On 10/05/2018 01:55 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> I take no position on the HR issues of this draft. However:
>
>
>> If there is only one instance in which this MAY be useful, perhaps there
>> is no need for standardization of this extension?
>>
>
> Not the way we do business. We ask this question on the front end of
> the process, not the back end.
Where is this question baked in the process? And where is it said it
cannot be asked at a later stage? I did not find this in RFC 2418. All
pointers are welcome of course.
> That is a simple matter of fairness.
> Also, the form of rhetoric here is a bit disturbing.
Please elaborate? The 'MAY' was brought up by Scott in his previous email.
> When someone comes
> up with one example, it should not be assumed that there is in fact but
> one use (conversely one need not assume that there is more than one use,
> but as per above it is irrelevant).
>
Also see the previous emails, there has been research into different
registrars and registries and their practices, that is what we are
discussing about. No assumptions are being made.
Niels
> Eliot
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Researcher and PhD Candidate
Datactive Research Group
University of Amsterdam
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
