On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) <drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote: > but count me out.
As far as I can see, this idea is already abandoned anyway. Still, we could do this list of by self nomination and see if this leads to anything. We could call this the "community management team" and initially it consists of at least 5 self-nominated individuals, who didn't face some strong objections. Of course, it is a problem to communicate objections against someone in such a role directly. Maybe there should be some kind of voting, where each of those 5 need at least 5 who aren't nominated but "vouch" for them to get support in the community. Ok, I've finished my thought while writing, so I repeat: 1. new thread 2. call this "community management team" 3. self-nomination, at least 5 initially, who are somehow part of the Sage community 4. each of them need at least 5 supporters, who aren't part of this team, in order to receive support from the community. What they do is then up to their responsibility, and they should start with small steps (directing threads to sage-flame, receive complaints "in private", etc...) A "phase 2" could be to establish something similar for a "steering committee" for the whole Sage project. No idea if there is any need for this, but just an idea. -- Harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
