[Bug 573102] [NEW] not current version
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mp3c The current version of mp3c is 0.31, released in 2006: http://www.wspse.de/WSPse/Linux-MP3c.php3 It'd be neat if the version available in the repositories could be updated. ** Affects: mp3c (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- not current version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390238] Re: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text
The full text is: " Ripping speed is extremly slow for the last 5 minutes by now. Due to extraction quality, audex is so configured, never skip any detected error. So if your disc is really broken extracting maybe never ends. In some cases only this drive can't rip audio data from this disc. Maybe try another one. However, do you want to continue extraction? " It also pops up in less than 5 minutes sometimes. :) -- Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430348] Re: NFS root device never ready
I updated my nfs root Karmic install and tried again - same problem persists. Similarly, all of my Karmix systems are having troubles with NFS mounts at boot time. Since Jaunty, IIRC, they all initially indicate that they've failed to mount nfs volumes at boot time - usually with that "hit esc to get a recovery shell" message. After waiting a few moments, the mounts come up fine and boot continues. Recently, I was surprised to notice how quickly a SystemRescue CD (on the same network as these Karmic machines) mounted an NFS volume. Do the Gentoo folks know something about the portmapper that we don't? -- NFS root device never ready https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430348 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557016] [NEW] alsactl depends on X11
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: alsa-utils ...While trying to store modified mixer settings on a remote machine over ssh: sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo alsactl store Home directory /home/sauer not ours. sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo HOME=/root alsactl store X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo -i r...@hotrod:~# alsactl store X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed It seems like the store command shouldn't need to open an X11 connection. Ultimately, I changed the permissions on /var/lib/alsa/asound.state to be owned by the audio group and group writable - which actually seems like a reasonable thing to do outside of this bug. :) sa...@hotrod:~$ lsb_release -sd Ubuntu lucid (development branch) sa...@hotrod:~$ apt-cache policy alsa-utils alsa-utils: Installed: 1.0.22-0ubuntu5 Candidate: 1.0.22-0ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1.0.22-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: alsa-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- alsactl depends on X11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557016] Re: alsactl depends on X11
So, if I kill pulseaudio on the system (which was previously running), and if ssh isn't forwarding anything from my workstation, shouldn't that rule pulse out? sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo alsactl store Home directory /home/sauer not ours. sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo -i alsactl store X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo /etc/init.d/pulseaudio stop * PulseAudio configured for per-user sessions sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo killall pulseaudio sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ ps ax | grep pulse 9000 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep pulse sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo alsactl store Home directory /home/sauer not ours. sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ sudo -i alsactl store X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed sa...@hotrod:/var/lib/mythtv/videos$ ps ax | grep pulse 9010 pts/1S+ 0:00 grep pulse -- alsactl depends on X11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557016] Re: alsactl depends on X11
Well, if there are no processes running with "pulse" in their name, I ran "alsactl", and the error message mentions the contents of $HOME or "failure to initiate an X11 connection" - I'm not sure how that's "clearly" pulse to a normal person who's not familiar with every string in libpulsecommon.so. :) All I've done is freshly install Lucid beta 1 using the alternate disk, update and dist-upgrade to get current, add the mythtv-frontend package, and turn on the PCM output using alsamixer. I've literally only spent a couple of hours on a fresh install on this particular machine. I played with it a little more, and clearing the DISPLAY variable before running the command makes the error message go away. In either case - with or without DISPLAY existing - the asound.state file is actually created. I ran an strace on alsactl, and sure enough, it's loading the pulse library and attempting to connect to the machine listed in DISPLAY right before that error message (pulse and X11 libs are loaded either way). So, I guess there's mostly a UI issue here: An error message is displayed which seems to indicate failure, even though the intended action is actually completed. I'd question why alsamixer is using pulse at all, but at this point, I'd be happy if either alsa or pulse somehow suppressed ignorable error messages. -- alsactl depends on X11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580803] [NEW] eBay change broke esniper recently
