Commenting on a good point even though this is abandoned: > > the top 12 all time list of contributors to Sage, in order, are: > > > > [a list of 12 dudes] > > > > In the event of a gender-polarizing conflict, this committee will not > be seen as unbiased. In order to increase minority representation, I >
True, but currently unavoidable by that presumably-flawed metric. The only way to *really* fix this is for everyone to encourage their female colleagues/students/friends/enemies/frenemies to start using, and eventually contributing to Sage. This is a lot easier from my more pedagogically-focused context, but of course such people also are markedly less likely to become developers. This is part of a larger societal picture in math and CS that Sage cannot (by itself, that is) fix. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
