Bug#718580: ITP: mayan -- Django-based Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)
Hi Mathias! On 2014-02-02 at 14:00, Mathias Behrle wrote: > I am just starting to use mayan and I want to ask, if there are already some > results for this ITP. This only to give feedback, that I am interested to have > this package in Debian as well. Actually, the packaging is in stall because some of the build dependencies aren't available as independent packages in Debian. There were a couple of Python modules that prevented me to start working seriously on Mayan. I discovered that Python environments are not allowed (or, at least, appreciated) in Debian packaging. So I need to understand even that part of the process. Given that, if you are in a hurry for using Mayan, then you'd better start breathing again and use the python-env system for now. I'll keep you updated on the progresses I may achieve with this package, if you are interested in this task. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#714040: transition: glew
Control: retitle -1 transition: glew 1.10 Hi again! On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Update: after a quick rebuild against pure unstable, it seems like > that even arb failure has to be considered as glew-related. On July 22nd, 2013 a new upstream version (1.10.0) was released. On October 27th, 2013 it has been uploaded to experimental suite. Former FTBFS packages (arb and bino) in unstable now build fine against this new version, as you can see at [1] and [2] respectively. Following, the new ben file updated to track the transition for this new stable release. Thanks for your time and patience. Ben file: title = "glew"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libglew1.7" | .depends ~ "libglewmx1.7" | .depends ~ "libglew1.10" | .depends ~ "libglewmx1.10"; is_good = .depends ~ "libglew1.10" | .depends ~ "libglewmx1.10"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libglew1.7" | .depends ~ "libglewmx1.7"; [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/arb_5.5-4/ [2] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/bino_1.4.2-1/ -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#733931: yafaray-exporter: Cannot activate addon
Hi! On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 12:42:39PM +0100, Joseph Tannhuber wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > the addon does not work at all. If I try to activate the addon in blender > (File -> User > Preferences -> Addons -> Render -> Render: YafaRay Exporter), it fails with > following error message: > Error > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/modules/addon_utils.py", line 298 in enable >mod=__import__(module_name) > File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/addons/yafaray/__init__.py", line 80, in > >from.import prop > ImportError: cannot import name prop YafaRay upstream is almost discontinued and even if I asked million times for tags in the source, actually I don't know which modification/commit brings the exporter to work fine with blender 2.69; this is the main reason why I haven't updated it yet. If the situation upstream-side doesn't change, I'm thinking about asking the complete removal of yafaray packages, engine and exporter. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720592: transition: libebml
Hi! On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:36:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > What about vlc? It builds fine, as you can see at [1]. And mkvtoolnix builds fine too [2]. Obviously, libmatroska builds. So, it should be ok for the transition now ;-) Cheers. [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/vlc_2.1.0-2/ [2] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/mkvtoolnix_6.5.0-1/ -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720592: transition: libebml
Hi again! On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:54:28AM +0100, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > [...] > Obviously, libmatroska builds. For the sake of completeness, I've also tested that libmatroska 1.3.0-2 (in unstable/sid) builds fine against this new version and it does indeed, as you can see at [1]. Cheers. [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/libmatroska_1.3.0-2/ -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#729071: transition: libmatroska
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for the (little) transition of libmatroska package. A testing-purpose package (1.4.0-1) was uploaded to experimental suite on June 30th; an updating upload (1.4.1-1) is available on experimental since September 23rd. The reverse dependencies in unstable for this transition are: * mkvtoolnix * vlc and none of them seems to FTBFS against this new library version, as can be seen at [1],[2]. Thanks for your time and patience. [1] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/mkvtoolnix_6.5.0-1/ [2] http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/experimental/pool/vlc_2.1.0-2/ Ben file: title = "libmatroska"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libmatroska5" | .depends ~ "libmatroska6"; is_good = .depends ~ "libmatroska6"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libmatroska5"; -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#751672: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#751672: openimageio: please include verbatim license text
Hi! On Jun 15, 2014 2:27 PM, "Ansgar Burchardt" wrote: > > Source: openimageio > Version: 1.4.9~dfsg0-1 > > Please include the verbatim license text as used upstream. The > BSD-3-clause block talks about "the name of the University nor the names > of its contributors" which is not the wording used upstream. > > src\dpx.imageio\libdpx\DPXStream.h also has a different wording. > > Also src/ptex.imageio/ptex/* is not released under a BSD-2-clause > license. src\ptex.imageio\ptex\PtexSeparableFilter.cpp has a third > clause about names. > > src/include/tbb/* is not (or no longer) included in the upstream > tarball. I was so focused on getting this new version work that I completely forgot to check the debian/copyright. My fault. I'm on vacation now. Gonna fix it next week. Thanks for reporting. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
Bug#752160: blender FTBFS on alpha: that alpha is a 64bit arch is not fully detected.
Hi Michael! On Jun 20, 2014 12:18 PM, "Michael Cree" wrote: > > Source: blender > Version: 2.70a-2 > Severity: important > User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: alpha > Justification: Fails to build from source but built in the past. > > blender FTBFS on alpha because it is a 64bit arch but is not listed in > the patch 0011-fix_FTBFS_on_unofficial_64bit_archs.patch thus the build > fails with: > > cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-alpha-linux-gnu/source/blender/makesdna/intern && ../../../../bin/makesdna /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-alpha-linux-gnu/source/blender/makesdna/intern/dna.c /«PKGBUILDDIR»/source/blender/makesdna/ > makesdna: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/intern/atomic/atomic_ops.h:265: atomic_add_z: Assertion `sizeof(size_t) == 1 << 2' failed. > > Adding "|| defined(__alpha__)" to the test of arches in the patch > 0011-fix_FTBFS_on_unofficial_64bit_archs.patch results in a successful > build on alpha. Thanks for reporting. I'm on vacation now, but I'll fix this as soon as I can. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi | Debian Maintainer
Bug#752224: [blender] Some sources are not included in your package
