation in the TSM manuals which is to upgrade the server first, and then the clients, however I've heard rumors of problems in

Re: Daily Backup Report

2002-04-18 Thread Dennis Glover
Here's how we do it: At the dsmadmc prompt: def scr daily_report desc="Create a daily backup report" line=1 upd scr daily_report cmd="q sch * * begind=-$1 begint=now endd=-$2 endt=now" line=2 DON'T omit the negative sign preceding the $1 and $2! (Sorry if I blew the syntax a little bit on line

Re: Offsite Mirror of TSM server

2002-04-18 Thread Mike Crawford
Could you not start a second instance of the server on the target server, restore the db from the source server into this second instance? Then the server-to-server would still operate, but it would be within the one machine! In theory, of course... M. >This is such a key point when conside

Re: sense errors

2002-04-18 Thread Anthony Wong
Try get a brand new Sony tape, Label the tape first using TSM Web admin or dsmlabel then check it into the library. Use that brand new Tape to do TSM operation. Is your SpectraLogic HVD 64000 drive has latest firmware please check http://www.spectralogic.com/support/firmware_12k_64k.cfm How abou

Re: TSM on SUN

2002-04-18 Thread bbullock
Hey, careful, some of us love the IBM LVM and find Veritas cumbersome and overly confusing. :-) While we are on the subject, we recently brought up our first TSM server on Solaris (our other 10 are on AIX) and had a question as to the disk setup. VxFs and VxVm are available to be

Re: Offsite Mirror of TSM server

2002-04-18 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
This is such a key point when considering server-to-server! The short answer to this question does not begin to actually tell the story. Kelly J. Lipp Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc. PO Box 51313 Colorado Springs, CO 80949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.storsol.com or www.storser

Re: TSM on SUN

2002-04-18 Thread Kelly J. Lipp
Our experience with TSM on Solaris has been very good. Installation is very easy, upgrades are very easy and the code has good support from IBM/Tivoli. And the added benefit of not having to learn the iLogical Volume Manager! If your customer has a large Solaris site already, let them use TSM on

system params for Solaris on TSM upgrade to 4.1.2.0

2002-04-18 Thread Jolliff, Dale
I'm getting kernel panics on reboot after upgrading to 4.2.1.0 on Solaris. Once we remove the changes that the README says are required to /etc/system the machine runs ok... Anyone seen this before? Here's the message from the admin: Here's the section of my '/etc/system' file that appears

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread David Longo
I would just use the REDUCE DB as mentioned by some earlier. I've used it before to move things around. It's fairly quick, can be done with server running and doesn't require unload/load and space to do it. David Longo >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/18/02 10:27AM >>> Hi, I achieved to define my ext

Domino setup/backup error

2002-04-18 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
The Domino guys set up a command for TSM to run every 6 hours. The schedule calls the command but returns the below errors. Anyone familiar with Domino that can help? The error code points to an environment setup problem, not sure what the return code means though. I'm guessing at this point the e

sense errors

2002-04-18 Thread Johnn D. Tan
Does anyone have any ideas on the following errors that showed up in our TSM activity log? We have TSM 4.1.3 server running on AIX 4.3.3ML9, connected to a SpectraLogic HVD 64000/Gator (with Sony SDX-500C drives). We've sent the sense code info to Tivoli as well as SpectraLogic, but they point at

Re: Deleting data after an archive

2002-04-18 Thread Malbrough, Demetrius
You can run the archive with the -deletefiles command! e.g. dsmc archive "/home/*" -deletefiles Regards, Demetrius -Original Message- From: Jason Schram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Deleting data after an archive Hi,

Re: IP over FC on AIX

2002-04-18 Thread Lloyd Dieter
Umm...re: the attached...that depends on the switch. The FC/9000 (IBM2042) and (I believe) the Brocades (2109's) will pass IP over fibre. Not sure about the McData's. -Lloyd On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:24:13 +0200 Daniel Sparrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > Sending IP traffic over your SAN

Deleting data after an archive

2002-04-18 Thread Jason Schram
Hi, This should be an easy one for you gurus! Does anyone know how to delete files out of a directory after the archive command has run? Thank you in advance

Re: DB & Recovery Log Copies

2002-04-18 Thread Cook, Dwight E
check to see if they are protecting the DB & LOG files via OS level mirroring or maybe via some other form of RAID configuration... In our environment using plain SSA disks in a JBOD configuration I mirror (via tsm) the db & log files but in our environments using our ESS storage unit I don't...

