On 18-Jun-09, at 11:28 PM, gsw wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 Jun., 08:21, gsw <georgswe...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> r/rpy does not build reliably for me anymore using " export
>> MAKE='make
>> -j2' " on my MacIntel Core2Duo / Mac OS X 10.4.11. I reported this
>> already for Sage-4.0.2.rc0 (in a one-message thread :-) ) thinking
>> that it would be sporadic, but it seems to hit always now: I built
>> Sage-4.0.2.rc2 and Sage-4.0.2.rc3 and also these two times, the
>> already reported "doubly built rpy" happened, and a doctest failure
>> is
>> the consequence:
>>
>> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/r.py"
>> **********************************************************************
>> File "/Users/Shared/sage/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/
>> r.py", line 549:
>> sage: r.library('foobar')
>> Expected:
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> ...
>> ImportError: there is no package called 'foobar'
>> Got nothing
>> **********************************************************************
>> File "/Users/Shared/sage/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/interfaces/
>> r.py", line 835:
>> sage: r.completions('tes')
>> Expected:
>> ['testPlatformEquivalence', 'testVirtual']
>> Got:
>> ['testPlatformEquivalence', 'testPlatformEquivalence',
>> 'testVirtual', 'testVirtual']
>> **********************************************************************
>> 2 items had failures:
>> 1 of 5 in __main__.example_17
>> 1 of 3 in __main__.example_34
>> ***Test Failed*** 2 failures.
>> For whitespace errors, see the file /Users/Shared/sage/
>> sage-4.0.2.rc0/
>> tmp/.doctest_r.py
>> [7.4 s]
>>
>> I checked back for the my Sage-4.0.1 Intel Mac OS X 10.4 build and
>> unfortunately yes, this problem is there, too --- so the currently
>> bdist'ed version is flawed :-/
>> I don't seem to have my Sage-4.0 logs anymore, but I found those for
>> Sage-3.4.2, and there the problem was *not* present.
>
> I just doctested /interfaces/r.py for the respective Sage-4.0 bdist of
> mine and the failure is not present there, so it seems to have been
> newly introduced into Sage 4.0.1.
> In other words, the Sage-4.0 bdist is OK. Phew.
Yes, the parallel build code was reworked for 4.0.1. Not sure why
we're seeing this, but still.
Nick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