Hi Bastien! On Jun 21, 2014 12:18 PM, "Bastien ROUCARIES" wrote: > > Package: src:blender > Version:2.70a-2 > > user: debian...@lists.debian.org > usertags: source-is-missing > severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org > > Hi, > > Your package seems to include some files that lack sources > in prefered forms of modification: > > release/scripts/addons/netrender/js/jquery-ui.js > > (you may use the packaged jquery-ui package. BTW you could may use > packaged jquery instead of your one). > > According to Debian Free Software Guidelines [1] (DFSG) #2: > "The program must include source code, and must allow distribution > in source code as well as compiled form.". > > This could also constitute a license violation for some copyleft > licenses such as the GNU GPL. > > In order to solve this problem, you could: > 1. repack the origin tarball adding the missing source to it. > 2 add the source files to "debian/missing-sources" directory > > Both way satisfies the requirement that we ship the source. Second option > might be preferable due to the following reasons [2]: > - Upstream can do it too and you could even supply a patch to them, > thus full filling our social contract [3], see particularly §2. > - If source and non-source are in different locations, ftpmasters may >miss the source and (needlessly) reject the package. > - The source isn't duplicated in every .diff.gz/.debian.tar.* (though >this only really matters for larger sources). > > You could also ask debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-qa for more > guidance. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html#guidelines > [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736873#8 > [3] https://www.debian.org/social_contract I was aware of this issue (reported as an error by lintian) but I uploaded the actual package anyway, waiting to find a possible and elegant solution to the problem. I already reached a similar target dropping the installation of another .js file provided in upstream tarball. At that time, I tried the same with jquery-ui.js but the trick didn't work. I'll try to solve this issue as soon as I've ended my holidays and I'll be back to keyboard. Thanks for reporting this officially. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi | Debian Maintainer
Bug#739194: blender: Segfaults at startup on armhf
Hi Gunnar! On 2014-03-16 at 04:33, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Forgot to comment about this for too long — Blender does /not/ run > either on armel. But it also fails to die — I left it (apparently) > running for over a full day, and it didn't seem to make anything. I didn't forget you... the simple answer is that I don't know how to fix this, if there's a fix ;-) Anyhow, given that it's a python-related issue (iirc), could you please test if v2.70 release (now in experimental) changes this still situation? I haven't uploaded it to unstable yet because of libav10 transition, but there are no additional b-deps to build it smoothly compared to v2.69. Let me know something about it; then I can contact some blender upstream devels to dig deeper into this issue, even if they are not so confident with ARM architecture right now ;-P Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#743701: Info received (Bug#743701: libva1=1.3.0-1 with i965 makes all video "solid black" with mpv --hwdec=vaapi)
Hi! On 2014-04-06 at 10:39, Kevin Mitchell wrote: > I have just discovered that > --vo=vaapi --hwdec=vaapi works as expected --vo=opengl --hwdec=vaapi > exhibits the broken behaviour described > > So it seems to be an opengl interop issue. The problem persists with > libva/i965-driver 1.3.1+ from git. I'll report this upstream. Thanks. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#749314: lintian: False positive: blender source: source-is-missing release/scripts/addons/netrender/js/jquery-ui.js
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.22.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, running lintian[1] against a new revision of blender, I got this error: = = = 8< = = = E: blender source: source-is-missing release/scripts/addons/netrender/js/jquery-ui.js N: N:The source of the following file is missing. Lintian checked a few N:possible paths to find the source, and do not find it. N: N:Please repack your package to include the source or add it to N:"debian/missing-sources" directory. N: N:If this is a false-positive, please report a bug against Lintian. N: N:Severity: serious, Certainty: possible N: N:Check: cruft, Type: source = = = 8< = = = but that file is in the source, as you can see at [2]. Hope this could help. Cheers. [1] http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/blender/2.70a-2/lintian [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/blender.git;a=tree;f=release/scripts/addons/netrender/js;h=fac33343b848286720da9f92b236892852ebf469;hb=f8ddf6dd14dba27a2d16189b3e0957c0ba558922 -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages lintian depends on: ii binutils 2.24.51.20140425-1 ii bzip2 1.0.6-5 ii diffstat 1.58-1 ii file 1:5.18-1 ii gettext0.18.3.2-1 ii hardening-includes 2.5 ii intltool-debian0.35.0+20060710.1 ii libapt-pkg-perl0.1.29+b1 ii libarchive-zip-perl1.37-2 ii libclass-accessor-perl 0.34-1 ii libclone-perl 0.37-1 ii libdpkg-perl 1.17.9 ii libemail-valid-perl1.193-1 ii libfile-basedir-perl 0.03-1 ii libipc-run-perl0.92-1 ii liblist-moreutils-perl 0.33-2 ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1 ii libtext-levenshtein-perl 0.09-1 ii libtimedate-perl 2.3000-2 ii liburi-perl1.60-1 ii man-db 2.6.7.1-1 ii patchutils 0.3.3-1 ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.18.2-4 ii t1utils1.37-2 Versions of packages lintian recommends: ii libautodie-perl 2.25-1 ii libperlio-gzip-perl 0.18-2 ii perl-modules [libautodie-perl] 5.18.2-4 Versions of packages lintian suggests: pn binutils-multiarch ii dpkg-dev 1.17.9 ii libhtml-parser-perl3.71-1+b1 ii libtext-template-perl 1.46-1 ii libyaml-perl 0.90-1 ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#749465: debian-maintainers: Annual ping for Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal Hi, this is my annual ping as Debian Maintainer. I'm still actively maintaining packages in Debian, as reported at [1]. So, please keep my key in the DM keyring. Cheers. [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mfv -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#751016: irssi: New upstream stable release 0.8.16 available!
Package: irssi Version: 0.8.16~rc1-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, on May 29th 2014 v0.8.16 has been released. Please, could you package it? ;-) Thanks in advance. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages irssi depends on: ii libc6 2.19-1 ii libglib2.0-02.40.0-3 ii libncurses5 5.9+20140118-1 ii libperl5.18 5.18.2-4 ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1h-1 ii libtinfo5 5.9+20140118-1 ii libval142.0-1.1 ii perl5.18.2-4 ii perl-base [perlapi-5.18.1] 5.18.2-4 irssi recommends no packages. Versions of packages irssi suggests: ii irssi-scripts 20131030 -- no debconf information -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#675236: gtkpod is not installable on my system
Hi! gtkpod 2.1.3 is in experimental suite. Could you please test it and tell me if the issue persists? Otherwise I could consider that bug was caused by a random factor and indeed close this bug report. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687988: blender: Fails to display solid objects with r600/gallium3D
Hi Roger! Since I can't reproduce this issue on my box, could you possibly test the actual version in experimental suite, based on 2.65a release? And please let me know if the issue still persists; otherwise, I'd like to close this bug report in next revision (almost ready to go). Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687988: blender: Fails to display solid objects with r600/gallium3D
reassign 687988 src:mesa 8.0.5-3 thanks Hi Roger! On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Sorry, I should have replied sooner. I did some more testing here on > Windows and Mac in addition to Linux, and couldn't reproduce it. It > turned out to be a bug in the Mesa software rendering--installing the > Radeon proprietary driver fixed things. For some reason my Radeon > HD6970 was defaulting to use software rendering with Xorg and there > was some other issue with the ati/radeon driver. OK. Good to know. ;-) > Whatever the cause here, it's definitely not a bug in blender, so I > would suggest reassigning it to Mesa. Doing it right now. Thanks for your efforts in sorting this out. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689380: fix
Hi!
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Wendy Elmer wrote:
> The problem is here:
>
> clarity_cover.c: In function 'clarity_cover_set_album_item':
>
> clarity_cover.c:244:9: error: format not a string literal and no format
> arguments [-Werror=format-security]
>
> I fixed the problem like this:
>
> gtkpod-2.1.2/plugins/clarity/clarity_cover.c
>
> // Set cover artwork
> gtk_clutter_texture_set_from_pixbuf (GTK_CLUTTER_TEXTURE(priv->texture),
> item->albumart, &error);
> if (error) {
> + g_warning("%s", error->message);
> - g_warning(error->message);
> g_error_free(error);
> return;
> }
>
> After the fix gtkpod compiled.
