All tests passed on a fresh build on ubuntu 32-bit (took no longer than usual: 3099s).
Same on 64-bit (<3000s). John 2009/6/18 Marshall Hampton <hampto...@gmail.com>: > > All tests passed on an intel mac pro running 10.4.11. > > The tests took 6975 seconds, which seems like a big increase from > 3.0.2 (4818 seconds) and 3.4 (5358 seconds). Is this simply because > of the additional doctests, or are there serious speed regressions > somewhere? I recall some discussion about benchmarking each release > but I don't know if that has actually been done. > > -Marshall > > On Jun 18, 4:19 pm, Jaap Spies <j.sp...@hccnet.nl> wrote: >> Jaap Spies wrote: >> > Craig Citro wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> Here's rc3, which *should* be the last rc for this release cycle. I've >> >> tested it on my laptop and the build farm, and I've had no troubles at >> >> all, and it's currently going on a few other machines, so hopefully >> >> that'll turn out fine, too. Please test it and let me know if you run >> >> into anything at all. >> >> >> Source and sage.math binary are here: >> >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc... >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc... >> >> >> I believe that the necessary upgrade bits are sitting here, but I >> >> haven't tried it: >> >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc3/ >> >> > Upgrading went well on Fedora 10, 32 bit. Running tests now. >> >> All tests passed. >> >> Jaap > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