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: esniper A change has been committed to eSniper CVS which updates the HTML parsing code to work with the updated eBay layout. Without integrating this change into the version shipped with Ubuntu, the program is rendered inoperable. The CVS commit message indicates: "fix for "Cannot find bid table header" ebay now uses instead of and adds an invisible text "Member id:" before the member name in the bid history ta" And this change impacts a few files; one example is html.c, viewable at http://esniper.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/esniper/esniper/html.c?view=log An updated version available in all supported versions of Ubuntu would be convenient. :) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: esniper 2.22.0-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri May 14 22:33:05 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/esniper InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LANGUAGE= SourcePackage: esniper ** Affects: esniper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ebay lucid -- eBay change broke esniper recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580803] Re: eBay change broke esniper recently
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48476241/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48476242/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48476243/ProcStatus.txt -- eBay change broke esniper recently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581084] Re: parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513466/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513467/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513468/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "UsbCreatorLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513469/UsbCreatorLog.txt ** Attachment added: "UsbDevices.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48513470/UsbDevices.txt -- parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581084] [NEW] parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usb-creator I fought with usb-creator for a few hours before I found that parted wasn't installed. I initially installed ubuntu 9.04 base, then immediately updated to 10.4 (long story, don't ask why) and added the ubuntu-netbook metapackage. The usb-creator-gtk pakage was installed as part of that process, but parted was not. I also attempted a "sudo apt- get install --reinstall usb-creator", which also didn't intall parted. Ergo, there's a dependency problem somewhere. This was only a problem on my netbook. My workstations running ubuntu and ubuntu desktop don't seem to have this issue, as they work fine. Maybe something else in the desktop already brings parted in, I haven't checked. Looking at the dependencies, none of the usb-creator* packages appear to actually depend on parted. I'd be inclined to say that usb-creator- common is probably the real package which should depend on parted, but in any case, if the thing is going to directly call parted, that should be a dependency. :) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: usb-creator-gtk 0.2.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat May 15 15:35:26 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/usb-creator-gtk InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.utf8 SourcePackage: usb-creator ** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid parted ubuntu-une -- parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 581084] Re: parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator
Unfortunately, the usb-creator log file apport-bug attached came from a run I did after installing parted. So ignore that. :) -- parted dependency not present on usb-startup-creator https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581084 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 511855] Re: Program checks for updated version and refuses to run when there is one
This is technically a dup; it refuses to run because the updated version fixes incompatability introduced by changes to the eBay site. -- Program checks for updated version and refuses to run when there is one https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511855 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 441194] Re: device nodes seem to be missing
** Also affects: eeepclinux Importance: Undecided Status: New -- device nodes seem to be missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441194 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.
This fix breaks CloudFront URLs, because the reencoding of URLs results in some HTML entities being replaced by their plain characters. CloudFront signing requires that the the whole URL matches the signature, as compared to S3 URLs which prune the querystring before validating the signature. That explains why this fix worked ok on S3. I'll open a new bug since this is so old that reopening doesn't make sense, but also making a note here for future web search purposes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651923 Title: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1651923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925833] [NEW] apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing
Public bug reported: CloudFront URL signing requires that the the whole URL matches the signature, as compared to S3 URLs which prune the querystring before validating the signature. The URL re-parsing which I'm pretty sure was introduced in resolving #1651923 decodes some HTML entities which were encoded before signing. That invalidates the signature and results in permission denied errors. In my case, the equal and semicolon chars from the return-content-disposition header are being decoded, but it applies to any entity which is "optionally" encoded. Personally, I think that the URL returned in a Location: redirect header should be handled as-is, and if some piece of garbage http server is generating redirects which contain spaces or are otherwise invalid, the problem lies with the web server generating invalid redirects and not in apt failing to follow broken URLs. I say that knowing full well that the http spec says those things should be identical, so CloudFront also falls into the general "garbage" category by breaking the spec by requiring a specific format for identical characters. Either way, things are what they are. Rather than unnecessarily fully reencoding the URL, I'd suggest that apt-transport-https (and presumably the http transport as well, but I don't know) should at most just replace the spaces with plusses or %20s to keep the original bug resolved without breaking other stuff. :) PS: I tried to report this against the apt-transport-https package, but the bug tool says that doesn't exist in Ubuntu. That's weird, considering it's definitely a package (https://packages.ubuntu.com/groovy/apt-transport-https), so I assume the apt maintainer will know how to triage. Sorry. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925833 Title: apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1925833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925833] Re: apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing
