Daniel, >Anyway, I think simulator should simulate only, and GUI should provide >easy_to_use functionality. They can and should be different tools, >working together of course. >
I disagree. IMHO, they _can_ be different tools, but they _don't_need_ to be different tools. I, as a _user_, don't care HOW is a tool done, built, written; I want to _use_ it. I don't mind it is separate, provided the UI is there, ready to use without any special hassle. It does not need to be graphical - your "beta DOS" version was not either, as were none of the half dozen or so '51 DOS-based simulators circulating around - they were all text-mode. Contrary - I don't like the windowey style of most of the "modern" simulators, they burn up too much of the precious pixels for the useless window borders and stuff. >It was fun to develop ucsim, and I planed to write a GUI for it, but >now I have an other "two month old son project" to deal with which is >more funny... > Oooooh, gratulalok! Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
