On 05.10.18 14:08, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> We might disagree here. If there is one place in which this extension > might be useful, I am not sure whether standardization is appropriate > because there is only one (potential) implementation. Again, not required (albeit desirable). RFC 2026 states this: > Usually, neither implementation nor operational experience is > required for the designation of a specification as a Proposed > Standard. However, such experience is highly desirable, and will > usually represent a strong argument in favor of a Proposed Standard > designation. Eliot _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