Re: Offsite Mirror of TSM server

2002-04-18 Thread Prather, Wanda
I did not intend to imply you can't restore the DB from the target server. What I meant is that you cannot restore client files from the target server. You have to get the source server up and running again. It's really no different from any other DR situation. If you lose your primary TSM serve

Re: Offsite Mirror of TSM server

2002-04-18 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
That is what I guessed from the docs. I was hoping I was wrong ! So, of what value would a DB backup to a "target" server be ? I could never recover from it !!! Sounds like a partially implemented and of very limited use feature, to me !! Is anybody out there using a "target" server to perform

DB & Recovery Log Copies

2002-04-18 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello! I have a test and a production system that were previously managed by two different groups. The test system has the DB and Recovery Log Volumes with copies of the volumes, but on production there are none. I have 18 volumes for the DB and only 1 volume for the recovery log. I was under t

Re: Database Unload

2002-04-18 Thread William F. Colwell
Jeff, I unload some of the tsm tables daily and then load them into db2. The method will depend on your server platform and the target dbms. My server is on OS/390 and the target is db2. Briefly the process is a batch job that does 'select * from nodes' with the output going to a file. the fil

Re: Residency Announcement: TI-A212 Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management

2002-04-18 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Dear Mrs. Brooks, can you proof the URL sent is accesible from outside network 9.x.x.x (IBM Intranet)? AFAIK all w3.*.ibm.com are internal and we being outside IBM are not even able to resolve those name (for security reasons). Residencies do have external addresses and I was able to access them.

Re: Residency Announcement: TI-A212 Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management - corrected URL

2002-04-18 Thread Charlotte Brooks
Zlatko is quite correct - the externally accessible URL for this residency announcement is: http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/residents.nsf/c0d5c6f1588c774985256ad1005da419/a8deda655431d1ec85256b9e000de509?OpenDocument Alternatively, go to the Redbooks home page http://ibm.com/redbooks, click on "R

Re: Offsite Mirror of TSM server

2002-04-18 Thread Prather, Wanda
My understanding is that when you use source/target server, you think of the "target" TSM server as just an electronic vault. It is NOT the same as having a backup TSM server. As you said, the objects in the target server's data base are archive objects. The metadata needed to restore the data

Re: Residency Announcement: TI-A212 Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management

2002-04-18 Thread Anthony Wong
(See attached file: Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management.htm) Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 04/18/2002 10:29:38 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:[

Re: online image backup

2002-04-18 Thread Andrew Raibeck
This feature is not available without the 5.1 server, which is why you don't see it available from the GUI. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only

Sorry: Re: New Tivoli licensing - what "processor" mean (RESOLVED)

2002-04-18 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Ooops, I've pressed the send button too fast. --> Old Value-Based Pricing (VBP) scheme was distinguishing only the *servers* but not clients. I was not correct. Both are counting both side processors. VBP scheme used three "tiers", actually ranges based on number of processors. EVBP scheme count

TSM on SUN

2002-04-18 Thread Pétur Eyþórsson
Hi guys A big company here in Iceland is thinking about installing TSM on SUN, they will be the first one to have TSM on SUN here. My question is, Is there anything I should know about (bugs, problems) anything sun related that is different from the other systems. Or should I recommend just us

Re: online image backup

2002-04-18 Thread Anthony Wong
Logical Volume Snapshot Agent requires TSM 5.1.0 server Tested able to take snap shot of partitions in Fiber Channel Harddisk or current boot up partitions in local system. Limitation of LVSA : TSM not able to backup current system boot up partition. TSM not able to backup partition where T