Feel free to contact upstream maintainer and provide him a patch
fixing this issue.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#689380: fix
Hi! On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Wendy Elmer wrote: > > I reported it upstream to the gtkpod dev mailing list. They have applied > and committed my patch. Good to know. I'll close this bug report with next revision (or version). Thanks. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692810: FTBFS with libav9, currently in debian/experimental
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > This bug might be fixed in the new upstream v2.64a. Can someone please > prepare the new version in git? I'd happy to testbuild and upload it > to experimental. Hi Reinhard! I've started working on 2.64a last week but then real life brought me back to my stuff ;-) I'll give it a look during next weekend and let you know about any progress in the upgrading. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692435: gegl: CVE-2012-4433
Hi Michael! On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue. Please see attached patch. Ahhh... thanks for taking care of this bug. Sorry for the eternal delay in my reply, but in this period I'm overwhelmed by real-life stuff ;-) I'll apply your NMU changes asap. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#685535: blender: Space Navigator support
severity 685535 wishlist thanks - Hi! On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Davide G. Borin wrote: > Blender has from some time support for ndof controllers, like > 3dconnexion Space Navigator, but it's not compiled in the Debian > version. Building the source with libspnav-dev installed fix the problem. Thanks for pointing this out. Since this is not a relevant issue, I downgraded severity to wishlist. I'll provide the new b-dep asap and upload the new revision to experimental suite. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652098: Segfault
Hi! On 11/01/2012 20:03, mateusz.ka...@gmail.com wrote: Blender 2.61-1 is segfaulting. Any progress in fixing this ? Segfault has been already double-reported in #654395 and #654431. A working revision is ready in the git repository and pending for next upload. We're waiting to fix #654428 before uploading this new revision. Thanks for your patience. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 1E9C4467 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#653270: gtkpod eats up all memory
Hi! On 17/01/2012 18:42, Harald Dunkel wrote: Sorry, I missed your EMail from Jan.6th. It happens. ;-) The problem is still there. After 5 minutes runtime scanning my music directory gtkpod used>3GByte memory: I've re-opened the bug. The new 2.1.1 release is ready for upload, waiting for my sponsor to validate it. Hope it'll be sooner than later. However, feel free to test the git repository snapshot to see if the issue remains in this new version. > [...] I think its obvious that there is some memory leak. ... that strangely appeared now! :-) I'll try to test this behaviour in some way. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 1E9C4467 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675236: gtkpod is not installable on my system
Any news on this issue? Does 2.1.2 from unstable suite fixes the problem? Let me know. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659361: [Pkg-gtkpod-devel] Bug#659361: Reverting of mp4/m4a support (please add back)
Hi!
On 10/02/2012 15:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
I have applied the attached patch to the gtkpod 2.1.1 Debian package
(please note that I added just another SONAME, because the libmp4v2
Debian package is already at 2), ran autoreconf and rebuilt it, all
without libmp4v2-dev installed. The m4a and mp4 plugins were built fine
and got installed into the resulting binary package:
$ dpkg -c ../gtkpod_2.1.1-1_i386.deb | egrep 'm4a|mp4'
-rw-r--r-- root/root 21108 2012-02-10 15:23
./usr/lib/gtkpod/libfiletype_m4a.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 20032 2012-02-10 15:23
./usr/lib/gtkpod/libfiletype_mp4.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 395 2012-02-10 15:23
./usr/lib/gtkpod/filetype_m4a.plugin
-rw-r--r-- root/root 400 2012-02-10 15:23
./usr/lib/gtkpod/filetype_mp4.plugin
I could install the gtkpod packages, start the application and
explicitely activate the plugins in the corresponding preferences menu.
I didn't test any further, though.
Please note that dh_shlibdeps gave warnings like "dpkg-shlibdeps:
warning: debian/gtkpod/usr/lib/gtkpod/libfiletype_m4a.so contains an
unresolvable reference to symbol dlopen: it's probably a plugin." for
both plugins, so maybe a line like "libfiletype_{m4a,mp4}_la_LIBADD =
-ldl" should get added to the appropriate Makefile.am files.
Hope that helps,
Fabian
Your efforts are really appreciated! :-)
I will test and apply your patch as soon as I find some free time. Maybe
in the weekend, already.
Once all the changes have been made and checked, I'll ask my sponsor to
upload the new revision.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Sponsored Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#654417: transition: glew
Hi! On 13/02/2012 11:33, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi, So it seems our binNMU did not help. Turns out at least pymol, avogadro, hugin and libsfml use "libglew1.5-dev", which libglew-dev does not provide. Could you add a provides for libglew1.5-dev? ~Niels An usually super-active Alessio already fixed it. I added the Provides field also for libglewmx1.5-dev, in case. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659856: mp4v2: Please bring back metadata API
Hi Fabian! On 14/02/2012 11:24, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi, it appears that between the latest official release 1.9.1 and the "recommended trunk snapshot" r479 that got packaged in Debian, upstream (for no apparent reason, if you are asking me) removed the entire metadata API from libmp4v2. However, some not-yet-ported software like e.g. faac does still rely on this API and does thus not build against the current package. It seems this is the same reason why d-m.o still has a version 1.9.1 package in their repository. However, I think reverting the corresponding upstream SVN commit and thus adding this API back does not hurt anyone and hereby ask you to do so. The attached patch is the reverted upstream commit r322 forced to apply to the current sources. I've tested your patch and sadly I've got to admit that it fails[1] :-( Since the patch modifies the upstream source code, I had to re-pack it, as you can see from the updated name of the package (~dfsg1). Feel free to help me investigating the issue and maybe solve it ;-) Cheers. mfv [1] http://debomatic64.debian.net/unstable/pool/mp4v2_1.9.1+svn479~dfsg1-1/mp4v2_1.9.1+svn479~dfsg1-1.buildlog -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659856: mp4v2: Please bring back metadata API
On 14/02/2012 17:25, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 14.02.2012 16:48, schrieb Matteo F. Vescovi:
I've tested your patch and sadly I've got to admit that it fails[1] :-(
Okay, I haven't yet tried it myself, it should just serve as a starting
point. Maybe some other commit needs to get reverted as well.
Ah, OK.
Since the patch modifies the upstream source code, I had to re-pack
it, as you can see from the updated name of the package (~dfsg1).
He, what else do you expect a patch to do?! Drop it in debian/patches
and be done with it, or am I missing something?
If you change the upstream code, adding a file (like your patch does),
dpkg-source ain't happy at all, because it finds discrepancies between
the .orig.tar.{gz|bzip2} (created using pristine-tar from the clean
upstream branch) and the upstream modified with the patch. No good. The
only way is to re-pack the upstream source tree with the patch applied.
But maybe I'm doing it wrong.
Cheers,
- Fabian
Cheers.