Great, thanks for sharing both answers. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925833 Title: apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1925833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1778934] [NEW] update version to 1.4.0
Public bug reported: Version 1.4.0 was released in 2014 (https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/pam_radius/releases). There were several changes then, but the important ones are the "force_prompt" and the "prompt=xxx" parameters which allow us to say "hardware token" for our use of radius in an MFA solution. While the most recent release on github (and consequently on the freeradius site - https://freeradius.org/sub_projects/) is 1.4.0, the master branch indicates the version to be 1.4.1. I'm not terribly concerned with whether 1.4.0 or 1.4.1 is used, but it'd be nice to have the new options which aren't present in the 1.3.17 version which Ubuntu has shipped for the last decade. :) ** Affects: libpam-radius-auth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778934 Title: update version to 1.4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-radius-auth/+bug/1778934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577554] Re: pxelinux.0 - Failed to load ldlinux.c32
Apparently a workaround is to copy /usr/lib/syslinux/modules/bios/ldlinux.c32 (from the syslinux-common package) to your file root alongside pexlinux.0. That (annoyingly) works for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577554 Title: pxelinux.0 - Failed to load ldlinux.c32 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslinux/+bug/1577554/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573102] Re: not current version
I don't know that it's invalid until the versions which do include it are out of update support. Since 12.04 isn't even released yet, I'd think not. :) But then, I don't know the guidelines for that sort of thing. I'm disappointed to see it gone in 12.04; configurable text-mode ripping is convenient. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573102 Title: not current version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mp3c/+bug/573102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 527938] Re: [upstream] Open office crashes when trying to set up Bibliography Database
I understand that we're waiting for upstream, though I'm on-board with Mike Bridge's dialog suggestion. When I attempted to use the help functionality, openoffice.org informed me that I needed to install the appropriate help package. However, had I not found this bug report, it would have never dawned upon me that 1) I need to install a package named "base" - not "bib" or similar and 2) that the openoffice.org-base package isn't something installed with openoffice.org out of the box. It seems like something called "base" is rather "basic" and should be part of the "base" install. :) -- [upstream] Open office crashes when trying to set up Bibliography Database https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527938 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350280] Re: [jaunty] digikam will not add smb folder
I'm still seeing this bug in Digikam 2:1.4.0-0ubuntu under Lucid. -- [jaunty] digikam will not add smb folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350280] Re: [jaunty] digikam will not add smb folder
Rather, this "behavior". -- [jaunty] digikam will not add smb folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350280 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695267] [NEW] can't configure dvdrip-queue
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dvdrip-queue
The dvdrip-queue program (0.1.3-0.1ubuntu2 on maverick, and probably all
the other releases) uses an invalid name in the ConfigParser module.
When you go to the app's preferences and attempt to change the
directory, the below happens:
sa...@trogdor:~$ dvdrip-queue
/usr/bin/dvdrip-queue.real:53: GtkWarning: Ignoring the separator setting
self.wTree = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile)
(dvdrip-queue.real:21217): libglade-WARNING **: could not find a parent that
handles internal children for `vbox'
loading *.rip files... done
/usr/share/dvdrip-queue/dvdripQueue/prefsWindow.py:32: GtkWarning:
GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated
self.wTree = gtk.glade.XML(self.gladefile)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/dvdrip-queue/dvdripQueue/prefsWindow.py", line 113, in
applyPrefs
config.add_section("DEFAULT")
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/ConfigParser.py", line 242, in add_section
raise ValueError, 'Invalid section name: %s' % section
ValueError: Invalid section name: DEFAULT
Note that it's trying to use a section in teh config file named DEFAULT.
That's not an allowed section name. If I open up
/var/lib/mythtv/videos/tmp//swc2/avi/006/audio-video-psu/swc2-006-av-psu-00.av
and replace all instances of DEFAULT with some other string - I used "jimmie" -
it suddenly works fine. This is not surprising, since all case variantrs of
default are ignored by the functions being called:
http://docs.python.org/library/configparser.html#ConfigParser.RawConfigParser.add_section
This code could never possibly work; I'm not sure how it was released since
it clearly has never been tested.