V3.1 ADSM Database Read error

2002-04-18 Thread Ward, Stuart
Hi *SMers Having recently taken over an ADSM 3.1 implementation, I come across the following error when backing up the database. This is the first error I've seen in the DB since being here. I have one mirrored copy. Is this something I should be overly concerned with - for instance if the oth

Re: Residency Announcement: TI-A212 Disaster Recovery Strategies with Tivoli Storage Management

2002-04-18 Thread Charlotte Brooks
This will be a very interesting project,producing a redbook covering a wide spectrum of DR-related activities. I encourage any interested parties to apply. More details of the residency are at http://w3.itso.ibm.com/itsoapps/residents.nsf/c0d5c6f1588c774985256ad1005da419/a8deda655431d1ec85256b9e0

Enlogix 36689

2002-04-18 Thread Jim Taylor
04/18/02 09:45:38 ANR0984I Process 334 for CLEANUP ARCHDIR SHOWSTATS started in the BACKGROUND at 09:45:38. 04/18/02 09:45:38 ANR0838I CLEANUP ARCHDIR SHOWSTATS: Archive directory cleanup job 1 started as background process 334. 04/18/02 09:45:39

online image backup

2002-04-18 Thread John Bremer
Hi all, Just experimenting with this new 5.1 feature, using the Logical Volume Snapshot Agent (LVSA). First, when configuring the LVSA Configuration Wizard, I am not presented with the appropriate panels to configure this feature. The Wizard goes from the "Install" choice panel, directly to "Fi

Re: IP over FC on AIX

2002-04-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Sending IP traffic over your SAN will at least make your SAN switches confused, as I believe that they do not talk IP, only SCSI commands. I have installed two Emulex LP8000 adapters in an IBM P-Series 640. You cannot use the IBM drivers for the Emulex card, as there are no drivers for the

TDP Oracle on AIX 5.1

2002-04-18 Thread Neil Rasmussen
Luis, What version of AIX 5 are you after, AIX 5 32bit? Tivoli has GAed TDP for Oracle 2.2.1 (aka 5.1.0) that supports AIX 5 32bit and has been available on the ftp site for some weeks now. If you do not qualify for FTP TDP for Oracle please see your rep. for the GAed version. AIX 5 64bit support

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
Hi, I achieved to define my external 8mm tape drive as a drive and manual library. Now the point is: How risky is unloading the db and loading again? Does anybody have experience about troubles I may have? Best Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [E

Re: IP over FC on AIX

2002-04-18 Thread Lloyd Dieter
>From what I recall, the FC6228 cards do NOT support IP over FC. The Emulex LP8000 cards/drivers, however, indicate that they do support this, but not concurrently with the FC/SCSI...it's one or the other, and if you load both drivers, whichever one gets bound to the card first wins. I have not

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Pope, Simon R.
Burak You can use your 3583 by redefining it as a manual library. Edit the devconfig file and redefine the library as manual - you will also need to delete all the drive definitions except for one. Then use tapeutil to move the db tapes between the IO slots and the drive. eg: DEFINE LIBRARY LIB_

Re: tsm database problem (unload)

2002-04-18 Thread Cook, Dwight E
Do you have some spare disk space ? ? ? You may set up a device class of a flat file and use that to unload and load from. I use extra space anywhere I can find it for such things... on one server I use extra space in the log file system DEFINE DEVCLASS DISKFILE DEVTYPE=FILE MAXCAPACITY=1048576K M

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
Hi, The TSM documentation says that I can do unloaddb with only a manual library. How can i do it with a 3583 LTO library? Is it possible to use my external 8mm tape drive? Thank you very much to all Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTE