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Sponsored Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659856: mp4v2: Please bring back metadata API
On 14/02/2012 17:38, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: But maybe I'm doing it wrong. Exactly, I was ;-) I missed something with the debian/changelog or something... sorry for the noise. But the package won't build anyway. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679514: libbabl-dev: Compilation failure due to incomplete type
Hi! On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > > It appears that the babl-classes.h header file, which defines union _Babl, > does > not get installed by the upstream babl/Makefile.am. However, this header file > references a pile of other apparently internal header files so I'm not sure > whether it should be installed. I explained the issue to upstream and they replied me that in this case you should use babl_format_get_bytes_per_pixel () function instead. Could that help? Thanks for your info about this problem. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#541170: babl: New upstream version available - 0.1.0
Hi! I'm taking control over babl (and gegl) library because the actual maintainer has lost interest in it and gave me his blessing for starting a new work on it again. Now, I'm already started working on the new 0.1.x series (importing all the 0.1.x stable releases in an experimental branch) and most of the changes Daniel made with his patch set were already made by me (I didn't know he had done so much work!) and now are in the git repository. But he did some tweaks I didn't think of... so I'm gonna apply few of them ;-) Thanks Daniel for the huge work! Hope to give you some feedback very soon. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#654395: blender: No such file or directory
Hi! On 31/01/2012 08:39, Andreas Fleckl wrote: the big change for me in 2.61 would be cycles but the user preferences telling me that the script files are missing should i open a bug report? Ah... We'll investigate on it... soon ;-) However, feel free to file a bug report. Thanks for your feedback. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#493862: blender: tiling WM startup error
Hi! Any change about this bug? Should I close it? Thanks. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#657886: gegl: diff for NMU version 0.0.22-2.1
Package: gegl Version: 0.0.22-2 Hi! A gegl 0.0.22-3 revision is ready for upload. Jordi Mallach (Cc:) offered to sponsor me. Ross Burton gave me control over gegl and babl libraries. I've almost completed the upgrading work on them. 0.1.x versions are in experimental branches on collab-maint, waiting for testing. Thanks for your patience and time. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#653270: gtkpod eats up all memory
Harald, gtkpod 2.1.1-1 is out now. Could you test it and tell me if it fixes this issue? Thanks. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#653270: gtkpod eats up all memory
Hi! On 06/02/2012 19:23, Harald Dunkel wrote: The new version died immediately, when I tried to add my music folder: > [...] Gosh, it's even worst than before! :-( Gotta investigate on this. Thanks for your quick feedback. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer e-mail: mfv.deb...@gmail.com GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#657886: closed by "Matteo F. Vescovi" (Re: gegl: diff for NMU version 0.0.22-2.1)
On 06/02/2012 19:45, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 17:33:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Uploaded. Closing. Err, what? You're supposed to close this in the next maintainer upload, when acking the nmu... Right. Sorry. Reopened and it will be closed with next upload. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658075: blender: cycles addon "missing script files"
Hi! Finally, I managed to have Cycles support working correctly in Blender. I'm about uploading a test-build to experimental suite to allow users testing it and give us some feedback about how it works (if it's stable, etc etc). Thanks for your patience. Cheers! -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#682084: ITP: totalopenstation -- download and process data from total station devices
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name: totalopenstation Version : 0.3 Upstream Author : Stefano Costa * URL : http://tops.iosa.it/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : download and process data from total station devices Total Open Station (TOPS for friends) is a free software program for downloading and processing data from total station devices. This is a task which is usually done by proprietary, dedicated and Windows™-only software, but TOPS is different by nature, because: - it is free software released under the GNU GPLv3 license; - it works on any operating system, including mobile platforms like OpenMoko; - it is designed to support as many devices and formats as possible, all within the same program, opposed to having one program per device. Every model has its own quirks, but TOPS uses a modular structure and keeps the downloading of data logically separated from its processing, thus enabling exporting data to a variety of output formats, even at a later moment. Archiving of raw data is made easy by using plain text files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#686259: yafaray: yafaray blender addon can not be enabled
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >> Recommends (Version) | Installed >> =-+-=== >> blender (>= 2.59) | 2.63a-2 OK, discovered the issue: I updated the yafaray-exporter dependency for blender (>= 2.63a-2), but forgot to do the same on yafaray... and thought I could have fixed it with upcoming 2.64 version upload. I guess I should fix it anyway with a middle upload to prevent future bug reports about it. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#653270: gtkpod eats up all memory
Hi! Could you please test if actual freezed version (2.1.2-1) has started working well backi again? Thanks for your info. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675236: gtkpod is not installable on my system
Hi! Marco Guidetti wrote: > Hi Matteo, > as of now for me the situation hasn't changed. I still can't install > gtkpod due to the same problem. (I tried with sources and it went > rather smooth) > I think the best way to deal with this is for me to install a virtual > machine from scratch and retrace my steps and see where the problem > begins. > Right now I don't have time to do this, but as soon as I have some > time, I will do it. Any news about this issue? I'd ask you to post here the output of following command: apt-cache policy gtkpod so that I can understand where you're getting the packages and their priorities. Thanks. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683042: debian/copyright: No information of embedded external libraries
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:27 AM, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: > debian/copyright doesn't include the copyright information of the > external libraries such as libmv, Eigen3, and Bullet Physics which > are included in orig.tar.bz2 file and will be statically linked. > > Also, there are some codes partially imported from external projects. > For example, functions for detecting a pen tablet device were copied > from Wine 1.1.13 (See intern/ghost/intern/GHOST_WindowX11.cpp). I'm quite busy with my work in this period. So, since this task is easy enough for everyone, patches fixing this issue are really appreciated. I'll review them once I'll find a minute for it and eventually I'll apply them if they sound good to me. Thanks for your help Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683042: debian/copyright: No information of embedded external libraries
Hi again! On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:27:04AM +0900, IRIE Shinsuke wrote: > debian/copyright doesn't include the copyright information of the > external libraries such as libmv, Eigen3, and Bullet Physics which > are included in orig.tar.bz2 file and will be statically linked. I never gave a look at the debian/copyright file in the past, thinking it was ok. But I just discovered it's completely wrong! :-( I'm gonna re-work it all with correct copyright and licenses as soon as I find some spare time to work on it. Hopefully, before the release of 2.64 version package. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers! -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645972: Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)
Hi! On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:53:34AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > after doing some finger warming up in the morning and basically > duplicating the work inside the pkg-phototools repository[1] (my > fault to forget to check WNPP) I noticed that the packaging looks > quite ready for upload. > > Matteo, any reason to use experimental as target distribution. Release Team's advice "During freeze, please upload to experimental if the upload is not intended to fix RC bugs" is quite clear to me. > I'd suggest the following changes: > > changelog: s/experimental/unstable/ Already explained my point about that; however, feel free to "force" me to change it ;-) > control: > s/Priority: extra/Priority: optional/ Could you possibly point me to a specific Debian Policy Manual paragraph for this change? Just to know why I'm doing this and if it's correct. > add myself to Uploaders If this would ease the upload, ok. Cheers! -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645972: package name considerations