Therefore, my suggestion is to change the string DEFAULT to pretty much
any word other than default.
I would have reported this on the project Sourceforge page, but there
doesn't appear to be a bug reporting area defined for the project. :/
** Affects: dvdrip-queue (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695267
Title:
can't configure dvdrip-queue
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 695267] Re: can't configure dvdrip-queue
Ok, there's more to it than that, since the rest of the code assumes it's reading defaults. Creating the .ini file by hand to look like sa...@trogdor:~$ cat .dvdrip-queue [DEFAULT] maxencodetime = 360.0 datadirectory = /mnt/dvdrip/tmp works. But that's aggrevating and poorly documented. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695267 Title: can't configure dvdrip-queue -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1410589] [NEW] Upgrade fails with no usable explanation
Public bug reported: Attempting to run "do-release-upgrade -p" because the signature of a plain "do-release-upgrade" has a purportedly invalid signature. This is an upgrade from an up-to-date 12.05.5-LTS to 14.04.1-LTS, pulling packages through squid-deb-proxy on another machine, using the command- line updater over ssh. The updater starts up, switches software sources, pulls down the new information, and then exits, telling me only: ... Calculating the changes Could not calculate the upgrade An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command 'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' in a terminal. ... This is not particularly helpful, as it doesn't give me any clue whatsoever as to what packages are potentially conflicting, or if the problem is even on my end. It would be nice if the tools indicated that there were debug logs somewhere, or game me a hint as to what packages are involved, or drew an ASCII-art guy on a bicycle from a 1990's usenet signature block, or /something/ beyond simply taking its ball and going home. I suspect that there's an issue with using the postgres packages from the postgres repository rather than the official Ubuntu packages. But that's just a wild guess based on previous conflicts rather than anything based on what's really going on. I'll eventually track down what the problem is here, but meanwhile this is, I guess, a feature request for somewhat more usable failure messages. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.156.14.17 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-65.99-generic-pae 3.2.60 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-65-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.8 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jan 13 18:26:15 2015 MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2015-01-14 (0 days ago) ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug dist-upgrade i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410589 Title: Upgrade fails with no usable explanation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1410589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1446921] [NEW] package missing term "openssl" in initial description
Public bug reported: When attempting to compile a product, the "./configure" stage indicates that openssl-dev is missing. I have openssl installed, but there is no package named anything like openssl-dev or openssl-devel. Also, running "aptitude search openssl" does not show "libssl-dev". It seems reasonable to expect that the development package would show up in a general search for the name of the package. It's not hard to do a good search for "ubuntu openssl dev" and come up with several people asking the question (and getting an answer), but it seems likely that I'll probably forget this again next time I need to do it. It would be nice to either add an "openssl-dev" virtual package which points at "libssl-dev," or to work the term "openssl" into the first part of the description that something like "aptitude search" would find. Yes, "apt-cache search openssl | grep dev" does find it, so maybe the real bug is that I seem to remember "aptitude search" instead of "apt-cache search." :) I'd prioritize this pretty low. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10 Package: libssl-dev 1.0.1f-1ubuntu9.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-43.72-generic 3.13.11.11 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-43-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8.4 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Apr 21 20:05:04 2015 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-07-01 (295 days ago) InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140416.2) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openssl UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to utopic on 2015-01-10 (102 days ago) ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446921 Title: package missing term "openssl" in initial description To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1446921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782890] Re: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade
This happened on my lucid-to-precise upgrade. I didn't even have the Ping6Path in my config.pl; I would have never thought that maybe the tool would use IPV6 on a network without IPV6. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782890 Title: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/782890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782890] Re: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade
I'm pretty sure this is a bug in BackupPC, since: sauer@pyro:~$ lsmod | grep -c ipv6 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782890 Title: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/782890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782890] Re: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade
Oh. I guess that's not a module any more, because I'm behind the times on my legacy IPv4 network. :) So, to check if this is the problem, you can temporarily disable IPv6: sauer@pyro:~$ ip addr show lo 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever sauer@pyro:~$ sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 0 sauer@pyro:~$ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1 sauer@pyro:~$ ip addr show lo 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo Note that the IPv6 translation address pops up on all interfaces when the disable setting is 0, and goes away immediately when the disable setting is set to 1. To make this permanent on 12.04, create a file named /etc/sysctl.conf.d/60-disableipv6.conf and add a line that says net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1. I'm partial to running: sauer@pyro:~$ echo "net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1" | sudo tee /etc/sysctl.d/60-disableipv6.conf net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1 The setting in that file will take effect when you reboot or reload the sysctl settings by running "sudo start procps". This is still a bug in Precise, IMHO. If IPv6 is going to be enabled by default on the systems, then the Ping6 command should be set in backuppc.pl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782890 Title: no ping response on all hosts after upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/782890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745540] Re: Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
