On 04.10.18 14:26, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:42 AM
To: Gould, James <jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: hr...@irtf.org; h...@irtf.org; regext@ietf.org; gurshabad@cis-
india.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext-
verificationcode
Hi James,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 01:14:10PM +0000, Gould, James wrote:
Thanks for the review, Gurshabad. I'll consider your feedback in the
context of technical issues with the draft. The registration of domain
names in some jurisdictions may be subject to various requirements that
involve verification by a party other than the registry.
Could you please be so kind to link to some of these legal requirements?
There are several examples of registry operators that require verification as
part of their domain registration process. Here are a few ccTLD examples:
https://www.denic.de/en/faqs/faqs-for-domain-applicants/#faq-19
Hi Scott,
sorry to say that, but for DENIC, this is not correct. Of course, the registrar
is obliged to provide a valid registrant address, but there is no mandatory,
automated pre- nor post-validation of it in the DENIC registration process. Only
in case of a complaint of a third party (for an obvious "Mickey Mouse" or
incomplete address), DENIC requests the registrar to provide a correct address.
The link you provided refers to the case that the domain is involved in a
lawsuit. It is a requirement that has been changed in the context of the EU GDPR
and has actually been relaxed compared to the previous requirements.
Regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