Hi! On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > Using "entangle" as a package name would be very generic and likely to > eventually conflict with other packages so I would suggest using > something like "entangle-photo" just like the homepage does. The homepage does, but the source package is called "entangle". The package renaming would force me to rename the source name anytime a new version get released. And it's annoying... really. > This package would definitely > > Enhances: GNUmed, GIMP, digikam That sounds good to me. I'll add that asap. > As the author of gnumed(-client/-server) I would even set it as > > Suggests: entangle-photo I tried to prompt "apt-cache search entangle" and I got 5 entries completely unrelated to photo stuff. A good description would help a lot in gathering the right information about the use of the package, not only the name. So, please don't ask to change the name of the package if it's not really necessary. > Thanks, > Karsten Cheers! -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645972: Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)
Hi Andreas! On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, that's for packages which are just in testing and if these needs > an update with minimal changes it is bad to have some higher version "in > between" in unstable. This is not the case for new packages so the > advise does not apply here. OK, that's convincing enough for me ;-) Changing it right now. > > Already explained my point about that; however, feel free to "force" me > > to change it ;-) > Hoping to be able to convince rather than force. ;-) ;-) > > Could you possibly point me to a specific Debian Policy Manual paragraph > > for this change? Just to know why I'm doing this and if it's correct. > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities > > I do not see any conflicts to other packages. Moreover Debian Med policy > document gives another reason: > > http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html: > >Packages of priority “extra” are excluded from some QA tests. > > This is nothing what we want! We want QA tests! OK. Doing that too. > > > add myself to Uploaders > > > > If this would ease the upload, ok. > > This is irrelevant for the actual upload because the changelog entry is > relevant for "who has uploaded this package" and I would leave this > untouched to honor your work on this. I just tend to put myself into > Uploaders to express the fact that I have some interest in the package > (which was finally triggered by the request on the Debian Med list). OK, I must admit this was the first commit I made after your interest in the package ;-) Thanks for helping me having entangle in Debian! Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687612: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#687612: FTBFS: openimageio: 64-bit atomics not in gcc-4.6 for some arches, builds ok with gcc-4.7
Hi! On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > The package FTBFS on many arches (arm*, mips*, powerpc and sparc) due > to missing 64-bit atomics support in gcc-4.6. The package builds fine > so you might consider changing that in build-depends or reassigning > the bug to gcc-4.6, but I understand that 64-bit atomics support for > these arches might not be backported to 4.6 soon. It's up to you and > the gcc maintainers but I had to report it. Probably the easier way at this point is to bump b-deps to gcc-4.7, since gcc-4.6 backporting would take too long. I'll provide a fixing revision sooner than later and ask my sponsor to upload it to the correct suite (maybe unblocking wheezy freeze?). Thanks for reporting :-) Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687612: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#687612: Bug#687612: FTBFS: openimageio: 64-bit atomics not in gcc-4.6 for some arches, builds ok with gcc-4.7
[Previously sent to David only, by mistake] On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, David Bremner wrote: > Note that gcc 4.7 is not available for all release architectures. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.7&suite=wheezy Am I missing something? Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694879: blender: Blender 2.63a-1 is missing Collada import/export support
Hi Sebastian! On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 05:26:41PM +0100, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: > I have attempted to import a Collada-file (.dae) into Blender packaged for > Debian/testing. Unfortunately Collada is not present in the import menu, and > not under User preferences > Addons > Import/Export either (if so I would > be able to enable it). Yep, knew about that. No one ever asked for the Collada support, since now ;-) > I downloaded Debian's source package for Blender and discovered in > CMakeLists.txt that Colldada is actively disabled there becuase OpenCollada > has not been packaged for Debian. So basically I guess I'm wishing for it > to be packaged and for Debian Blender package to enable use of it. :) Exactly. The better solution would be to file a RFP (Request For Package) bug, asking for (Open)Collada to be packaged, so we could integrate it in Blender, being a library thing to be set. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#695342: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#695342: Uses wrong location for gobject-introspection files
Hi Michael! Glad to see you again ;-) On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > entangle provides gobject introspection files and installs them into the > system paths. > > /usr/share/gir-1.0/Entangle-0.1.gir > /usr/lib//girepository-1.0/Entangle-0.1.typelib > > If those gi files are really meant to be system-wide, they should be > split up into a -dev and gir1.2- package according to the gi mini policy > [2]. Please also not that gobject-introspection does not yet support > multi-arch paths so the typelib files need to be moved (manually) to > /usr/lib/girepository-1.0 for now [1]. OK, I'll try to find some spare time to work on this issue asap. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#706672: debian-maintainers: Annual ping for Matteo F. Vescovi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal Hi, this is my annual ping as Debian Maintainer. I'm still actively maintaining packages in Debian, as reported at [1]. So, please keep my key in the DM keyring. Cheers. [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mfv - -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Debian powered! iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRg2/NAAoJEIBiOYmDss96kbEQAOWz4Il2cbfzIQDy4ey77boG EQ7JNXKPl8QAhEyCiylTjTM77niKb25kw0vCGO9VLQAXN37Zva92af1McB/1bTJW 19Ch8BgmHdmopjtCj1qBzGFBLGgNa5PU5saxqRnQSh3C+Rg/Yw0KG8vbsmLhe/ac 7AMmsSmA0cMtLsOPA1ekk5z1Hd3+vrBwFJC1MA6JB6er8rDo9Xp6dYqlOIHQtt0l ipHniYoayxI1SftYtr5oTlsJ+Vqupe/7Xtl22FCwy5ykW6SahzWo1g8YTpKYrF51 amabjrnDYUkC850n2uZLWZG9joKqYKjRQPVde4XVYoyBka+sejNZoYvWVThaQzM1 glEVFAuYfOnhSCmV39Q2pNWdLnb5Uiz8+trm2R1Ezi0rZEdBAWnmukIn34U+5U8d Vf7ZRrJH99Uomcl0fmghegDcznlav3S/1/qNRS2xsaujgZjCIRNzEbPXl0+1BmtB D61hTB7CWZQuSbyyTAQMD0/dOR0bOBb4YaObVbR0B5fci51sSiF4eQBTUH1Bebjf /hcK6+WiTJ4pM7f4PEXmNSGa+umAkuoauzhfrYX2/N/7KIOV90SyUd/x9Yrk3QA4 1A4r4N7I8mVF0YKME4FSqHYHszYHu3uBHwguphUFBAHopDe1/hzy39ImFxCWEfpi CmBbEeWZKAxB7PtC1G7y =Ceqk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#476284: Bullet Physics Library
Hi Markus! On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:11:32AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > I'm mostly interested in what the Blender maintainers think about Bullet > as a shared library, hence the CC to Matteo, and i would like to know > more about your needs with respect to Bullet. Can you imagine that a > shared library can replace the embedded version in Blender? Do you > prefer Bullet with just the core libraries or can you make use of all > the extra libs, too? Well, Bullet is a bad beast for Blender... ;-) I recall the fights Diego Petteno' (Blender packager for Gentoo) had to face while trying to integrate a shared version of bullet library instead of the embedded one :-) I'd be happy to test the use of the shared version of it in the Debian package, being its absence from archives the only issue at the moment. It would be great even to use the entire pack of libraries, not only the core one. Let me know if you need some help in shaping the package, if I'm able to ;-P IIRC, some DDs of Games Team are also part of DMM Team. Maybe you could find a sponsor here, directly. Thanks for your efforts in improving Blender and Debian! Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#687988: Processed: Re: Bug#687988: blender: Fails to display solid objects with r600/gallium3D
Hi again! On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > The difference is the bug report's history is not in my inbox, and if I > have to go read the whole bug log it's never going to happen; if > somebody who already did that (or enough of it to reassign to my > package) can explain their reasoning and summarise the bug in a mail > that gets to me, things become much easier. Right, I completely agree. So, this is what happened: Rober Leigh (rleigh) reported that in version 2.63a-1 of blender package there was a problem in visualizing solid objects (they disappear), while wireframe objects were displayed perfectly. At first it seemed to be a blender-related issue, while testing different solutions Roger came to the conclusion that the problem resides in MESA rendering drivers (at least for his ATI Readeon HD6870). He reported Windows, Mac and Linux boxes were tested on different applications using OpenGL and the issue could not be reproduced. Only using the software rendering option from Xorg brought to this situation. While the proprietary driver didn't show any problem. And then Roger told me (being the only active maintainer) that probably at this point the better solution would have been to reassign the bug to MESA package. This is a brief history of the bug. Hope it's clear enough. Thanks for educating me about these procedures ;-) Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#692381: yafaray: FTBFS against python3.3
Hi Dmitrijs! Sad to be said, but I've tested your patch and it fails to recognize python3.3 in Debian; so it builds fine... but keeps using python3.2 ;-( I need to investigate further on this issue. Anyhow, thanks for your efforts in solving this problem. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#668380: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#668380: closed by "Matteo F. Vescovi" (Re: /usr/bin/iv: "iv" image viewer shows only black in window...)