Updated four machines from up-to-date natty (all of which were working
with u1 before) to Oneiric beta2 last night. Three laptops all worked
fine, but the desktop ended up with an ubuntu one which would just sit
and spin on the account page (and all others). I removed all files
named ubuntuone, removed the ubuntu one key from the gnome keyring,
killed all ubnutuone processes, and ran u1sdtool -q. I also removed
this machine from my Ubuntu One account through the web interface. I've
tried doing all that and logging out / logging back in, and tried
rebooting after doing all that. Ubuntu One still will not reconnect -
giving this error - even though this is basically a new machine as far
as it should know. Using the incorrect credentials does fail as
expected. No PPAs are enabled.
I did an update and a dist-upgrade within the past 5 minutes, and the
ubuntu-one-client was included in the update. The problem did not go
away during the session in which I performed the update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745540
Title:
Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface
"org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/745540/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557054] Re: Libvirt-bin ignores libvirtd_opts from /etc/default
Why, two years later, is the file in /etc/default even created if it's not used? And yes, this is still present in 11.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557054 Title: Libvirt-bin ignores libvirtd_opts from /etc/default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/557054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994533] Re: difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package has a corrupted checksum
Is it a huge coincidence that my system has encountered the exact same
behavior (including the same "bad" checksum) this morning when I
attempted to update?
...
(Reading database ... 518114 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libldap-2.4-2:i386 (from
.../libldap-2.4-2_2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.2_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libldap-2.4-2_2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.2_i386.deb (--unpack):
conffile './etc/ldap/ldap.conf' is not in sync with other instances of the
same package
No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already
dpkg-deb: error:
subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libldap-2.4-2_2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.2_i386.deb
...
sauer@hotrod:~$ dpkg-query -f='${PackageSpec}\t${Version}\n${Conffiles}\n' -W
'libldap-2.4-2:*'
libldap-2.4-2 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.2
/etc/ldap/ldap.conf 7fac807f65d84394410881bc16f1198a
libldap-2.4-2:i386
sauer@hotrod:~$ uname -a
Linux hotrod 3.2.0-39-generic #62-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 28 00:28:53 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
sauer@hotrod:~$ lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533
Title:
difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package
has a corrupted checksum
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/994533/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994533] Re: difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package has a corrupted checksum
BTW, my actual installed /etc/ldap/ldap.conf is a symlink to /etc/ldap.conf, which is locally modified. I wonder if the underlying issue is related to that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994533 Title: difficult to recover a system when a conffile of a M-A: same package has a corrupted checksum To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/994533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390238] apport information
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 InstallationDate: Installed on 2009-12-12 (1279 days ago) InstallationMedia: Mythbuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.4) MarkForUpload: True NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: audex 0.74~b1-1.1ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-23.34-generic 3.8.11 Tags: raring Uname: Linux 3.8.0-23-generic i686 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-05-23 (22 days ago) UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin mythtv plugdev sambashare video -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238 Title: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audex/+bug/390238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390238] Re: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text
Since it's been 4 years and there was no crash to begin with, this information is not going to be real useful. I'm pretty sure the apport stuff was either brand new or not quite released when this happened. But sure, I guess I'll run that command now. I haven't even used the app since the last time I updated this 3.5 years ago, so I honestly don't even know if the buttons are still backwards. or if that dialog still exists. :) ** Tags added: apport-collected raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238 Title: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audex/+bug/390238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390238] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238/+attachment/3702803/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238 Title: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audex/+bug/390238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390238] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238/+attachment/3702804/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390238 Title: Cancel extraction dialog with wrong text To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audex/+bug/390238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745540] Re: Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
Similarly for me - renaming the keyring file and creating a new keyring
just makes the login prompt for UbuntuOne tell me that the keyring
wasn't unlocked, or that a user pressed cancel on a dialog. It appears
that Gnome Keyring just can't update keyring files.
