> -----Original Message----- > From: Klaus Malorny <klaus.malo...@knipp.de> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 3:39 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>; > 'li...@digitaldissidents.org' <li...@digitaldissidents.org>; Gould, James > <jgo...@verisign.com> > Cc: 'hr...@irtf.org' <hr...@irtf.org>; 'h...@irtf.org' <h...@irtf.org>; > 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>; 'gursha...@cis-india.org' > <gursha...@cis-india.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext- > verificationcode > > On 04.10.18 14:26, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:42 AM > >> To: Gould, James <jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> > >> Cc: hr...@irtf.org; h...@irtf.org; regext@ietf.org; gurshabad@cis- > >> india.org > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights Review of > >> draft-ietf-regext- verificationcode > >> > >> Hi James, > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 01:14:10PM +0000, Gould, James wrote: > >>> Thanks for the review, Gurshabad. I'll consider your feedback in the > >> context of technical issues with the draft. The registration of > >> domain names in some jurisdictions may be subject to various > >> requirements that involve verification by a party other than the > registry. > >> > >> Could you please be so kind to link to some of these legal > requirements? > > > > There are several examples of registry operators that require > verification as part of their domain registration process. Here are a few > ccTLD examples: > > > > https://www.denic.de/en/faqs/faqs-for-domain-applicants/#faq-19 > > > > Hi Scott, > > sorry to say that, but for DENIC, this is not correct. Of course, the > registrar is obliged to provide a valid registrant address, but there is > no mandatory, automated pre- nor post-validation of it in the DENIC > registration process. Only in case of a complaint of a third party (for an > obvious "Mickey Mouse" or incomplete address), DENIC requests the > registrar to provide a correct address. > > The link you provided refers to the case that the domain is involved in a > lawsuit. It is a requirement that has been changed in the context of the > EU GDPR and has actually been relaxed compared to the previous > requirements.
Thanks for the correction. The point I was trying to make is that there are multiple registry operators who require some form of verification and/or validation as part of their domain registration process. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