EXPORT NODE hung and doesnt want to cancel

2002-04-18 Thread Thomas, Matthew
Help! I'm desperately trying to move a DB2 node from a TSM 4.1.0.0 server on WinNT4 but seem to be getting nowhere fast. Client and server are physically on the same hardware. The export is reading from and writing to 3590 carts in a 3494 library. The export was running for 40 hours Process Proc

tsm 4.2.2.0 help menu

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
Hi, A few minutes ago I noticed the buggy help system. When I enter something like "help q vol" It prints the help like garbage. Have you noticed it also? Regards, Burak

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi You don't have to use a manual library, a 3583 library will work. Best Regards Daniel Sparrman --- Daniel Sparrman Exist i Stockholm AB Propellervägen 6B 183 62 HÄGERNÄS Växel: 08 - 754 98 00 Mobil: 070 - 399 27 51 Burak Demircan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent b

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Kolbeinn Josepsson
In your case the assigned db space is equal to te available space, therefore you need to reduce the db before you delete the db volume. For example, if you are going to delete 200MB db volume: reduce db 200 del dbvol "full path and volume name" Best regards, Kolbeinn Josepsson NYHERJI HF. B

Re: problem after upgrding ADSM to TSM 4.2

2002-04-18 Thread William Rosette
Do not forget the atldd.driver file also, it needs to be up-to-date for the newer TSM versions 4.2+ Bernie M cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: problem after upgrding ADSM to TSM 4.2 "ADSM: Dis

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
But I can reduce it only 60 MBs although it is only 23 percent used? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 18.04.2002 15:26 Please respond to ADSM-L                 To:      

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Mahesh Prasad
Burak, In that case, you have to unload the database and then reload it using dsmserv unloaddb and dsmserv loaddb commands. So that your database is reorganized and takes minimum space to distribute itself. I hope, after doing unload and load database you will enough database space to reduce and

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
I have 1 x 500mb,2 x 200MB and 2x100MB and 1x 96MB db volumes but I can not reduce even a 96MB dbvol Is it logical? It think the database seems to be used more that it shows me? Regards, Burak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Before deleting a DB volume, you have to reduce the size of you're database, to free up volumes. According to you, all volumes are 100/200MB large. However, looking at the printout from your q db f=d, it seems like you have larger volumes, as the maximum reduction is only 60MB, but you h

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Seay, Paul
It is worse than this Daniel. Multiplexed is where many servers are on one tape. It basically single threads the restores. They do have a feature like TSM for SAP that uses multiple tape drives to span the data across. There TSM and NetBackup are pretty equal, when it works. The big deal wi

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Cook, Dwight E
The way the data is spread out on the volumes, you will probably have to do an "unload" and a "load" to reorg the data base prior to being able to delete some of your volumes... Dwight E. Cook Software Application Engineer III Science Applications International Corporation 509 S. Boston Ave. Sui

tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Burak Demircan
Hi, One of my TSM servers is TSM 4.2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3 I have a 1.4GB database which is % 24 full as follows. --- tsm: ADSM01.MBT>q db Available Assigned   Maximum   Maximum    Page     Total      Used  

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Richard L. Rhodes
Legato will pack fulls and incrementals into the same tapes, or, separate tapes, depending upon how you set up storage pools. I'd say the waste of tape comes from having to perform periodic full/differential backups, depending upon your schedule. If you mix multiple retention periods on the same

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Mahesh Prasad
Burak, You have assigned all the database space available to the TSM Server. You have to reduce the database size at least up to the size of the volume you want to delete. When you use Delete dbvolume command the data already existing in that volume then automatically get moved to the other volu

Re: tsm database problem

2002-04-18 Thread Niklas Lundstrom
Hello Your database needs to be reorganized, Your maximum reduction is only 60 Mb. Do a unloaddb and loaddb and after that delete the volumes Regards Niklas -Original Message- From: Burak Demircan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 18 april 2002 13:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: SAN Problem - TDP for SAP on Windows 2000

2002-04-18 Thread Christo Heuer
Hi Gerrit/Paul, Here is an extract from the readme.txt that comes with the QLOGIC drivers for NT: 2. Select HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and follow the tree structure down to the QLogic driver as follows: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE SYSTEM CurrentControlSet