I attached strace to the gnome keyring file, and this is the interesting
part that happens:
open("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/default", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
stat64("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700, st_size=4096,
...}) = 0
stat64("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600,
st_size=2476, ...}) = 0
sendmsg(8, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(2)=[{"l\3\1\1P\0\0\0\207\1\0\0O\0\0\0\6\1s\0\6\0\0\0:1.325\0\0"...,
96}, {"K\0\0\0Object does not have the 'or"..., 80}], msg_controllen=0,
msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 176
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN},
{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=15, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 6, -1) =
1 ([{fd=8, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(8, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(1)=[{"l\1\0\0012\0\0\0001\0\0\0\227\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre"...,
2048}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC}, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = 218
recvmsg(8, 0xbffd67c8, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
It repeatedly tries to open a file named default - which does not exist
- and then ultimately does this:
send(16, "<35>Oct 16 15:16:51 gnome-keyrin"..., 110, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 110
write(2, "\n** (gnome-keyring-daemon:2080):"..., 109) = -1 EBADF (Bad file
descriptor)
time(NULL) = 1318796211
send(16, "<36>Oct 16 15:16:51 gnome-keyrin"..., 129, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 129
write(2, "\n** (gnome-keyring-daemon:2080):"..., 127) = -1 EBADF (Bad file
descriptor)
sendmsg(8, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(2)=[{"l\3\1\1)\0\0\0\212\1\0\0O\0\0\0\6\1s\0\6\0\0\0:1.325\0\0"...,
96}, {"$\0\0\0Couldn't create item: Intern"..., 41}], msg_controllen=0,
msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 137
On a later attempt, I see this:
link("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring",
"/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring.temp-1811546333") = 0
gettimeofday({1318796511, 400588}, NULL) = 0
open("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/.temp-2MBJ3V",
O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) = 22
write(22, "GnomeKeyring\n\r\0\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\5login\0\0\0"..., 2476) = 2476
fsync(22) = 0
close(22) = 0
rename("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/.temp-2MBJ3V",
"/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring") = 0
unlink("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/login.keyring.temp-1811546333") = 0
sendmsg(8, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(2)=[{"l\3\1\1\35\0\0\0\222\1\0\0O\0\0\0\6\1s\0\6\0\0\0:1.325\0\0"...,
96}, {"\30\0\0\0Couldn't set item secret\0", 29}], msg_controllen=0,
msg_flags=0}, MSG_NOSIGNAL) = 125
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN},
{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=15, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 6, -1) =
1 ([{fd=8, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(8, {msg_name(0)=NULL,
msg_iov(1)=[{"l\1\0\1\274\1\0\0D\0\0\0\267\0\0\0\1\1o\0(\0\0\0/org/fre"...,
2048}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC}, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = 644
recvmsg(8, 0xbffd67c8, MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=12, events=POLLIN}, {fd=14, events=POLLIN},
{fd=5, events=POLLIN}, {fd=15, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}], 6, 0) =
0 (Timeout)
open("/home/sauer/.gnome2/keyrings/default", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
So, this time at least it's updating a temp file - but since it appears
to have failed to insert the record, it also can't update the secret
file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745540
Title:
Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface
"org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/745540/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745540] Re: Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
Later on, I copied my existing login.keyring to a file named
"default,keyring". That caused the ubuntuOne application to prompt me
to create a new keyring named default. If I typed a password in, each
time, I would be told that a user pressed cancel on the application.
