I do agree... It helps me as well, at least I believe it does! Also, the Sam H. numbers looks off to me. It shows the 58cm Sam with a 61.5cm (effective?) top tube, the same as the Appaloosa. That would definitely be a change if correct.
Also, in reference to iamkeith's post... It seems I remember two different sets of geometry numbers around for the Appaloosa. I just concentrated on the one I thought correct but I did cringe at the potential for confusion. Bob Galesburg, IL On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:12:54 AM UTC-5, Garth wrote: > > It seems reach/stack is absent ..... that to me is very useful for > comparisons sake with other models. > I'd very much appreciate it returning 😀 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