Re: Daily Backup Report: More Issues

2002-04-18 Thread Christo Heuer
Hi Orin, Just to add to what Paul and Andy has already said: TDP for Exchange - definately a problem - even a q files nodexyz f=d reports a successfull backup - although the Rc425 in the exchange log says that the backup of storage group xyz failed the TDP for exchange does NOT comunicate this fa

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Also, at least earlier, Legato used a sequential file to handle information about clients, tapes, files and so on... TSM uses a DB/2 database, which is much more efficent than using a sequential file. Also, when having larger environments, the sequential file becomes a bottleneck, which ca

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Daniel Sparrman
Hi Using incrementals on Veritas Netbackup has a disadvantage; it slow down restores. There is support cases at Veritas confirming that when using incremental backups, restore times can take up to 10 times normal time. The solution for this, according to Veritas, is to use full backups instea

Re: SAP R/3 error messages

2002-04-18 Thread Mahesh Prasad
As per my knowledge BRxxx messages are SAP R/3's own messages and can be found in BRBACKUP and BRARCHIVE log files located in oracle//sapbackup and /oracle//saparch directories. These log files and message numbers have nothing to do with TDP for R/3. You will get BRxxx messages when you are taking

Re: 2 identical libraries and 1 TSM Server.

2002-04-18 Thread Norback, Jan
Fran, You can find a device table on here: http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/devices/atab101.htm Note: we use W2K with the TSM device driver (TSM 4.2.1) and started with device 257 in our 3584. Regards, Jan Norback -Original Message- From: Francisco Molero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

"My" TSM does not like Librarystation

2002-04-18 Thread Tom Bisaz
Folks I try to have TSM 4.2.2, resp. the included ACSLSAPI programs (ssi, mini_el) talk to a libstation running on OS/390. No errormessage on startup /usr/tivoli/tsm/devices/bin/rc.acs_ssi, but lbtest option 51 & 52 just dont give me something usefull back. The connection to libstation basically w

Re: SAN Problem - TDP for SAP on Windows 2000 (It is Tivoli flash 3)

2002-04-18 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Paul, This look like the problem Tivoli have already warned us in their 3-rd flash alert (http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/flash_hba.html) >From TSM Support page (http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/index.html) select "Flashes & Known Problems" and from there go to "FLASH 3 - Plea

Re: New Tivoli licensing - what "processor" mean (RESOLVED)

2002-04-18 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Old Value-Based Pricing (VBP) scheme was distinguishing only the *servers* but not clients. New Enhanced VBP (EVBP) is counting the number of processors on both servers and nodes: 1. Processors managed by the product (i.e. processors on TSM nodes) 2. Processors in which the managing server is inst

Re: SAN Problem - TDP for SAP on Windows 2000

2002-04-18 Thread Gerrit van Zyl
Thanks Paul, I'll try it and let you know. Regards Gerrit van Zyl -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Seay, Paul Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SAN Problem - TDP for SAP on Windows 2000 Been

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Remco Post
> Not specifically TSM question but more of a question to better > understand how to discuss pro's/cons to other competing products. > > Since my background is all TSM, I'm curious on how the other competitors > handle media. Is my assumption correct that they waste a lot of tape > space? As far a

2 identical libraries and 1 TSM Server.

2002-04-18 Thread Francisco Molero
Hi all, I have 2 libraries 3584. When I define the drives in the first library no pb. def drive lib1 drive1 element=256 But when I define de drive in de second library. def drive LIB2 DRIVE55 element=256 I get a msg : ANR8419E DEFINE DRIVE: element conflicts... 1.- What should the element be?

Re: Veritas/Legato/ArcServ

2002-04-18 Thread Seay, Paul
I can speak to Veritas NetBackup. You are correct that a tape is created for each full and incremental, but there is a feature in NetBackup that allows you to multiplex the server saves to a single tape up to a limit you specify. This really great until you try to duplicate the tapes for offsite