But if I allowed the keyring daemon to "create a new keyring named
default", and just hit ok with no password (and clicked "store passwords
insecurely"), It worked fine.
I'm now connected to UbuntuOne on the broken machine, but in the
passwords and keys app, I have an empty keyring named default, my old
keyring named login, and a new one named default_1 which contains my
UbuntuOne password.
Oddly, the file command shows that default_1.keyring is just ASCII text, while
the login.keyring is recognized as
login.keyring:GNOME keyring, major version 0, minor version 0, crypto
type 0 (AEL), hash type 0 (MD5), name "login", last modified Mon Dec 14
08:11:29 2009, created Mon Dec 14 08:11:29 2009, not locked if idle, hash
iterations 1653, salt 3211078258452735141, 6 item(s)
So, I went in and changed the password on default_1 - the new keyring
created when I started up UbuntuOne. I could still run u1sdtool -q /
-c, and it would reconnect fine. Then I shut down UbuntuOne, deleted
the UbuntuOne password from default_1, and ran u1sdtool -c. It opened
up the login prompt as it should, and went ahead and logged in. It
created a new entry (ID #2, even though #1 was deleted) in the default_1
keyring.
So, this seems to be a collection of keyring failures:
1) creating a new-format keyring with a password always returns failure
(probably because it defaults to not being unlocked?)
2) whatever call UbuntuOne is using, it can't seem to add entries to the old
format keyring
2a) the password and keys app can happily add and remove passwords from both
the new and old-format keyrings
The full workaround for UbuntuOne appears to be
1) move old keyring file out of the way
2) allow UbuntuOne to create a new keyring with an empty password
3) move the old keyrinng back into the keyrings directory
4) start up Passwords and Keys and set an actual password on the new keyring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745540
Title:
Method "CreateItem" with signature "a{sv}(oayay)b" on interface
"org.freedesktop.Secret.Collection" doesn't exist
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwibber/+bug/745540/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 187078] Re: dvd95 The version currently in Hardy is French and not english
3.5 years later, dvd95 is still showing up as French on my otherwise English system with a default Ubuntu 11.04 install. When will the "released fix" actually be integrated? :) This issue is also reported in #194062, which appears to be a partial duplicate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187078 Title: dvd95 The version currently in Hardy is French and not english To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvd95/+bug/187078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 712710] Re: update-passwd igonres ldap
Scenario:
Group "printers" is defined in LDAP with GID=4 because that's how it was
always defined in some legacy corporate Unix environment. All users who
are allowed to print are a member of this group. A local administrator
notices this and configures his system to have the "adm" group - which
Ubuntu wants to be GID=4 - to have a GID of 1004.
The nsswitch.conf file is configured to use files then LDAP for group
lookups (which most any tool or how-to will do) , and the sudoers file
which comes with Ubuntu grants unlimited access to people in the adm
group, Time passes, and everything works. The admin decides that this
Ubuntu thing is alright, that the Q/A system doesn't suck, and updates
seem to work well. He decides to enable automatic instalation of
updates.
Oh no! There's a security-related update to base-passwd! Well, rest
easy admin - the automatic update setting will pull the update down and
install it. The update-passwd tool, running in "assume yes" mode,
helpfully notices that some foolish admin has changed the adm GID to
something other than 4, so it changes it back. It sends an email, but
the admins don't notice that email amid all the other notifications that
they only spot-check.
Now, when users log in, they still get membership in the printers group
from LDAP. The system still records this in the group vector as "4",
because that's the number returned by a getgrnam("printers") call. So,
file access and whatnot based on the printers group still works just
like it always has. No one notices that running "id" or "groups" shows
them as a member of adm - because no one runs those commands in normal
day to-day usage. They don't do an "ls -l" on the print queues, either,
and most programs don't do a double reverse-lookup from name to gid and
back to name just to ensure that things are kosher. But eventually, a
malicious user does notice that he's a member of the adm group - because
this is what a getgrgid(4) returns. Maybe he ran "groups". Who knows.
Oh, and he runs "sudo -l". Since sudo uses the name of the group, it
doesn't notice that the GID has changed; it doesn't care that there's a
conflict. "My, look at the sudo rule I've gained..."