Hi! On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > Any suggestions what to do about this? On my home system, iv displays > a translucent window, and then causes the X server to hang (however I > can switch to a console and kill the iv process, which restores > operation). > > I don't know exactly where the bug is, but there's clearly a bug... >< Sincerely? I don't know. Sorry. This is clearly an upstream bug but upstream maintainer considers it not a bug. My role here is only to package the source, not develop/fix it. Please, refer to Larry and friends for that part of the work. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688157: closed by "Matteo F. Vescovi" (Re: makefile script does not consider the standard dpkg build flags)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:39:50AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > this also affects HARDENING so must be revised... > > all FLAGS mus be manage by dpkg-buildflags!! OK. Patches are really welcome. Feel free to provide yours. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#688157: closed by "Matteo F. Vescovi" (Re: makefile script does not consider the standard dpkg build flags)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:52:17AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > [...] due i'm very busy... Well, same here ;-P Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700676: ITP: opencolorio -- complete color management solution
Hi Marcus! FYI, OpenColorIO package is almost ready for upload. Once I've found a sponsor for it, it will be uploaded to experimental suite and I'll provide a new updated revision of blender enabling it. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702420: blender: 2.66-2 fails to configure, errors when bytecompiling some addons
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > the new blender 2.66-2 from experimental does not configure correctly, it > looks like it fails when bytecompiling some python addons. Blender 2.66a-1 is on its way to be uploaded and should fix this issue. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630414: gtkpod silently crashes every time on exit
Package: gtkpod Version: 2.0.1-1 Hi Etienne! Could you test if mounting the device on a /media sub-directory solves the issue? The new policy for the program is that the mount point should be under that directory. I've already contacted the upstream maintainer and we'll try to figure it out. Let me know any evolution. Thanks. -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#630414: gtkpod silently crashes every time on exit
Package: gtkpod Version: 2.0.1-1 Once you've tested the "mount point" solution and it doesn't help, could you possibly get the debug symbols, run them through valgrind and attach the output? That would really help a lot. Thanks for your time. mfv -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637815: gtkpod fails to start
Package: gtkpod Version: 2.1.0~git20110604.c707594-3 Hi! I must admit that I can't reproduce this bug... nor when I tried the version you're using, nor the one in unstable (that is the new stable release). But I'm using Sid. The first possible cause of this issue that comes to my mind could be the GTK3 migration going on from unstable to testing: for example, libgtk-3-0 in testing is up to 3.0.11-1 version, while in unstable it's 3.0.12-1 but it's not going to migrate soon[1]. So the issue is not directly connected to gtkpod. It's an environment problem; anyhow, you could dare and upgrade the needed packages from unstable to test if it works (and even test the new 2.1.0-1). Otherwise, you have to wait the migration process to complete ;-) Thanks for your patience. mfv [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+3.0.html -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637815: gtkpod fails to start
tags 637815 pending thanks --- So, I talked to upstream maintainer and he said that this issue should have been fixed in current 2.1.0 release, the one in unstable distribution. So I'm tagging this bug report as pending, since once the migration from unstable will be completed the issue shouldn't be present anymore. At that point, you should be so kind to report here if the issue still remains. If it doesn't, feel free to close this bug report or let me know to do so. Thanks for your contribution to Debian! mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637987: libgtkpod1 depends on libanjuta0, not libanjuta-3-0
Package: libgtkpod1 Version: 2.1.0~git20110604.c707594-3 Hi! That's what your system says, not what Debian says: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libgtkpod1 where the first dependency is correctly pointing to libanjuta-3-0. And there are no other deps about anjuta. Sincerely I've tested the package quite well and never found issues about unmet dependencies... but we're not perfect ;-) Please, try to completely remove the package (gtkpod, gtkpod-data and libgtkpod1), sync the repositories (to get rid of old libs lost in GTK3 transition) and then re-install it (even though you probably already did so). I guess I'd need some more info to understand the problem. Thanks for your patience. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637815: gtkpod fails to start
Package: gtkpod Version: 2.1.0~git20110604.c707594-3 Hi! Now that gtkpod 2.1.0-1 has migrated (almost) to testing distribution, could you kindly test if the issue still remains? Thanks. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#637987: [Pkg-gtkpod-devel] Bug#637987: libgtkpod1 depends on libanjuta0, not libanjuta-3-0
On 18/08/2011 13:55, Steffen Grunewald wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 05:35:05PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: On 16/08/2011 12:39, Steffen Grunewald wrote: The package page reports libgtkpod1 would depend on libanjuta-3-0 (which is already installed). So I guess I found the problem: are you using debian-multimedia repositories? Admit it! :-) I admit... but still somehow, in its infinite wisdom, aptitude managed to resolve the problem (and install the 2.1.0~ packages). Today, when running an "apt-get upgrade", I was stuck again. Commenting out the multimedia line resolved the issue. No magic about the infinite wisdom of aptitude: simply, Christian Marillat now provides a 2.1.0 release of gtkpod. And it just upgraded to it, I guess ;-) But I'm not using (and never will) d-m repos. Sorry. Marillat bumped the epoch for libgtkpod1 and probably the apt-pinning in your repositories gives priority to Debian-Multimedia one. I"m still curious why (and how this could be resolved)... Well, for the "why" part you might ask Marillat directly; for the "how" part, it could be resolved through apt pinning[1], as already said. Besides that, this is not a real bug against libgtkpod1; so I'm gonna close this bug report. Anyhow, feel free to reopen it if you find that my solution about repositories doesn't work. Thanks for your efforts. Climbing back into my little hole now, Steffen No problem. Happy hacking. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/AptPreferences -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564119: ITA/ITP: yafray -- a modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system
retitle 564119 ITA/ITP: yafaray -- a modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system owner 564119 ! thanks - Hi! I'm adopting yafray... well, adopting it even if it's a dead project and attempting to package its descendent, yafaray. Already done some work on it. At present time, it's still under heavy development but once the 0.1.2 version (that is compatible with current Blender version in unstable and testing) I'll work harder to package it fast. Already talked to Blender maintainer... we're gonna collaborate on the integration of the two packages. I really hope we could do a good job. Anyway, any help or hint would be really appreciated. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#564119: ITA: yafray -- a modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based
--- Short note: --- So... yafray is a dead package... and a dead upstream project too. From its ashes, the yafaray project was born. No reason for a ITP, indeed. I'm gonna open a new ITP bug report against wnpp to start the packaging of yafaray. Once I've obtained the new ITP bug number, I'm gonna close this bug report since it has no reason to remain open. Happy hacking. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#502373: yafray is EOL, yafaray will replace
owner 502373 ! thanks - Hi! I've been working on yafaray for few weeks now. Once the new release (0.1.2) is considered stable by upstream (it should be sooner than later), I'll package it as fast as I can and upload it up unstable, if a sponsor does that for me ;-) Thanks for any kind of support. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638653: ITP: yafaray -- free open-source raytracing engine
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name : yafaray Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Authors : Bert Buchholz Michele Castigliego Rodrigo Placencia Vázquez * URL : http://www.yafaray.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang : Python, mostly Description : free open-source raytracing engine YafaRay is the result of rewriting the YafRay source code from scratch. Mathias Wein started to work on the new engine in December 2005. As a result of the rewriting and to make people aware that it was actually a completely new engine, the YafRay name was changed into YafaRay. Nobody knows for sure what the added 'a' stands for. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638653: ITP: yafaray -- free open-source raytracing engine
