On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jan Waclawek wrote: > OK the wording was a bit strong, I apologize.
That's OK, no problem. Sometimes GUI is more important but sometimes CLI can be usefull too. > Otherwise, it's a very fine simulator and I know it's a lot of work > you put into that, just the ease of use is more important for me > than the other features which are important for you or for the SDCC As you know it was developed as a special tool for my work so it was very good for me. It's not a general "best_for_everybody" tool so it is very possible that it doesn't fit for most users. I'm sorry for that but I can't help. Anybody can develop a better tool for her/himself (as I did), or pick a better one (there are a lot). Anyway, I think simulator should simulate only, and GUI should provide easy_to_use functionality. They can and should be different tools, working together of course. It was fun to develop ucsim, and I planed to write a GUI for it, but now I have an other "two month old son project" to deal with which is more funny... > Szep napot! Neked is:) Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
