I like: ride, design, aesthetics, utility, and quality of the bicycles; attention to craft; s240; focus on riding for the joy of it; Book of Nonsense; nudging racing's dominance, friendliness; Quickbeam; utilitarian.
In theory, I miss the Ram/Rom. But I have a Romulus. I ride it rack- less and on harder rides. Its perfect for that. I'd like bag continuity too. No complaints. Like many of you, I've spent some time at RBW HQ talking with folks and checking things out. Its hard to think of a more thoughtful place. Esteban On Apr 13, 6:40 am, Bill Connell <bconn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Love: Grant's cycling philosophy and writing style, his willingness to > put new ideas into the stream, and the general wackiness like the > ongoing 'e'-less Raven contest. The value of beausage (whether you > like his word for it or not). I also support the idea of the new > Taiwanese-built frames, in the hope that it means i can eventually > afford a Quickbeam-like frame. > > Meh: Lack of continuity in things like the bike bags. I'm sure this is > as much as supplier issue as anything, but it would be good to have a > core lineup of things like the Atlantis. I liked the Speedblends too, > i thought they were pretty cool, but probably too expensive for the > younger crowd that might take to them better. > > -- > Bill Connell > St. Paul, MN --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
