On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 11:47:45 AM UTC-6, Bob Lovejoy wrote: > > > The actual page for the Appaloosa frame shows a chart with different > numbers (59.7 tt) but I believe that is actual/physical top tube length and > not the effective/level length, taking into account the sloping top tube.. > That seems to me the discrepancy, at least with the Appaloosa numbers. >
I too thought that might be the explanation, but it wouldn't explain the disparity with the front-center numbers. Thanks for measuring and reporting, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
