Hi Andreas! On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, that's for packages which are just in testing and if these needs > an update with minimal changes it is bad to have some higher version "in > between" in unstable. This is not the case for new packages so the > advise does not apply here.
OK, that's convincing enough for me ;-) Changing it right now. > > Already explained my point about that; however, feel free to "force" me > > to change it ;-) > Hoping to be able to convince rather than force. ;-) ;-) > > Could you possibly point me to a specific Debian Policy Manual paragraph > > for this change? Just to know why I'm doing this and if it's correct. > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities > > I do not see any conflicts to other packages. Moreover Debian Med policy > document gives another reason: > > http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html: > > Packages of priority “extra” are excluded from some QA tests. > > This is nothing what we want! We want QA tests! OK. Doing that too. > > > add myself to Uploaders > > > > If this would ease the upload, ok. > > This is irrelevant for the actual upload because the changelog entry is > relevant for "who has uploaded this package" and I would leave this > untouched to honor your work on this. I just tend to put myself into > Uploaders to express the fact that I have some interest in the package > (which was finally triggered by the request on the Debian Med list). OK, I must admit this was the first commit I made after your interest in the package ;-) Thanks for helping me having entangle in Debian! Cheers. -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