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:02:38PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 20 ao??t 2011 ?? 17:42 +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi a ??crit : > > Description : free open-source raytracing engine > > "free" and "open-source" are implied by the fact some software is > included in main. OK, but it sounded like a problem... is it? ;-) > > YafaRay is the result of rewriting the YafRay source code from scratch. > > Mathias Wein started to work on the new engine in December 2005. > > As a result of the rewriting and to make people aware that it was > > actually a completely new engine, the YafRay name was changed into > > YafaRay. Nobody knows for sure what the added 'a' stands for. > > The description is unsuitable for the package itself. It should explain > what the software is for, rather than its history. Right. I'll provide it when the package will compile and build correctly and at present time it doesn't. Maybe I'll give up the ITP before needing a what-it-does description. > BTW, can it/will it replace other ray-tracing packages in Debian? AFAIK, it won't replace anything of its kind. It'll only provide an good alternative to Blender render engine, at the moment. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#644386: Typos in package description
tags 644386 pending thanks - Hi Erik! Thanks for your report and patch; I've just applied it and pushed to git repository for chromium. So I'm tagging this bug as pending. Thank you for your contribution to Debian! mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641085: blender: new upstream release 2.5.9
Package: blender Severity: wishlist Hi Kevin! The new stable upstream release 2.59 is out! Please, update the package :-) Thanks in advance. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641099: chromium-browser: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
tag 641099 pending thanks --- Package: chromium-browser Followup-For: Bug #641099 Hi Bill! I've just corrected this issue in the git repository, so I'm tagging this bug as pending. Thanks for your help. mfv -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#552705: ITP: mp4v2 -- a library that provides functions to read, eate, and modify mp4 files
Hi! I'm the actual maintainer for the gtkpod package. I'm gonna take care of this package because many people are asking me to provide the mp4 support in the gtkpod package actually present in Debian Testing and Unstable archives. Reading [1], it seems like MPL is a license suitable for Debian "main" archive. I've already been accepted as member of the Debian Multimedia Team and I'm gonna work as much as I can on the packaging process of this library. Thanks a lot for your eventual help with it. mfv [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Mozilla_Public_License_.28MPL.29 -- Ing. Matteo F. Vescovi -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638653: ITP: yafaray -- modern xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name : yafaray Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Authors : Bert Buchholz Michele Castigliego Rodrigo Placencia Vázquez * URL : http://www.yafaray.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang : C++ and Python, mostly Description : modern xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system Description: modern, xml-speaking raytracing-based rendering system Yafaray is an advanced raytracing rendering system with many modern features including full radiosity and High Dynamic Range Imaging (HDRI) for scene lighting. It reads a simple XML-based scene definition file and can be used as a renderer for Blender (version 2.5 and above). -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641364: ITP: yafaray-blender2.5-exporter -- YafaRay Exporter for Blender 2.5x
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" Hi! YafaRay Project (former yafray, now dead) consists of two parts: + Core software, doing the heavy-duty work (ITP #638653); + Exporter software, that creates a interface between the modeler (in this case, Blender) and the raytracing engine. I've already worked a lot on the first one and going to look for a sponsor (I'm still a sponsored maintainer). Its packaging is ready, even if the software is not considered stable yet by upstream authors. Now I'm working on the exporter and it's easy, since it consists in few python files to be copied as addons for Blender. * Package name: yafaray-blender2.5-exporter Version : 0.1.2~beta2 Upstream Author : Bert Buchholz Michele Castigliego Rodrigo Placencia Vázquez * URL : http://www.yafaray.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Python Description : YafaRay Exporter for Blender 2.5x YafaRay Exporter for Blender 2.5 allows exporting a Blender 3D model in a way that YafaRay rendering engine can understand and work on it to provide a good rendering alternative besides the Blender (and others) one. -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#641364: ITP: yafaray-blender2.5-exporter -- YafaRay Exporter for Blender 2.5x
FYI, currently only __init__.py file is covered by GPL-2+ license. I've asked upstream[1] to provide a full license coverage for the source tree, maybe keeping the use of GPL-2+ for all the files in the package. I really hope to get some response soon, since the debian packaging is ready for the upload. mfv [1] http://www.yafaray.org/node/492 -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#634069: ITA: glew -- OpenGL Extension Wrangler
Hi! I'm adopting this package right now. Is there anyone else that could help me avoiding messing up the 51 rdeps? ;-) Thanks. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#634069: ITA: glew -- OpenGL Extension Wrangler
Hi Fabrizio! On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:05:28AM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > Hi Matteo, > > are you interested in co-maintaining this package? Yep, that would be great... thanks a lot ;-) Happy hacking. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#642666: gtkpod: FTBFS: itdb.h
reassign 642666 libgpod-dev 0.8.2-3 affects 642666 gtkpod thanks - Package: libgpod-dev Version: 0.8.2-3 Severity: Serious [Michael Biebl found the problem. Thanks a lot, Michael!] To find what's wrong with the building process: cat /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libgpod-1.0.pc | grep imobile and it references libimobiledevice-1.0, as you can see. So, libgpod-dev needs to depend on libimobiledevice-dev for one, otherwise pkg-config can not resolve the CFLAGS/LIBS for libgpod. The dependencies of libgpod-dev look incorrect. It depends on libglib2.0-dev and libgtk2.0-dev, but the .pc file has: glib-2.0 >= 2.8.0 gobject-2.0 gdk-pixbuf-2.0 libimobiledevice-1.0 which would be something like: Depends: libglib2.0-dev, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev, libimobiledevice-dev either the .pc file is incorrect or the package dependencies. HTH. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#378801: not obvious how to delete a playlist without selecting from two menus
This issue has been corrected in upstream. This bug report will be closed with next stable release of gtkpod. Thanks a lot for your contribution to Debian. mfv -- Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' risultato non infetto. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#471076: inkscape: tutorialare installed making a MASSIVE package not possible to install on low-disk-space machines
Hi! On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:51:45PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > inkscape comes with 19mbytes of utterly irrelevant multi-language > tutorials, shoved into one directory, non-optionally. > > it is essential that these be added as a separate _optional_ package, > inkscape-docs or inkscape-tutorials. > > i have very limited space on an 8gb CF card i am using as a _main_ > hard drive (it's very, very fast - 0.5ms seek time) > > i therefore represent something approximating an "embedded" system > rather than a "desktop", although i am running a 2ghz CPU with 1Gb RAM. > > i cannot therefore afford to have unecessary disk space "wasted"... > > ... but it is impossible to install this package - at all - without > going through some extremely risky procedures... > > ... or, getting the source (on another machine), editing debian/control > etc. etc. and basically doing what should have been done in the first > place: removing the tutorials fom the inkscape program. This is one of the things on my TODO list about inkscape. Probably not with the upcoming upload to unstable (that should happen during next weekend) but soon enough I'm about splitting the monolithic inkscape package in two or more related packages and tutorials is one of them. Others could be documentation and data placed under /usr/share directory, streamlining the installation process and its dependencies. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700676: ubuntu
tags 700676 + help thanks Hi! On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:22:37PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > package now in ubuntu based off Marcus Watts's packagae with some fixes > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencolorio > > * Build with --with python2 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-phototools/opencolorio.git;a=commit;h=7c6e8c47354160593af8bff6f8b2146997745cd1 > * Add build-depends on libxi-dev and libxmu-dev Any particolar benefit from adding these b-deps? Any new feature? > * Set -DOCIO_BUILD_DOCS:BOOL=OFF to avoid compile failures > * Rebuild tar without ext/ and src/mari/ directory for licence simplicity Well, the approach of removing the stuff that blocks the compile process is not considered the optimal direction for any distribution. It's like avoiding the problem, in the end. And here we're talking of documentation; people need documentation! I'm spending time (lots of it) trying to modify the upstream source thru patches to use libraries already included in Debian. That's why things are not changing in this period. Help is really appreciated (tagging now). > * Complete debian/copyright Good to know. Thanks. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#718532: [Pkg-gtkpod-devel] Bug#718532: FBTFS with new Anjuta/GDL
