Alan Cox wrote:
> M$ are pretty reasonable on DHCP compliance.
Well, two that I know of:
NT used to require null termination of some fields which the RFCs didn't.
NT used to not send all info in all phases of the protocol, except the first.
Haven't tried NT recently though.
> The stuff I'm helping track is mostly idiot cable modem vendors who basically seem
>to do
>
> 'did it work for 10 minutes with win95'
> 'Ok'
> 'Ship it'
We've recently seen weirdness there too with "Rogers Wave" cable. I don't personally
know the exact details (contact Ralph Siemsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), but I _think_ it
was something like puting the hostname in an optional vendor field.
--
Andrew E. Mileski - Software Engineer
REBEL.COM http://www.rebel.com/
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
