Richard, Although I am not competent to decide on this either, I don't think Daniel's simulator goes as far as peripherals timing (in ns).
And, IMHO, there is not too much "buying drive" to make such a sophisticated simulator either. Some of the '51 simulations are done in the clock domain, most are done in the instruction cycle domain. Although I see the potential value of such a simulator; at the end of the day, when it comes to the nanosecond details, you need the real stuff anyway, don't you? Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
