I noticed the Sam TT numbers as well. That seems a lot longer. Being relatively new to Rivendell bikes I just see the increase of Top Tube and Chain Stays in each new model.
I am curious, for folks who have ridden both, how does the Sam Hillborne compare to the old Atlantis (not taking account the tire clearance). Some of the measurements are very similar, and from my understanding, the tubes are pretty stout on the SH. I am currently most enjoying the Rambouilett I have and would love a stouter version of it. I am 210, so with carrying a kid and groceries, I know I am well passed the Grant recommended weights. On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 7:05:37 AM UTC-7, Bob Lovejoy wrote: > > I do agree... It helps me as well, at least I believe it does! > > Also, the Sam H. numbers looks off to me. It shows the 58cm Sam with a > 61.5cm (effective?) top tube, the same as the Appaloosa. That would > definitely be a change if correct. > > Also, in reference to iamkeith's post... It seems I remember two different > sets of geometry numbers around for the Appaloosa. I just concentrated on > the one I thought correct but I did cringe at the potential for confusion. > > Bob > Galesburg, IL > > > On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 5:12:54 AM UTC-5, Garth wrote: >> >> It seems reach/stack is absent ..... that to me is very useful for >> comparisons sake with other models. >> I'd very much appreciate it returning 😀 > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