Hi Michael! On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:03:10AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Matteo, > > due to the update of anjuta and gdl, the package now FTBFS [1]. > Attached is a debdiff (patches pulled from the Ubuntu package) to fix > the build failures. You just have to update the changelog accordingly. > > Would be great if you can prepare a new release. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Cheers, > Michael I already noticed it these days, trying to update some minor changes in the source package (e.g., unversioning anjuta and libgpod b-deps). Working on a new revision right now. Hope to fix it soon, maybe later today. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#718580: ITP: mayan -- Django-based Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" * Package name: mayan Version : 0.13.1 Upstream Author : Roberto Rosario * URL : http://www.mayan-edms.com/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : Django-based Electronic Document Management System (EDMS) Open-source, Django-based document management system with custom metadata indexing, file serving integration, tagging, digital signature verification, text parsing and OCR capabilities. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720181: libmatroska-dev: New upstream release 1.4.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:39:52PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Package: libmatroska-dev > Version: 1.3.0-2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > 1.4.0 has been releaed the 19 march 2013 and still not in unstable. SONAME bump = transition needed. Planning that, sooner or later. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720182: libebml-dev: New upstream release 1.3.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:42:20PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Package: libebml-dev > Version: 1.2.2-2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > embl 1.3.0 has been released the 19 march 2013 and still not in unstable. SONAME bump = transition needed. Planning that, sooner or later. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720181: libmatroska-dev: New upstream release 1.4.0
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:05:30PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Shouldn't be too hard, only one package depends on libmatroska5 : > [...] Never said it's hard, but surely it takes some time and probably I don't have enough of it right now. Sorry. Feel free to help on this if you urge this particular package (and libebml too, it seems). Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#720592: transition: libebml
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for the transition of libebml package. A testing-purpose package (1.3.0-1) is available on experimental since June 30th. Against this version, affiliated libmatroska 1.4.0 was built and even that package is in the experimental archive. The reverse dependencies in unstable for this transition are: * libmatroska * mkvtoolnix and none of them seems to FTBFS against this new library version, as can be seen at [1],[2]. Thanks for your time and patience. [1] http://debomatic64.debian.net/experimental/pool/libmatroska_1.3.0-2/libmatroska_1.3.0-2.buildlog [2] http://debomatic64.debian.net/experimental/pool/mkvtoolnix_6.3.0-1/mkvtoolnix_6.3.0-1.buildlog Ben file: title = "libebml"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libebml3" | .depends ~ "libebml4"; is_good = .depends ~ "libebml4"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libebml3"; -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721001: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#721001: [openimageio-tools] Add support for users OCIO config
Hi! On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Jed Frechette wrote: > Now that OpenColorIO is in Debian it would be good to have OpenImageIO > compiled with OpenColorIO support > > Currently oiiotool ignores the user's OCIO configuration and only displays > the default color spaces that ship with OpenImageIO tools. > I'm waiting to fix OCIO building on kFreeBSD arches since they fail at the moment as you can see at [1]. There's already a patch available but I need to check it and test against future releases of upstream code. It's kind of a simple task but my laptop died few days, so I'm resurrecting it right now and when it's up and ready, I'll upload the fixing revision and eventually provide a new revision of OIIO package with OCIO support enabled. Cheers. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opencolorio -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
Bug#725225: Can not detect BPM or beat
Hi! On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 10:50:19AM +0900, Takeshi Soejima wrote: > When loading a now sound file to a deck, the mixxx can not detect BPM or > beat. And no beat analyser can be seen in Beat Detection Preferences. http://mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/troubleshooting#the_bpm_detection_is_wrong Any similarity? -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725225: Can not detect BPM or beat
Hi! On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 09:24:28PM +0900, Takeshi Soejima wrote: > > Any similarity? > > Not a wrong detection as written, but completely no detection. > > On my wheezy machine, I have installed the package for ubuntu from the > official mixxx site (1.11.0-bzr3863-ppa1~oneiric1), and works fine. > > So I compare it and this sid package (1.11.0~dfsg-1), then notice > missing libraries. Coping the plugin from my wheezy to sid > > /usr/lib/mixxx/plugins/vamp/libmixxxminimal.so > > and installing the package > > libvamp-sdk2 > > then the mixxx can detect BPM and beat. Hmm... I guess this has been a fault of mine :-( I didn't check for any new file installed with this new version and missed that library, since former versions didn't have any library at all. Alessio already pushed a commit fixing this. Thanks for reporting and your efforts in solving this issue. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#683042: Blender: debian/copyright: No information of embedded external libraries
Hi Ross! Il 06/ott/2013 00:33 "Ross Gammon" ha scritto: > Wow - is there a license that isn't used in the Blender package! > > I have attached a patch with an updated copyright file where I have > included all copyrights/licenses found in the package. Thanks a lot for your massive work! ;-) Gonna give it a look tomorrow and then merge it in git repository, eventually. Thanks a lot for your efforts with this issue. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
Bug#683042: Blender: debian/copyright: No information of embedded external libraries
Hi again, Ross! On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 12:28:11AM +0200, Ross Gammon wrote: > I have attached a patch with an updated copyright file where I have > included all copyrights/licenses found in the package. I've checked and committed your patch to my local git repository. It will be part of next revision or release of Blender. Authorship was kept so you'll find the credit in changelog. Thanks again for your efforts is fixing this issue. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#725533: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#725533: opencolorio: FTBFS: ptr.h:10:32: fatal error: boost/shared_ptr.hpp: No such file or directory
Hi! On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:04:28PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. Besides the libboost-dev b-dep (its missing was already discovered in my local build environment) that must be added to the source package, the real big issue now is the un-coordinated transition of yaml-cpp from 0.3 to 0.5.1; this brought to a complete FTBFS on all the architectures. I'll add the above mentioned b-dep in next revision (or release), but surely we need to wait for "yaml-cpp transition" issue to be fixed to see a fully-working-again opencolorio package. Thanks for the report, anyhow. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721718:
Hi Igor! Il giorno 04/set/2013 09:39, "Игорь Пашев" ha scritto: > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/gegl/commit/?id=97067622352e58f86a24851dacb1f5daa0762897 Right. I'm on vacation now... bit gonna check it at the beginning of next week. Thanks for pointing this out ;-) Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
Bug#718580: ITP: mayan -- Django-based Electronic Document Management System (EDMS)
Hi Wouter! Il giorno 02/ago/2013 19:37, "Wouter Verhelst" ha scritto: > > Open-source, > > That's going to be redundant in any package for main or contrib, and > probably a lie if it's in non-free. No need to put claims about that in > the description ;-) Ahah... you're right :-) I removed that "Open-source" from both Subject field and Short Description, but forgot the Long Description ;-) Thanks for pointing me to this oversight. Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 0x83B2CF7A