Now everyone who used to only be able to print because they were in the
printers group (or whatever the LDAP GID=4 groul granted, you get the
point) has unlimited sudo access. One "sudo -i" later, and the logs
have been tampered with, removing a way of tracking down the malicious
user. All because update-passwd didn't bother to respect the NSS
settings, and modified the local group file in an unsafe way.
This is not a particularly contrived situation; as part of a team which
manages several thousand Unix systems from multiple vendors (and which
is finally in the process of moving to a centralized user repository), I
see local-remote UID/GID mismatches pretty regularly. It usually
doesn't result in this kind of privilege escalation, but then, maybe we
just missed it. :)
As such,I maintain that this bug at least enables a security problem, if
not causing one outright.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712710
Title:
update-passwd igonres ldap
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 557016] Re: alsactl should ignore the pulse plugin
That's an interesting theory, Raymond, but it ignores the fact that the state file is created/modified as expected, as noted in the following quote from post #4. :) "In either case - with or without DISPLAY existing - the asound.state file is actually created." Specifically: sa...@hotrod:~$ ls -l /var/lib/alsa/asound.state -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10059 2010-11-02 22:03 /var/lib/alsa/asound.state sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo -i alsactl store X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed sa...@hotrod:~$ ls -l /var/lib/alsa/asound.state -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10059 2010-11-02 22:04 /var/lib/alsa/asound.state sa...@hotrod:~$ unset DISPLAY sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo -i alsactl store sa...@hotrod:~$ ls -l /var/lib/alsa/asound.state -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10059 2010-11-02 22:05 /var/lib/alsa/asound.state Note that the timestamp on the files changes each time (I waited a minute or so between runs). If I couldn't write to the file, I'd instead get this message: alsactl: save_state:1530: Cannot open /var/lib/alsa/asound.state for writing: Permission denied All that's really wrong is that an error is generated by pulse, but the error doesn't actually matter for anything because everything actually works just fine. Well, except for emitting of an ignorable error message; even the return code is still 0. ;) sa...@hotrod:~$ sudo -i alsactl store; echo $? X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. XOpenDisplay() failed 0 So this is properly categorized with importance of "wishlist". IMHO. -- alsactl should ignore the pulse plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496435] Re: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR
I encountered this bug today upgrading Kubuntu from a clean 10.04 install to 10.10 using the update-manager tool. The machine is 32-bit. It has no SATA controller at all. It's not a Dell (it's an older Asus- based dual athlon MP system). There is only one hard drive in the system. There is no other operating system on the machine; just one bootable partition which has Ubuntu installed. There were no errors during the install, except that a reboot left me hanging at "error: the symbol 'grub_xputs' not found" with a grub rescue prompt. The only odd thing about the drives in this system is that there are two DVD burners on the on-board ATA controller, there is one ATA-133 drive attached to a 3Ware 8-port IDE RAID controller (Escalade 7500-8), and I have /boot set up as a separate partition, with an LVM root. I came here due to bug #609280 being marked a dup of this one. I can run "ls /" at the prompt, and it shows that there is a grub/normal.mod file visible. However, when I try to insmod grub/normal.mod, I get the undefined symbol message from above. Did Canonical hire the former Gentoo quality assurance team? :) I upgraded two (single drive) laptops today as well, and they both had kernel problems post-reboot. And now this bug which has been open for a year? Really? Sigh, off to find the rescue disks. Lemme know if there's any further information I can contribute which helps fix this. Or any further poking upstream Debian with a stick I can do. -- upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496435] Re: upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR
@Jordan - I technically have 2 drive controllers. One RAID controller exposing a single drive, and one PCI ATA-133 controller holding two optical drives. I'm not sure how this bug could be considered "fixed" if grub is still failing to identify the correct drive upon which it actually needs to install. That behavior would seem to inherently be required for this bug to be closed - and observation indicates that the behavior desired is not complete. However, I agree that the description doesn't match well (I just followed the dup). I'll continue follow-up in the newly unrelated bug report - #609280. :) -- upgrades of the grub-pc package can overwrite wrong MBR https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496435 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
